Avaya IX Meetings vs Cisco TelePresence comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Avaya Logo
246 views|113 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Cisco Logo
1,020 views|576 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Avaya IX Meetings and Cisco TelePresence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Avaya IX Meetings vs. Cisco TelePresence Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is very easy to jump from one communication channel to another one. It is pretty clear and very easy to do. That is the thing that I like the most from Avaya and their suite.""Interesting collaboration features.""I like the share information function."

More Avaya IX Meetings Pros →

"It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.""The configuration is a valuable.""We have a dual screen option to enable video and content sharing.""TelePresence allows our customers to have a quick meeting while traveling and still be effective. It saves time and money.""The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature.""PresenterTrack cameras improve the meeting experience.""Telepresence's most valuable feature is keeping highly paid employees, such as executives, on the ground instead of wasting time flying around the world. So if you have the right telepresence plan and form, it's not just the video cameras and the systems behind them, it's the way you lay out your meeting room.You can have multiple offices interconnecting in a single meeting, and it looks like everybody's in the same big conference room together because the telepresence yields such a fantastic amount of clarity.""The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary."

More Cisco TelePresence Pros →

Cons
"There isn't too much information about Avaya solutions and that could be very much improved. If you want some product support, you have to go through a business partner in Latin America and there aren't many partners.""Increase in participant numbers reduces quality of video and sound.""The installation could be more straightforward. I would like it to work with other meeting software in the next release."

More Avaya IX Meetings Cons →

"MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability.""The tool is expensive.""The calling features can be improved.""I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy.""I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added.""The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced."

More Cisco TelePresence Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I'm using a subscription. The price is reasonable. It costs about $20 a year."
  • More Avaya IX Meetings Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Cisco TelePresence license is expensive and should be reduced. There is only a cost for the license and it is annually."
  • "I will rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "The pricing is expensive, therefore I rate it an eight out of ten."
  • "We used high definition, 1080p, but again, it required license purchases. For example, with three licenses (TP licenses), each allowing one 1080p screen, if I had six participants, I'd need to lower the resolution to 720p or lower to accommodate more participants. More licenses meant more cost."
  • More Cisco TelePresence Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I like the share information function.
    Top Answer:The installation could be more straightforward. I would like it to work with other meeting software in the next release.
    Top Answer:I use Avaya IX Meetings to engage in meetings with customers and partners.
    Top Answer:It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:There can be some features to enhance the collaboration. For example, with 50 participants using physical devices, some might want to join from other software like Teams, Link, or Skype. That wasn't… more »
    Top Answer:Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.
    Ranking
    19th
    out of 63 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    246
    Comparisons
    113
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    285
    Rating
    8.0
    10th
    out of 63 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    1,020
    Comparisons
    576
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    374
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Flare, Avaya Flare
    TelePresence
    Learn More
    Overview

    Allow users to participate in the context of where they are and what they're doing. Easily connect and communicate to get the most out of every meeting.

    Cisco TelePresence Server brings multiparty video to unified communications deployments. Its flexible video, audio, and content-sharing capabilities allow users to participate in video conferences with multiple parties. Users can easily create, launch, and join meetings using standards-based video endpoints. Or their mobile devices or Cisco WebEx clients. Or even third-party video endpoints. The server provides high-quality, standards-based video conferencing for mobile, desktop, and room systems.
    Sample Customers
    ReSource POS, Ballantyne Strong, Landmark Bank, St George Bank, Pan Pacific Hotels Group, Bank Mega
    Afni, AGCO, Bellevue, Came Group, Children's Hospital of Orange County (CHOC Children's), Del Papa Distributing, Instituto Zaldivar, ING Bank, Moffitt Cancer Center, Park Nicollet, Pentana Solutions Australia, San Jose State University, Sub-Zero Wolf, Transwestern and Metropolis Investment Holdings, Vital Images
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company43%
    Manufacturing Company29%
    Paper And Forest Products14%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    University9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Avaya IX Meetings vs. Cisco TelePresence
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Avaya IX Meetings vs. Cisco TelePresence and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Avaya IX Meetings is ranked 19th in Virtual Meetings with 3 reviews while Cisco TelePresence is ranked 10th in Virtual Meetings with 7 reviews. Avaya IX Meetings is rated 8.4, while Cisco TelePresence is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Avaya IX Meetings writes "A virtual meeting software with a useful share information function". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco TelePresence writes "A scalable solution that needs some improvement in pricing and stability". Avaya IX Meetings is most compared with , whereas Cisco TelePresence is most compared with Zoom, Webex, Polycom RealPresence Clariti and Cisco Meeting Server. See our Avaya IX Meetings vs. Cisco TelePresence report.

    See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.

    We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.