Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs MetaDefender comparison

Bitdefender and OPSWAT are both solutions in the Anti-Malware Tools category. Bitdefender is ranked #54, while OPSWAT is ranked #37. Bitdefender holds a 0.8% mindshare in Anti-Malware Tools, compared to OPSWAT’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OPSWAT users who would recommend it.

Bitdefender Hypervisor Intr...

Read 3 Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection reviews

884 Views
433 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

MetaDefender

Read 2 MetaDefender reviews

1,528 Views
1,222 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bitdefender Hypervisor Intr...

MetaDefender

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection and MetaDefender compete in virtualization security. Bitdefender appears superior with advanced threat detection.

Features: Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection offers real-time monitoring, introspection-based threat detection, and hypervisor-level protection. MetaDefender provides multi-scanning technology, secure data sanitization, and efficient data handling.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection integrates seamlessly into existing infrastructure with comprehensive support. MetaDefender's deployment involves multi-layer setups, potentially increasing complexity, and it may require more extensive processes.

Pricing and ROI: Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection involves higher upfront costs but promises a greater ROI through enhanced security and reduced downtime. MetaDefender is viewed as budget-friendly with modest initial investments, appealing for limited budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed Anti-Malware Tools Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Anti-Malware Tools

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender Hypervisor Intr...

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

54th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (59th)

MetaDefender

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

37th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (37th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (38th), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MetaDefender is 1.4%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Anti-Malware Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MetaDefender	1.4%
Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection	0.8%
Other	97.8%

Anti-Malware Tools

Featured Reviews

Muhammad-Imran

Network administrator at Al Hussan Group

Stable but bad technical support, and an out of date database

We primarily use the solution to protect our business The solution protects us so that we have regular security from attacks. It prevents disasters from happening on our system. The endpoint protection is the solution's most valuable feature. The database needs improvement. It needs to be…

Read full review

Eido Ben Noun

Cyber Security Architect at Diffiesec

Multi‑engine detection has significantly improved secure file transfers and threat prevention

Some feedback indicated that it takes too much time to configure certain policies because there are many options. Some people appreciate this because you can configure anything, but I believe MetaDefender should have a wizard or general policies that can be used for 80 percent of customers. I use the expanded file type and archive coverage feature sometimes, especially for customers who try to scan large archives with the deep scan capabilities of OPSWAT and Deep CDR. This provides full protection because it scans every single file, but sometimes it takes too long. When discussing CAB files or archives for patching or server updates and BIOS updates and operating system updates, the scanning process takes too long, and it was difficult for customers who sometimes decided not to scan because the scanning time was excessive. I use the reporting and audit visibility features. Some capabilities are lacking in reporting because we do not have full statistics that are easy for users to understand. If something requires checking and then referring to documentation to understand it, that is too much for most users. When looking at one of the statistics, you can see how many files have been scanned and then you see a number out of 500 or a different number if you change it. It is not a number of files or scan processes; it is a number of files inside a file. When you scan a PowerPoint presentation file, for example, it counts as forty different files because of all the sub-files. I understand from customers that when they look at the visualization data or statistics, they do not understand what is happening there. Most customers I see do not use the file-based vulnerability assessment feature. It has some good results about vulnerabilities, but I am not certain if it is that helpful because many organizations, when they deploy a file and see that there are vulnerabilities, still deploy it because it is part of the code. It can produce results, but those results do not cause any action. Many products have something more advanced than vulnerabilities and static scoring. They have tools that can inform you about a vulnerability, whether the vulnerability is exploitable, if it is weaponized, and if someone can use this vulnerability in your environment. The file-based vulnerability feature works, but for most people, they do not take any action based on the results or block files because of file-based vulnerabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The endpoint protection is the solution's most valuable feature."

"The solution has exchange protection. It has a content control, device control, a firewall, and anti-malware as well. They are all quite valuable features for us."

"I like the simplicity of this solution and the fact that it saves us time. The deployment was really straightforward and useful and I am impressed by the anti-virus endpoint detection and response offered by this solution."

"I like the simplicity, the way it works out of the box. It's pretty easy to run and configure. The integration of the network devices with the ICAP server was easily done."

"OPSWAT is the best alternative."

Cons

"There needs to be better integration with the environment. Especially, for the active directory and also for keeping up with the changes from Microsoft. We use a lot of Microsoft OS. I have noted that sometimes they lag behind Microsoft updates. For example, when with Windows 10. I had some issues with deploying to Windows 10 because the solution was behind in updating their own services to match the Microsoft release."

"The database needs improvement. It needs to be updated quite a bit."

"There are blurred lines between anti-virus and endpoint detection so I would say it can be confusing when you are considering buying this program. I would like to see that being explained better to the customer."

"Some capabilities are lacking in reporting because we do not have full statistics that are easy for users to understand."

"The documentation is not well written, and I often need to talk with support."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There's a yearly cost for licensing. For us, that comes to $1,400. There are no additional costs beyond the license itself."

"We bought a three-year license, and that was pretty expensive. We agreed that it was really worth buying. It could be cheaper, but we understand that quality comes at a price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Healthcare Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection

Compared 23% of the time

Advanced SystemCare Ultimate vs Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection

Compared 18% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office vs Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection

Compared 13% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection

Compared 9% of the time

More Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection Competitors

VirusTotal vs MetaDefender

Compared 31% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs MetaDefender

Compared 14% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs MetaDefender

Compared 10% of the time

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs MetaDefender

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiGuard vs MetaDefender

Compared 8% of the time

More MetaDefender Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Anti-Malware Tools

January 2026

Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection report

Download Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection product report

Buyer's Guide

Anti-Malware Tools

January 2026

Download MetaDefender product report

Also Known As

HVI

OPSWAT MetaDefender, MetaDefender Core

Overview

Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection (HVI) is the first security solution that is able to uncover memory violations that endpoint security tools sometimes miss by directly analyzing raw memory lines - thereby ensuring they are not being altered by malware.

Bitdefender

MetaDefender provides advanced multiscanning capabilities using 30+ anti-malware engines, ensuring high detection efficacy and robust prevention mechanisms.

MetaDefender's approach combines multiple security technologies like Metascan, Deep CDR, and adaptive sandboxing. These integrated solutions offer comprehensive protection against malware and vulnerabilities, catering to cloud, on-prem, and hybrid environments with enhanced performance and automation.

What are the key features of MetaDefender?

Metascan Multiscanning: Utilizes 30+ AV engines for superior malware detection.
Deep CDR: Eliminates active threats by reconstructing safe files.
File-based Vulnerability Assessment: Identifies software vulnerabilities before deployment.
Adaptive Sandbox Analysis: AI-powered sandbox to expose evasive threats.
Proactive DLP: Detects and handles sensitive data to prevent data loss.
Expanded File-Type Coverage: Supports modern documents and archived files.
Enhanced Automation: Faster scans with consistent policy enforcement.
Improved Reporting: Comprehensive end-to-end file action tracking.

What benefits and ROI can MetaDefender offer?

High detection rates: Boasts over 99% detection of known and unknown threats.
Reduced Workflow: Dramatic cut in file-borne malware incidents and manual work.
Flexible Deployment: Consistent performance in cloud, on-prem, hybrid, and air-gapped environments.

MetaDefender is trusted in industries such as financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, and government, where rigorous policy control and auditability are vital. Its diverse deployment options allow for consistent security across datacenters, OT networks, and secure facilities, meeting stringent compliance needs.

OPSWAT

Sample Customers

Kansas Development Finance Authority (KDFA), Quilvest

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Anti-Malware Tools. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.

We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.