We performed a comparison between Azure Backup and Iron Mountain Connect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Azure Backup is its ease of use and good integration with other Azure services."
"One of the most valuable features is security and connectivity to the data."
"The most valuable feature is the ease in which it backs up our data."
"There is only one feature, and that is the backup."
"With a couple of buttons, we can configure a VM for a backup and use the wall service, the storage wall service, pretty seamlessly."
"The daily backups have become easier since we no longer need to handle large backups. The use of Azure Backup as a service has proven reliable and simplified our daily operations. Previously, we relied on LTO backups for data retention, but after migrating to the cloud and adopting Azure Backup, the delivery process has become smoother."
"I like that it's a stable solution and their support is good. I think Microsoft's commercial force is superior."
"The backup features are very useful."
"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"While Azure Backup allows ingress data, the egress data is chargeable, which should be excluded."
"Azure Backup is limited to certain workloads. It would be helpful if Microsoft focused on enabling backups for Oracle and other unsupported databases."
"Lacks an AI system that would enable easier upgrading of the hardware."
"I can’t use the solution to restore another native cloud solution. Azure must add this new feature."
"The time required to restore files should be a little faster."
"To make it a ten, it should have the ability to extend the retention and to perform a copy of the data outside of the subscription - with no additional costs."
"The Azure Backup support for on-premises service is limited."
"I would like to see more automation, integration, and security. The price could be better."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
Azure Backup is ranked 9th in Backup and Recovery with 51 reviews while Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews. Azure Backup is rated 7.8, while Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Backup writes "Straightforward to set up and manage and allows us to monitor all backups in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". Azure Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect and Veritas NetBackup, whereas Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Veeam Backup & Replication. See our Azure Backup vs. Iron Mountain Connect report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.