We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why
  • Home
  • Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs. Digital.ai Agility

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation vs Digital.ai Agility comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Good interface, excellent event monitoring, and capability to scale
We are able to integrate all used platforms including IBM Mainframe for file transfers.
Anonymous User
The features and capabilities are great and come with excellent customer support
It has accelerated issue resolution and reduced lead times. It has helped to increase communication. From a high-level perspective, it has... Read more →
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: January 2022.
Download now
564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"You can design your workflows for your needs.""The event monitor is very good. You can monitor when the file is created so you can pick up the file once it's done.""The IT process automation is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pros →

"It can generate reports showing a burndown chart, burnup chart, and the planned vs actual velocity.""For visualization capabilities, the automation capabilities make it possible to support the different personas. The features and capabilities are excellent and come with excellent support."

More Digital.ai Agility Pros →

Cons
"There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them.""The stability of the solution can be improved.""Not a perfect ten because the user interface is brand new and it needs improvement."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Cons →

"The machine learning features are a new capability but could be improved. This is being worked by Digital.ai currently. Multicolor simulation, specifically, could be improved.""The user interface can be improved by adding Save, Edit, Add, Cancel, and Return buttons to the popup windows that are displayed when you click on a child item."

More Digital.ai Agility Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Customers often complain about the price."

    • More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You get what you pay for. Don't let your development teams dictate what the portfolio management team should use as the main tool."

    • More Digital.ai Agility Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Automic Continuous Delivery Automation?
    Top Answer: 
    You can design your workflows for your needs.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automic Continuous Delivery Automation?
    Top Answer: 
    Customers often complain about the price. There are several open-source tools available that can be used, but they don't have all of the capabilities. There are other tools also available with similar… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Automic Continuous Delivery Automation?
    Top Answer: 
    The initial setup can be simplified. It's a bit complex. The stability of the solution can be improved.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What do you like most about Digital.ai Agility?
    Top Answer: 
    It can generate reports showing a burndown chart, burnup chart, and the planned vs actual velocity.
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Agility?
    Top Answer: 
    You get what you pay for. Don't let your development teams dictate what the portfolio management team should use as the main tool.
    What needs improvement with Digital.ai Agility?
    Top Answer: 
    The user interface can be improved by adding Save button to the popup windows that are displayed when you click on a child item. The current behavior is a new tab in your browser opens up and shows… more »
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    1,078
    Comparisons
    766
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    403
    Rating
    7.7
    8th
    out of 32 in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    Views
    1,738
    Comparisons
    1,319
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    529
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform
    VersionOne Lifecycle, VersionOne, CollabNet VersionOne
    Learn More
    Broadcom
    Digital.ai
    Overview

    Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar. 

    Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

    Enterprise business agility rests on agile planning that scales and has the flexibility needed to meet the needs of customers and the market. Digital.ai Agility enables organizations to scale up agile from the team level across the product portfolio, improve collaboration and efficiency, and deliver software that provides more value.

    Offer
    Learn more about Automic Continuous Delivery Automation
    Learn More
    Learn more about Digital.ai Agility
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    BET365, Charter Communications, TASC
    Siemens Health Services (HS), Cerner Corporation, Aaron's, Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, Kelley Blue Book, AOL, Axway, Tideworks, bwin Interactive Entertainment, AG, Intergraph, Eos Group, PeopleCube, Liquid Machines
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm40%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Retailer20%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company37%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company32%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise77%
    No Data Available
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: January 2022.
    Download now
    564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is ranked 8th in Release Automation with 3 reviews while Digital.ai Agility is ranked 8th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 2 reviews. Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is rated 7.6, while Digital.ai Agility is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Automic Continuous Delivery Automation writes "Good interface, excellent event monitoring, and capability to scale". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital.ai Agility writes "Good reporting, offers multiple planning levels and helpful features for iteration planning". Automic Continuous Delivery Automation is most compared with AutoSys Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, UrbanCode Deploy and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Digital.ai Agility is most compared with Jira, Rally Software, TFS, Jira Align and Tasktop Viz.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.