Azure Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) comparison

Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Download the complete report

Helped 911,493 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

3.9

Azure Web Application Firewall offers cost-efficiency through reduced administration, AI enhancements, and competitive pricing compared to leading competitors.

Sentiment score

6.3

Check Point WAF increases ROI by reducing costs, improving efficiency, enhancing security, and offering a pay-as-you-use model.

Recently, they have been under serious attack with major exploits, such as Log4j, affecting Fortinet and Palo Alto, and even Cisco and VMware.

Senior Solutions Architect at EQ2 Technology

AI-based recommendations save on time and money.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Web Application Firewall report

Head of Digital Engineering, Management Consultant at Stax Inc.

When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.

Thanos Constantopoulos

Manager, Managed Security Services at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.1

Microsoft support is generally satisfactory, with users preferring higher-tier options for faster response and clearer communication.

Sentiment score

6.6

Check Point WAF's customer support is praised for responsiveness, though some suggest improvements for complex issue handling and 24/7 availability.

They are good at troubleshooting and configuring things.

Head of Digital Engineering, Management Consultant at Stax Inc.

I am very satisfied with the response from Microsoft dedicated architects if it happens that I have to call for their support.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Web Application Firewall report

Senior Solutions Architect at EQ2 Technology

I reached out to their support, and they helped me resolve the issue effectively.

Adolfo Albanell

Owner at ICAL S.A.

They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.6

Azure Web Application Firewall offers flexible, highly-rated scalability, easily adapting to traffic changes and various workload needs across subscriptions.

Sentiment score

7.3

Check Point WAF excels in scalability, adapting to diverse cloud environments with a flexible licensing model and SaaS deployment.

Some Azure applications, like the web application firewall, require a certain level of SKU for hosting setup.

Head of Digital Engineering, Management Consultant at Stax Inc.

For our company, Azure Web Application Firewall works effectively for scalability.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Web Application Firewall report

Global IT Solutions Specialist at RELIEF INTERNATIONAL INC

If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.

Ruben Ruiz

Sr. VP of Creative & Development at a non-tech company with 51-200 employees

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.1

Azure Web Application Firewall is highly stable, with minimal connectivity or performance issues and consistently earns high reliability ratings.

Sentiment score

8.2

Check Point WAF is highly stable and reliable, with users praising its consistent performance and minimal issues.

Very rarely do I see any latency issues.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Web Application Firewall report

Head of Digital Engineering, Management Consultant at Stax Inc.

It is very stable.

RicardoFernandes1

Team Leader, Cloudops & Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees

It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.

Rui Dias

Sysadmin at a government with 501-1,000 employees

I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Room For Improvement

Azure Web Application Firewall needs better reporting, integration, cost plans, and process streamlining for enhanced management and support.

Check Point WAF needs UI simplification, better integration, improved documentation, and enhanced AI features for improved user experience.

Upgrading the platform regularly is necessary for security, however, frequent updates every six months or year from Azure can be a maintenance overhead.

Head of Digital Engineering, Management Consultant at Stax Inc.

The pricing needs improvement, and I think for beginners it will be a little bit complicated, so the ease of use could be enhanced.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Web Application Firewall report

Global IT Solutions Specialist at RELIEF INTERNATIONAL INC

The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.

Kresimir Mikolcevic

Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.

reviewer2702679

Technical Support Executive at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Setup Cost

Azure Web Application Firewall offers scalable pricing, valued functionality, and favorable terms, appealing compared to AWS and GCP.

Enterprise buyers find Check Point WAF pricey but valuable for its features, though pricing complexity varies by company size.

It is even a lower cost compared to AWS and GCP.

Senior Solutions Architect at EQ2 Technology

Sometimes, when opting for a higher SKU, it's not the WAF itself that's costly but the additional requirements.

Head of Digital Engineering, Management Consultant at Stax Inc.

I would place Azure Web Application Firewall at an eight on a scale from one to 10, with one being cheap and 10 being expensive.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Web Application Firewall report

Global IT Solutions Specialist at RELIEF INTERNATIONAL INC

It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.

Baruch Peretz

Ciso at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Valuable Features

Azure Web Application Firewall offers robust security, seamless Azure integration, automatic rule management, and scalable, user-friendly deployment with minimal downtime.

Check Point WAF excels in AI threat detection, seamless cloud integration, user-friendly interface, and minimizing false positives.

With Microsoft, everything is within a single suite, making it easier to configure and plan.

Head of Digital Engineering, Management Consultant at Stax Inc.

It is almost impossible to access these assets from outside, requiring a very skilled attacker to obtain asset tokens of a customer using Azure.

Senior Solutions Architect at EQ2 Technology

It integrates effectively with things such as Sentinel and Defender for Cloud, so mostly it's the analytics and now the AI capabilities that have been introduced with Co-pilot.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Web Application Firewall report

Global IT Solutions Specialist at RELIEF INTERNATIONAL INC

Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.

Domenico Cacciari

Security Administrator at Regione Marche

The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Categories and Ranking

Azure Web Application Firewall

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (19th)

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (5th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), DevSecOps (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Azure Web Application Firewall is 1.8%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	2.0%
Azure Web Application Firewall	1.8%
Other	96.2%

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Offers robust analytics and seamless cloud integration with minor room for user interface improvement

Global IT Solutions Specialist at RELIEF INTERNATIONAL INC

The Microsoft support and the analytics are what I appreciate about Azure Web Application Firewall. It integrates effectively with things such as Sentinel and Defender for Cloud, so mostly it's the analytics and now the AI capabilities that have been introduced with Co-pilot. It helps when looking for threats. It reduces issues significantly because the filtering capabilities are high. Given that it's a cloud solution, we have very minimal downtime, especially because we have Microsoft support. On a scale of one to 10, I would give it an eight.

Read full review

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

911,493 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

17%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	56
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	36

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Web Application Firewall?

I would place Azure Web Application Firewall at an eight on a scale from one to 10, with one being cheap and 10 being expensive.

What needs improvement with Azure Web Application Firewall?

The pricing needs improvement, and I think for beginners it will be a little bit complicated, so the ease of use could be enhanced. I've worked with Fortinet and Cisco, and I think the UI is a litt...

What is your primary use case for Azure Web Application Firewall?

Because we mostly operate in the cloud and because we're a Microsoft environment, it was the best option in the scenario. The options were limited in terms of wanting to be an only Microsoft enviro...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

AWS WAF vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Front Door vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 8% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 7% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs Azure Web Application Firewall

Compared 5% of the time

More Azure Web Application Firewall Competitors

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Product Reports

Azure Web Application Firewall

Download Azure Web Application Firewall product report

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Also Known As

No data available

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

Overview

Azure Web Application Firewall provides strong protection, easy setup, and smooth integration with Microsoft services. It excels in request filtering, custom rule creation, and protection against OWASP Top 10 attacks, ensuring scalable and reliable performance for businesses.

Azure Web Application Firewall offers flexible, affordable, and efficient protection against critical security threats like DDoS and SQL injection, with seamless integration with Azure tools, analytics, and AI capabilities. Users appreciate its ability to handle web requests through role-based access, automation features, and custom policies, especially valuable in cloud environments and ecommerce. Despite the need to improve reporting, management, proxy forwarding, and documentation, it remains a reliable choice for securing front-facing applications.

What are the most important features of Azure Web Application Firewall?

Request Filtering: Blocks undesirable web traffic.
Custom Rule Creation: Enables granular control.
OWASP Protection: Shields against top 10 security vulnerabilities.
Seamless Azure Integration: Enhances security management.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in Azure Web Application Firewall reviews?

Scalability: Supports business growth.
Affordability: Cost-effective for businesses.
Reduced Deployment Time: Quick and efficient setup.
Enhanced Security: Protects against various threats.

Azure Web Application Firewall is widely used in ecommerce for securing transactions against cyber threats like phishing and SQL injection. It also supports reverse proxy setups, provides detailed log analytics, and offers layer 7 protection, making it suitable for businesses needing robust security for both front-facing and branch connectivity applications.

Microsoft

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)