AWS Lake Formation vs Infobright DB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
5,000 views|4,178 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Ignite Technologies Logo
234 views|171 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Lake Formation and Infobright DB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Cloud Data Warehouse.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Data Warehouse Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is quite good at handling analytics. It's done a good job at helping us centralize them.""It is seamlessly integrated within the AWS ecosystem, making it straightforward to manage access patterns for AWS-native services.""We use AWS Lake Formation typically for the data warehouse.""The solution has many features that are applicable to events such as audits.""The most important advantage in using AWS Lake Formation is its ability to connect the data lake to the other technologies in AWS. This is what I advise my clients."

More AWS Lake Formation Pros →

"It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"

More Infobright DB Pros →

Cons
"AWS Lake Formation's pricing could be cheaper.""For the end-users, it's not as user-friendly as it could be.""The solution could make improvements around orchestration and doing some automation stuff on AWS front automation. It would be useful if we could use automation to build images and use hardened images which are CIS compliant.""In our experience what could be improved are not the support, performance or monitoring, but at a managerial level, the very expensive professional services of AWS. This could be an area of improvement for them. It's too expensive to acquire their support.""It falls short when it comes to more granular access control, such as cell-level or row-level entitlements which is a significant drawback for organizations that require precise control over who can access specific rows of data."

More AWS Lake Formation Cons →

"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."

More Infobright DB Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AWS Lake Formation is a bit expensive."
  • More AWS Lake Formation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Our pricing was based on server instances and it was actually very cheap compared to Oracle. I guess you get what you pay for."
  • More Infobright DB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is seamlessly integrated within the AWS ecosystem, making it straightforward to manage access patterns for AWS-native services.
    Top Answer:There are significant challenges when dealing with external applications, and vendors, or pursuing a hybrid cloud strategy because AWS Lake Formation is specific to AWS and does not integrate… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    5,000
    Comparisons
    4,178
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    578
    Rating
    6.0
    Views
    234
    Comparisons
    171
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Infobright
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Lake Formation is a service that makes it easy to set up a secure data lake in days. A data lake is a centralized, curated, and secured repository that stores all your data, both in its original form and prepared for analysis.

    Infobright's high performance analytic database is designed for analyzing large volumes of machine-generated data

    Sample Customers
    bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday
    REZ-1, SonicWALL, IntegriChain, Fuseforward International Inc., Polystar, Live Rail, Mavenir Systems, JDSU Partners, Bango
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    University5%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business70%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise20%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Data Warehouse
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Cloud Data Warehouse. Updated: April 2024.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Lake Formation is ranked 12th in Cloud Data Warehouse with 5 reviews while Infobright DB is ranked 30th in Relational Databases Tools. AWS Lake Formation is rated 7.6, while Infobright DB is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of AWS Lake Formation writes "Strategically aligning data management in a multi-cloud environment with significant reporting challenges". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". AWS Lake Formation is most compared with Snowflake, Azure Data Factory, Amazon Redshift, Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics and BigQuery, whereas Infobright DB is most compared with MySQL and LocalDB.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.