We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and Rocket Zeke based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."The most valuable feature of AutoSys Workload Automation is batch processing."
"Inherit Dependencies feature reduces scheduling errors for holiday processing."
"It can run an object on our Windows systems or our Unix systems, and then send messages to the other system when they are complete."
"The capabilities of the product to schedule on multiple platforms, multiple operating systems."
"I find that it provides better agility in regards to job execution features."
"The solution has been stable."
"The CA workload agent has gotten much better. For our organization it's important for us to communicate in a secure fashion between the host and the other platforms, and we are able to do that with our CA product"
"It scales very well. We can add jobs and remove jobs. We do not have problems maintaining the product across multiple environments and multiple servers."
"Two features are valuable. One is Rocket Zeke's ability to integrate with the mainframe, which is the main processor using the agent. It works on any computer, so users don't have to wait. They can use their laptop or any other way to connect and securely access all the necessary information. The other valuable feature is automation, which is an integral part of batch processing."
"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve the integration."
"Pricing model for distributed should have an Enterprise option."
"There is a difference between a web interface and the thick client interface. We particularly like a thick client interface, and it has gone away."
"Some support issues need to be addressed, but not through email, through personal contact via phone or WebEx."
"More benefits with the agent upgrades, and that's about it. Other than that we have no complaints with it. It's been awesome."
"SQL server clustering is not supported."
"The graphical interface can be improved."
"I would like to see two-factor authentication, since you see a lot of companies in the news for security breaches. That is a really big thing for us."
"I work a lot with the support side when there are issues. I see a lot of confusion about the various licenses. The licensing model is somewhat complicated. The product license has to be installed. Sometimes, when a license is expiring and I need a new one, it's hard to understand where those licenses are in the guest support portal. I've discussed this with Rocket Zeke, and they've acknowledged that it's too complicated."
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while Rocket Zeke is ranked 18th in Workload Automation with 1 review. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while Rocket Zeke is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rocket Zeke writes "It's a reliable solution that gets a lot done quickly". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation, whereas Rocket Zeke is most compared with Rocket Zena, Control-M, Tidal by Redwood and CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.