AWS Lake Formation vs Snowflake comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
5,155 views|4,294 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Snowflake Computing Logo
21,992 views|12,495 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Snowflake and AWS Lake Formation based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

In summary, Snowflake is praised for its high performance, scalability, user-friendly interface, and efficient customer support. Users find Snowflake's pricing reasonable and appreciate its positive ROI. On the other hand, AWS Lake Formation is lauded for its flexible pricing, excellent data management capabilities, comprehensive security measures, and seamless integration with other AWS services. Users value its efficient setup process and commendable customer service. Areas for improvement in AWS Lake Formation include usability, access permissions management, data processing speed, documentation, data integration options, and customization features.

Features: Snowflake's valuable features include high performance, scalability, and ease of use. Users appreciate its ability to handle large data volumes quickly. In contrast, AWS Lake Formation offers excellent data management capabilities, comprehensive security measures, and seamless integration with other AWS services. Users enjoy the simple setup process and robust access control mechanisms, ensuring reliable data management and efficient workflows.

Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Snowflake is seen as reasonable and competitive, with a straightforward and uncomplicated process. Users appreciate the flexible licensing terms and options. On the other hand, AWS Lake Formation offers a flexible and cost-effective pricing model, with a straightforward and hassle-free setup cost. Users value the licensing options provided., The user reviews for Snowflake indicate a positive and beneficial ROI. Similarly, AWS Lake Formation also provides a significant ROI with positive results reported by users.

Room for Improvement: Snowflake has room for improvement in specific areas to enhance user experience and functionality. AWS Lake Formation, on the other hand, needs enhancements in usability, access permissions management, data processing speed, troubleshooting resources, data integration options, and feature customization.

Deployment and customer support: The reviews highlight that when evaluating the duration required for a new tech solution, Snowflake users emphasize distinguishing between deployment and setup phases, while AWS Lake Formation users have varying timeframes for deployment, setup, and implementation, suggesting that these phases should be considered separately., Snowflake's customer service has received positive feedback for promptness and effectiveness. Users appreciate the expertise and helpful guidance provided by the support team. AWS Lake Formation's customer service is also commendable, with users valuing their responsiveness, expertise, and commitment to customer success.

The summary above is based on 43 interviews we conducted recently with Snowflake and AWS Lake Formation users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Lake Formation vs. Snowflake Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution has many features that are applicable to events such as audits.""The most important advantage in using AWS Lake Formation is its ability to connect the data lake to the other technologies in AWS. This is what I advise my clients.""We use AWS Lake Formation typically for the data warehouse.""It is seamlessly integrated within the AWS ecosystem, making it straightforward to manage access patterns for AWS-native services.""The solution is quite good at handling analytics. It's done a good job at helping us centralize them."

More AWS Lake Formation Pros →

"The product's most important feature is unloading data to S3.""The features I found most valuable with this solution are sharing options and built-in time zone conversion.""The solution is very stable.""Snowflake has a variety of other ETL provisions that they provide. You can use your own ETL pipeline. Additionally, they provide adapters, and they are always evolving, it is a well-developed solution.""It's ultra-fast at handling queries, which is what we find very convenient.""The solution's computing time is less.""The solution is easy to use.""Snowflake is an enormously useful platform. The Snowpipe feature is valuable because it allows us to load terabytes and petabytes of data into the data mart at a very low cost."

More Snowflake Pros →

Cons
"The solution could make improvements around orchestration and doing some automation stuff on AWS front automation. It would be useful if we could use automation to build images and use hardened images which are CIS compliant.""For the end-users, it's not as user-friendly as it could be.""In our experience what could be improved are not the support, performance or monitoring, but at a managerial level, the very expensive professional services of AWS. This could be an area of improvement for them. It's too expensive to acquire their support.""It falls short when it comes to more granular access control, such as cell-level or row-level entitlements which is a significant drawback for organizations that require precise control over who can access specific rows of data.""AWS Lake Formation's pricing could be cheaper."

More AWS Lake Formation Cons →

"Support needs improvement, as it can take several days before you get some initial support.""The UI could improve because sometimes in the security query the UI freezes. We then have to close the window and restart.""If they could bring in some tools for data integration, it would be really great.""Currently, Snowflake doesn't support unstructured data.""The cost is a bit high.""They need to incorporate some basic OLAP capabilities in the backend or at the database level. Currently, it is purely a database. They call it purely a data warehouse for the cloud. Currently, just like any database, we have to calculate all the KPIs in the front-end tools. The same KPIs again need to be calculated in Snowflake. It would be very helpful if they can include some OLAP features. This will bring efficiency because we will be able to create the KPIs within Snowflake itself and then publish them to multiple front-end tools. We won't have to recreate the same in each project. There should be the ability to automate raised queries, which is currently not possible. There should also be something for Exception Aggregation and things like that.""The solution could improve by allowing non-structured data, such as PDFs, images, or videos. We cannot see the data.""Snowflake could improve if they had an Operational Data Store(ODS) space."

More Snowflake Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AWS Lake Formation is a bit expensive."
  • More AWS Lake Formation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing can be confusing for customers."
  • "The whole licensing system is based on credit points. You can also make a license agreement with the company so that you buy credit points and then you use them. What you do not use in one year can be carried over to the next year."
  • "You pay based on the data that you are storing in the data warehouse and there are no maintenance costs."
  • "It is not cheap."
  • "The pricing for Snowflake is competitive."
  • "On average, with the number of queries that we run, we pay approximately $200 USD per month."
  • "Pricing is approximately $US 50 per DB. Terabyte is around $US 50 per month."
  • "The price of Snowflake is very reasonable."
  • More Snowflake Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is seamlessly integrated within the AWS ecosystem, making it straightforward to manage access patterns for AWS-native services.
    Top Answer:There are significant challenges when dealing with external applications, and vendors, or pursuing a hybrid cloud strategy because AWS Lake Formation is specific to AWS and does not integrate… more »
    Top Answer:The best thing about Snowflake is its flexibility in changing warehouse sizes or computational power.
    Top Answer:The real-time streaming feature is limited with Snowflake and could be improved. Currently, Snowflake doesn't support unstructured data. With Snowflake, you need to be very particular about the type… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    5,155
    Comparisons
    4,294
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    578
    Rating
    6.0
    1st
    Views
    21,992
    Comparisons
    12,495
    Reviews
    36
    Average Words per Review
    464
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Snowflake Computing
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Lake Formation is a service that makes it easy to set up a secure data lake in days. A data lake is a centralized, curated, and secured repository that stores all your data, both in its original form and prepared for analysis.

    Snowflake is a cloud-based data warehousing solution for storing and processing data, generating reports and dashboards, and as a BI reporting source. It is used for optimizing costs and using financial data, as well as for migrating data from on-premises to the cloud. The solution is often used as a centralized data warehouse, combining data from multiple sources.

    Snowflake has helped organizations improve query performance, store and process JSON and XML, consolidate multiple databases into one unified table, power company-wide dashboards, increase productivity, reduce processing time, and have easy maintenance with good technical support.

    Its platform is made up of three components:

    1. Cloud services - Snowflake uses ANSI SQL to empower users to optimize their data and manage their infrastructure, while Snowflake handles the security and encryption of stored data.
    2. Query processing - Snowflake's compute layer is made up of virtual cloud data warehouses that let you analyze data through requests. Each of the warehouses does not compete for computing resources, nor do they affect the performance of each other.
    3. Database storage - Snowflake automatically manages all parts of the data storage process, including file size, compression, organization, structure, metadata, and statistics.

    Snowflake has many valuable vital features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Snowflake architecture provides nearly unlimited scalability and high speed because it uses a single elastic performance engine. The solution also supports unlimited concurrent users and workloads, from interactive to batch.
    • Snowflake makes automation easy and enables enterprises to automate data management, security, governance, availability, and data resiliency.
    • With seamless cross-cloud and cross-region connections, Snowflake eliminates ETL and data silos. Anyone who needs access to shared secure data can get a single copy via the data cloud. In addition, Snowflake makes remote collaboration and decision-making fast and easy via a single shared data source.
    • Snowflake’s Data Marketplace offers third-party data, which allows you to connect with Snowflake customers to extend workflows with data services and third-party applications.

    There are many benefits to implementing Snowflake. It helps optimize costs, reduce downtime, improve operational efficiency, and automate data replication for fast recovery, and it is built for high reliability and availability.

      Below are quotes from interviews we conducted with users currently using the Snowflake solution:

      Sreenivasan R., Director of Data Architecture and Engineering at Decision Minds, says, "Data sharing is a good feature. It is a majorly used feature. The elastic computing is another big feature. Separating computing and storage gives you flexibility. It doesn't require much DBA involvement because it doesn't need any performance tuning. We are not doing any performance tuning, and the entire burden of performance and SQL tuning is on Snowflake. Its usability is very good. I don't need to ramp up any user, and its onboarding is easier. You just onboard the user, and you are done with it. There are simple SQL and UI, and people are able to use this solution easily. Ease of use is a big thing in Snowflake."

      A director of business operations at a logistics company mentions, "It requires no maintenance on our part. They handle all that. The speed is phenomenal. The pricing isn't really anything more than what you would be paying for a SQL server license or another tool to execute the same thing. We have zero maintenance on our side to do anything and the speed at which it performs queries and loads the data is amazing. It handles unstructured data extremely well, too. So, if the data is in a JSON array or an XML, it handles that super well."

      A Solution Architect at a wholesaler/distributor comments, "The ability to share the data and the ability to scale up and down easily are the most valuable features. The concept of data sharing and data plumbing made it very easy to provide and share data. The ability to refresh your Dev or QA just by doing a clone is also valuable. It has the dynamic scale up and scale down feature. Development and deployment are much easier as compared to other platforms where you have to go through a lot of stuff. With a tool like DBT, you can do modeling and transformation within a single tool and deploy to Snowflake. It provides continuous deployment and continuous integration abilities. There is a separation of storage and compute, so you only get charged for your usage. You only pay for what you use. When we share the data downstream with business partners, we can specifically create compute for them, and we can charge back the business."

      Sample Customers
      bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday
      Accordant Media, Adobe, Kixeye Inc., Revana, SOASTA, White Ops
      Top Industries
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm21%
      Computer Software Company13%
      Manufacturing Company8%
      Healthcare Company5%
      REVIEWERS
      Computer Software Company29%
      Financial Services Firm20%
      Healthcare Company6%
      Manufacturing Company6%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Educational Organization26%
      Financial Services Firm13%
      Computer Software Company10%
      Manufacturing Company6%
      Company Size
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business17%
      Midsize Enterprise10%
      Large Enterprise73%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business24%
      Midsize Enterprise20%
      Large Enterprise55%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business15%
      Midsize Enterprise34%
      Large Enterprise51%
      Buyer's Guide
      AWS Lake Formation vs. Snowflake
      March 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Lake Formation vs. Snowflake and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
      768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      AWS Lake Formation is ranked 12th in Cloud Data Warehouse with 5 reviews while Snowflake is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Warehouse with 92 reviews. AWS Lake Formation is rated 7.6, while Snowflake is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS Lake Formation writes "Strategically aligning data management in a multi-cloud environment with significant reporting challenges". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Snowflake writes "Good usability, good data sharing and elastic compute features, and requires less DBA involvement". AWS Lake Formation is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Amazon Redshift, Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, BigQuery and Amazon EMR, whereas Snowflake is most compared with BigQuery, Azure Data Factory, Teradata, Vertica and Amazon EMR. See our AWS Lake Formation vs. Snowflake report.

      See our list of best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors.

      We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.