Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery comparison

Microsoft and Broadcom are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category. Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.6, while Broadcom is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. Microsoft holds a 9.9% mindshare in DRS, compared to Broadcom’s 10.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Azure Site Recovery

Read 26 Azure Site Recovery reviews

3,171 Views
1,173 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Read 82 VMware Live Recovery reviews

7,999 Views
1,360 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Azure Site Recovery

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 11, 2026

Azure Site Recovery and VMware Live Recovery are prominent solutions in the disaster recovery market. Azure often has the advantage due to its cost-efficiency and flexibility, which appeals to budget-conscious users.

Features:Azure Site Recovery is recognized for user-friendly setup, seamless failover, and integration with Microsoft ecosystems. It is scalable and easy to use. VMware Live Recovery offers robust automation, disaster recovery testing, and integration with storage solutions, supporting large-scale environments effectively.

Room for Improvement:Azure Site Recovery could benefit from better pricing predictability, enhanced scalability, and improved support services. VMware Live Recovery could enhance automation, speed up support resolution, and reduce costs. Users also desire better cloud integration and logging capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Azure Site Recovery is suited for Public and Hybrid Cloud environments, which is beneficial for Microsoft-embedded organizations. Its customer support has varying feedback regarding response times. VMware Live Recovery is often deployed On-premises, offering efficient deployment at a higher cost, with calls for more responsive support.

Pricing and ROI:Azure Site Recovery is seen as cost-effective, providing good ROI by leveraging cloud efficiencies. VMware Live Recovery is considered expensive, justified for larger enterprises due to its automation and integration capabilities, but may deter smaller organizations looking for budget-friendly options.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Live Recovery Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Live Recovery

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,611 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.2

Azure Site Recovery is cost-effective, time-saving, and reliable, optimizing virtual machine processes and offering an alternative to secondary data centers.

Sentiment score

5.5

VMware Live Recovery offers strong ROI, reducing DR costs up to 50% and improving financial performance with effective resource planning.

Azure Site Recovery, while being pricier than some providers, has a sufficient service level to justify costs.

Jenny Ng

Client Relationship Manager at Infomag

Azure Site Recovery is time-saving, and its features allow us to automate processes and save resources.

RituparnaBhattacharya

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Site Recovery report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.4

Microsoft's Azure Site Recovery support is knowledgeable but inconsistent, with mixed reviews on response times and communication efficiency.

Sentiment score

4.1

VMware Live Recovery customer service is generally effective, but occasional delays and improvement suggestions exist, especially with third-party issues.

During a global outage that affected our operations, there was no apology or in-depth follow-up from Microsoft.

reviewer2698704

Chief Technology Officer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

Microsoft support could be improved as it rates only a five out of ten, with slow response times and a preference for email over phone communication even in severity B cases.

Ashadeep Parida

IT Manager at NTT DATA

We primarily rely on our Cloud Support Partner for support.

RituparnaBhattacharya

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Site Recovery report

They are knowledgeable.

Yosevan Sinaga Sinaga

IT Infrastructure Manager at TMLI

Our team has dedicated personnel for support who engage with the supporting teams.

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

The technical support from VMware is very good and operates based on a service level.

ErmiasGirma

Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at Safaricom Ethiopia plc

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.7

Azure Site Recovery is scalable, excelling in cloud migration and disaster recovery for businesses, despite regional scalability variations.

Sentiment score

5.4

VMware Live Recovery is scalable, supports various environments, though licensing and upgrades may challenge some users.

I would rate the scalability of Azure Site Recovery as a nine out of ten.

reviewer2698704

Chief Technology Officer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

Scalability is provided because they are offering 99.95% availability.

Ashadeep Parida

IT Manager at NTT DATA

Azure Site Recovery is a very scalable product and service mechanism.

Jenny Ng

Client Relationship Manager at Infomag

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Site Recovery report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.7

Azure Site Recovery is highly rated for stability and scalability, frequently scoring between seven and ten by users.

Sentiment score

8.5

VMware Live Recovery is generally stable and reliable, though some users face issues during upgrades or high-capacity use.

The system did go down a couple of times, which impacted our operations.

reviewer2698704

Chief Technology Officer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

I would rate the stability of Azure Site Recovery at eight to nine out of ten.

RituparnaBhattacharya

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Site Recovery report

For our test labs, dev labs, and production, it is very stable.

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Room For Improvement

Azure Site Recovery needs better integration, deployment, stability, security, and support, with improved logging, pricing, and platform compatibility.

VMware Live Recovery needs better storage integration, automation, support, interface, documentation, pricing, cloud compatibility, and enhanced AI capabilities.

If their agent version is mismatched and the health status is critical, you will not be able to perform your Azure Site Recovery.

Ashadeep Parida

IT Manager at NTT DATA

There is room for improvement in the release of patches, such as ensuring they are properly managed to avoid outages.

Jenny Ng

Client Relationship Manager at Infomag

Currently, Azure Site Recovery does not support shared disk options.

RituparnaBhattacharya

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Site Recovery report

It's important for the cost to be justified based on the features used in production.

Sven Nimmich

Solution Architect at Lenovo

I would like to see improved integration services with other solutions, such as SIEM management or security monitoring.

Yosevan Sinaga Sinaga

IT Infrastructure Manager at TMLI

They follow their SOP, but they initially engage very low-level personnel who are not able to answer or resolve the issue, so they escalate or take a very long time to resolve the issue.

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Setup Cost

Azure Site Recovery offers cost-effective DR solutions despite complex billing, with average monthly site-to-site replication costs at $225.

VMware Live Recovery costs depend on VM count and protection plan, with pricing complexity increasing after the Broadcom acquisition.

It was not the expensive part of our costs.

reviewer2698704

Chief Technology Officer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

A major advantage is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site.

Ashadeep Parida

IT Manager at NTT DATA

The pricing of Azure Site Recovery is around a four out of ten, being somewhat cost-effective.

Jenny Ng

Client Relationship Manager at Infomag

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Site Recovery report

Previously, when acquiring a license for Ethiopian drug supply chains, the price was significantly high, especially after Broadcom joined VMware.

ErmiasGirma

Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at Safaricom Ethiopia plc

For cloud-based solutions, the cost seems quite pricey, so we stick to on-premises deployment.

Yosevan Sinaga Sinaga

IT Infrastructure Manager at TMLI

We mostly prefer to recommend this to customers due to ease of use, abundant features, and support.

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Valuable Features

Azure Site Recovery is praised for seamless failover, ease of use, compatibility, but may be costly for smaller clients.

The solution provides automated disaster recovery, VMware integration, and seamless management for robust business continuity and operational efficiency.

Its time-saving aspects allow us to write PowerShell scripts to automate failover processes.

RituparnaBhattacharya

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at MIC Global

Azure provides a 99.99% SLA for their uptime, ensuring that even during outages due to patch releases, there is no data loss, merely hindered accessibility.

Jenny Ng

Client Relationship Manager at Infomag

The most valuable features of Azure Site Recovery are its ease of use and speed of recovery.

reviewer2698704

Chief Technology Officer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Site Recovery report

It is used for data replication between data centers and allows for quick response in times of failure, ensuring data availability.

ErmiasGirma

Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at Safaricom Ethiopia plc

If I talk about vCenter and the auto failover of the VMs, such as live migration, that is a very cool feature that we require in our environment because we have different data centers, and if some of the servers fail, they automatically failover and move the VM from one side to another.

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

The capability and the functionality of the features are very helpful for us.

Yosevan Sinaga Sinaga

IT Infrastructure Manager at TMLI

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Categories and Ranking

Azure Site Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Live Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery as a Service

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Disaster Recovery as a Service category, the mindshare of Azure Site Recovery is 9.9%, down from 23.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Live Recovery is 10.0%, down from 25.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery as a Service Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Live Recovery	10.0%
Azure Site Recovery	9.9%
Other	80.1%

Disaster Recovery as a Service

Featured Reviews

Ashadeep Parida

IT Manager at NTT DATA

Long-term user praises cost savings and reliability of disaster recovery solutions

There is only one thing to note: the agent has to be up-to-date when SCCM or any third-party tools are doing patching activities. If their agent version is mismatched and the health status is critical, you will not be able to perform your Azure Site Recovery. Recently, I worked with a mass issue related to Recovery Services Vault, and the VM support engineers are taking a lot of time to extend support to the customer. When you raise a call, they wait too long, and even if you request an engineer to set up a call for severity B cases, they are not ready to communicate over the phone, preferring email instead.

Read full review

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

Has enabled seamless VM management and automated failover while support response needs improvement

For support issues, they help with the issue, but it takes a very long time. The reason is that they engage a very initial resource and then escalate to another level, and during these level escalations, our time is wasted. They do not understand the severity of the issue. They go through step-by-step and then go to the upper level. This may be their SOP, but we require instant support and instant resolution of the problem, so here VMware Live Recovery is lacking. They follow their SOP, but they initially engage very low-level personnel who are not able to answer or resolve the issue, so they escalate or take a very long time to resolve the issue. The main issue is to improve the approach of resolving solutions. I may not be able to suggest new features because in these recent months, I have not been very close to it as we are exploring different solutions.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,611 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Site Recovery?

A major advantage is that you do not want to pay any more for huge costs to build a DR site. It is very flexible and will save your cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Site Recovery?

The flexibility of Azure Site Recovery regarding integration with different IT environments is limited; it is purely an Azure platform service for business continuity, not meant for integration wit...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Site Recovery?

My main use case for Azure Site Recovery is that we are doing cross-region disaster recovery and processing.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We have been using VMware Live Recovery since 2015, and most of our effort relies on it. I personally feel that it is very easy to use, easy to manage, and provides many features compared to other ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We are the partner as well as the integrator, and we mostly work in the integration industry. Integration is our core business, but we also do partnership activities. Most of our projects are based...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 11% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

SEP Software vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs Azure Site Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Site Recovery Competitors

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 33% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 13% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 2% of the time

Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 2% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery

May 2026

Download Azure Site Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery

April 2026

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

Also Known As

No data available

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Overview

Azure Site Recovery ensures seamless disaster recovery with features like scalability, automated file synchronization, real-time dashboards, and secure processes. It achieves a 99.99% uptime SLA and is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly interface.

Azure Site Recovery is a comprehensive disaster recovery service featuring load-balancing, fast snapshots, and native Azure integration for reliable performance. It manages virtual machine synchronization with seamless failover and data consistency, aiding in reducing secondary site expenses. With its robust architecture, the service supports organizations in maintaining business continuity, meeting regulatory compliance, and minimizing downtime through regular failover drills. Its implementation often capitalizes on Azure's reliability, ensuring infrastructure uptime and reduced hardware requirements.

What are the essential features of Azure Site Recovery?

Scalability: Adjusts to varying data loads for optimized performance.
User-Friendly Console: Simplifies configuration and management processes.
Automated File Synchronization: Ensures data consistency across locations.
Real-Time Dashboards: Offers immediate insights into system health and recovery status.
Secure Processes: Protects data with advanced security protocols.

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Azure Site Recovery?

Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces need for extensive hardware investments.
Reduced Downtime: Ensures quick recovery, maintaining business operations.
High SLA Guarantees: Provides reliability with 99.99% uptime.
Resource Efficiency: Saves time and effort in disaster recovery management.

Organizations in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail implement Azure Site Recovery for its robust disaster recovery capabilities. The service navigates regulatory challenges with ease, aiding businesses in data duplication, VMware replication, and infrastructure backup. Its efficiency is leveraged to maintain critical systems during outages, facilitating business continuity and operational stability.

Microsoft

VMware Live Recovery offers seamless disaster recovery with automation, ease of use, and integration with VMware environments. It supports a wide array of storage vendors, ensuring business continuity with effective replication and recovery of VMs.

VMware Live Recovery is recognized for its automation in disaster recovery, valuable integration with extensive VMware environments, and its ability to support a multitude of storage vendors. The platform provides features like re-protect, automated recovery, and non-disruptive testing with a user-friendly interface simplifying management tasks. Users benefit from policy-based protection and centralized management, boosting operational efficiency. The ability to replicate and recover virtual machines with minimal intervention facilitates business continuity across different sites. However, there's room for improvement in database integration, virtual appliance offerings for SRM, and a less complex licensing model. Enhancements in stability, technical support, clearer setup documentation, and broader integration with third-party tools are equally important.

What are VMware Live Recovery's standout features?

Re-Protect: Enables efficient site recovery with seamless workflow reversal.
Automated Recovery: Simplifies disaster recovery with minimal manual steps.
Non-Disruptive Testing: Allows validation of recovery plans without service interruption.
Policy-based Protection: Facilitates streamlined management with automated protection policies.
Centralized Management: Supports unified control across extensive environments.

Which benefits and ROI should users focus on when evaluating VMware Live Recovery?

Business Continuity: Ensures operations remain unaffected during disruptions.
Reduced Recovery Time: Minimizes downtime with efficient failover processes.
Integration Versatility: Compatible with a wide range of storage vendors.
Operational Efficiency: Automation and management tools simplify complex tasks.

Organizations leverage VMware Live Recovery primarily for disaster recovery, enabling data replication and continuity across multiple locations. Essential in facilitating failover automation, it helps maintain critical services and execute disaster recovery drills effectively. It supports data center migrations, site replication, and testing recovery processes. Through protecting virtual machines and applications, it guarantees service reliability even during outages or planned maintenance, serving industries focused on data security and operational uptime.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

Buyer's Guide

Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Live Recovery

April 2026

Free Report: Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Live Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Live Recovery and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,611 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Site Recovery vs. VMware Live Recovery report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.