Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] vs SAS rPath [EOL] comparison

Broadcom and SAS are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution.
SAS rPath [EOL]
Read 1 SAS rPath [EOL] review
    0% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] and SAS rPath [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: January 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Release Automation
    January 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Automic Continuous Delivery...
    Average Rating
    8.0
    Number of Reviews
    13
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
    SAS rPath [EOL]
    Average Rating
    5.0
    Number of Reviews
    1
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    reviewer895359 - PeerSpot reviewer
    reviewer895359
    Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
    Automatic installation for complex deployments and environments, with good workflow support
    I like that really complex deployments are possible with it. It's very good. You have everything you need. You can design your workflows for your needs. You can do so much more, it's not just an automatic installation tool. It's a real deployment tool. I can do the complete deployment with everything that is possible.
    Read full review
    it_user172788 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user172788
    Senior Software Engineer at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Be sure of what you want before implementation as it can be costly to correct a mistake.
    rBuilder Packaging and Automation I Integrated rBuilder with Jenkins and setup a Continuous Deployment API, deployment options, and the documentation. 2.5 years Yes, as did not support platforms like ubuntu. No issues encountered We did not test scalability Customer Service: Customer Service…
    Read full review
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business2
    Midsize Enterprise2
    Large Enterprise9
    No data available
     

    Comparisons

    UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo
    UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]
    Compared 26% of the time
    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo
    Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]
    Compared 26% of the time
    AWS CodeStar vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo
    AWS CodeStar vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]
    Compared 23% of the time
    Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo
    Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]
    Compared 13% of the time
    Nolio Release Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo
    Nolio Release Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]
    Compared 13% of the time
    More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Competitors
    No data available
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]
    February 2026
    Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] reportDownload Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Release Automation
    January 2026
    SAS rPath [EOL] reportDownload SAS rPath [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform
    rPath
     

    Overview

    Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar. 

    Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

    Broadcom
    rPath is specialized in automating the assembly, provisioning and updating of diverse operating systems and middleware platforms and application stacks throughout enterprises.
    SAS
     

    Sample Customers

    BET365, Charter Communications, TASC
    Kaiser Permanente, Local Government Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles County DPSS, Lotte.com Nantes University Hospital Center, National Bank of Greece, National Board of Social Services
    Buyer's Guide
    Release Automation
    January 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: January 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.