We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Veeam Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution."
"Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."
"The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."
"It's streamlined the backup and recovery for my customers in the sense that it has an easy management console that's easy to set up any type of instant recovery."
"The initial setup was very easy."
"They provide good technical support and we are satisfied with the support we have received."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the new CDP features. It is very popular for my customer's needs."
"The solution is very easy to deploy."
"From my experience, Veeam is very good. Its interface is user-friendly. We can restore it whenever. It's not complicated. It's very easy to manage and administration is very easy."
"It has helped us transfer the solution in two days instead of working for a minimum of one week to ten days."
"The most valuable features are the backup and restoration of our VMs. Additionally, they add features regularly."
"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The tool should improve synchronization."
"I would like to see more security features."
"It could include more of a backup and recovery."
"Could have more integration with other platforms."
"When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
"They can improve the features and Veeam Enterprise Manager. The interface and features are kind of limited. It would be good if they can provide more features and a better interface. For example, if I want to provide certain users with the privilege to back up and restore and do day-to-day tasks, I cannot do it in the current version. It is like you either give everything to everyone or no user can have access to anything. In version 9, a lot of features were missing, and it wasn't clear. Version 10 is easier from the communication perspective, and the disk backup option is very clear."
"I have found that the reporting could improve in its structure."
"The cost needs to be considered."
"In Linux, I suggest you backup for a PostgreSQL database."
"They need full cloud integration such that an on-premises backup can be offloaded to the cloud for storage."
"I would want them to improve some technical features that are still missing because we are working with NetApp NVMe and they're not fully supporting it yet. But both NetApp and Veeam know about it and they're working on it."
"I would like to see better features for exporting to cloud-based repositories."
"It's hard to answer because managing cloud storage in our version could be better, but now that they have improved it in the recent version, I cannot say it's a better point because I know it should be already fixed."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while Veeam Backup & Replication is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 328 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Veeam Backup & Replication is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Backup & Replication writes "Beneficial pricing model, user friendly interface, and many free features". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery and Commvault Cloud, whereas Veeam Backup & Replication is most compared with Acronis Cyber Protect, Azure Backup, Rubrik, Veritas NetBackup and Zerto. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Veeam Backup & Replication report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
