AWS Auto Scaling vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and IBM are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7, while IBM is ranked #56. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to IBM’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of IBM users who would recommend it.

AWS Auto Scaling

Read 22 AWS Auto Scaling reviews

802 Views
754 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews

829 Views
804 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

AWS Auto Scaling

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

The comparison between IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and AWS Auto Scaling in the IT management category highlights different strengths. Based on the results, AWS Auto Scaling has an upper hand in features and ease of deployment, while IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is noted for its cost-efficient pricing and customer support.

What features are offered by IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, detailed performance analytics, and extensive customization options. AWS Auto Scaling provides seamless scalability, integration with other AWS services, and advanced automation features.

What areas of improvement can be found in IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager needs a more intuitive configuration process, better third-party integrations, and a simplified learning curve. AWS Auto Scaling requires improved documentation, more flexible scaling policies, and user-friendly interfaces.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager deployment is complex with a steep learning curve, but offers responsive customer service. AWS Auto Scaling has a straightforward deployment process, easy setup, and effective customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to AWS Auto Scaling?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has reasonable setup costs and offers solid ROI. AWS Auto Scaling, while more expensive, provides advanced capabilities justified by its potential for significant long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

14th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

56th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Auto Scaling	0.4%
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager	0.6%
Other	99.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ishaka Michael Efe

DevOps Engineer Intern at HNG Tech

Automation has simplified traffic management and improved workload efficiency

I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it is very good. I can't really say for certain what should be improved because I haven't really explored it a lot. However, what I've been using it for has been very good. If there could be training for AWS Auto Scaling, that would be fine. If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help. If there could be more documentation and training on it, that would be beneficial.

Read full review

Christian Campos

Sales manager at Prodeo Innovation

Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features

Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Auto Scaling is a cool feature that works well and its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful."

"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."

"I would highly recommend Auto Scaling to others because it is a fantastic feature that simplifies scaling processes and makes deployment efficient."

"AWS Auto Scaling is very good for managing traffic and creating new instances when necessary."

"AWS Auto Scaling is cost-effective and very useful for businesses."

"The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. When it reaches seventy percent, it sends me an email notification."

"It efficiently handles traffic, ensuring we are not running expenses and the infrastructure is strong enough to handle the load."

"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."

More AWS Auto Scaling pros

"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."

"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."

Cons

"It is sometimes very critical to deploy on AWS since some servers are already running in the background. There are challenges for employees on how to deploy at a given time."

"The billing and cost optimization of the solution could be improved."

"It requires a downtime before deploying the Auto Scaling group."

"In comparison to other public clouds, the product is costly."

"The speed of the solution must be improved."

"The only area of improvement is the speed at which servers are launched. When cleaning up to six servers at a time, it can take up to 15 to 20 minutes to launch new servers."

"Setting up the configuration involves too much work for the cloud engineer."

"There hasn't been a need for improvements."

More AWS Auto Scaling cons

"The user interface was not good."

"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."

"The product is expensive."

"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."

"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."

"The product has moderate pricing."

"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."

"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."

"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

27%

Government

11%

Healthcare Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?

The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?

I'm not sure about the pricing aspect of AWS Auto Scaling or the cost of it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 30% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 30% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 22% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs AWS Auto Scaling

Compared 18% of the time

More AWS Auto Scaling Competitors

Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 20% of the time

IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 18% of the time

Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 13% of the time

meshIQ Platform vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 13% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

Download AWS Auto Scaling product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report

Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling

Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Overview

AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.

IBM

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Michelin Tire Corp

Buyer's Guide

AWS Auto Scaling vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Auto Scaling vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.