AuraQuantic vs IBM Case Foundation comparison

AuraQuantic and IBM are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. AuraQuantic is ranked #21 with an average rating of 10.0, while IBM is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0. AuraQuantic holds a 0.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to IBM’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AuraQuantic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of IBM users who would recommend it.

AuraQuantic

Read 6 AuraQuantic reviews

458 Views
306 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Case Foundation

Read 13 IBM Case Foundation reviews

298 Views
204 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

AuraQuantic

IBM Case Foundation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

IBM Case Foundation and AuraQuantic are competitors in the business process management space, focusing on workflow automation and efficiency. AuraQuantic has an upper hand due to its extensive feature set and flexibility, enhancing perceived value despite pricing factors.

Features: IBM Case Foundation delivers robust document management, seamless integration with existing systems, and strong stability. AuraQuantic offers advanced workflow automation, comprehensive customization, and zero code user-friendly mode.

Room for Improvement: IBM Case Foundation could enhance flexibility and reduce deployment complexity, as well as improve customization capabilities. AuraQuantic may benefit from expanded document management integration, more detailed analytics, and increased stability in large-scale deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Case Foundation's deployment is complex and requires expert technical setup, although customer support is reliable. AuraQuantic provides a more streamlined cloud-based deployment that reduces downtime, complemented by responsive customer support easing the transition.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Case Foundation demands a substantial initial investment, with higher licensing costs affecting slower ROI due to complex setup. AuraQuantic presents a moderate pricing structure with a faster ROI, thanks to its flexible deployment options and scalable pricing model, presenting a more favorable economic proposition.

To learn more, read our detailed AuraQuantic vs. IBM Case Foundation Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic vs. IBM Case Foundation

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AuraQuantic

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

21st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (18th), Low-Code Development Platforms (17th), No-Code Development Platforms (6th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (11th)

IBM Case Foundation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

32nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AuraQuantic is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Case Foundation is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Emilio Valle

Programmer at Banco de Guatemala

Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable

It helped a lot when we started using it with more images. Before, it was basic. With images, it's more effective. Users consider it more animated and user-friendly. We can easily track a process and know exactly where a process is. It's a low-code application. The solution is very easy to use. It is stable and reliable. The solution scales well. Technical support is extremely responsive.

Read full review

Nouman Nawaz

Deputy Director - IT(Plans) at DHA Lahore

Mature product in terms of security and stable product

The architecture is a bit difficult, but in BAW, they introduced the Business Automation Workflow. It's a bit easier compared to Case Manager. Currently, we use Case Manager, so it's a bit difficult to upgrade and handle, but BAW is comparatively much better and easier to handle. The limitation is only for customization because IBM doesn't support it. In some scenarios, if you want some business processes to be customized, we have already spoken two or three times with IBM representatives that we have to customize some of the features in this business process. They would say that if you want to do this automation at your own end, then okay, fine, go ahead, but we are not supporting all this customization. The only thing is the customization because it's a complete standard application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."

"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."

"It's a low-code application."

"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."

"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."

"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."

"It provides us the capability of producing business processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository."

"The solution is scalable."

"It's very easy."

"A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting."

"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."

"It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events."

More IBM Case Foundation pros

Cons

"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."

"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."

"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."

"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."

"There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer"

"IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM."

"The cloud version could use more stability."

"The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications."

"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."

"Comparing the solution with other interfaces, IBM BPM is much better than Case Foundation. They need to make this solution's interface more user-friendly."

"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."

"The solution can be quite expensive."

More IBM Case Foundation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be better. It's quite expensive."

"The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either."

"IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."

"Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."

"This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

19%

Insurance Company

12%

Government

10%

University

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about IBM Case Foundation?

A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Case Foundation?

It was affordable, but right now, ten years later, the cost of the product is extremely high. That's why we are looking for another product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Case Foundation?

See all answers

Comparisons

Appian vs AuraQuantic

Compared 45% of the time

Camunda vs AuraQuantic

Compared 30% of the time

Bizagi vs AuraQuantic

Compared 24% of the time

More AuraQuantic Competitors

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 100% of the time

More IBM Case Foundation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic

May 2025

Download AuraQuantic product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Case Foundation

April 2025

Download IBM Case Foundation product report

Also Known As

No data available

Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager

Overview

AuraQuantic is a digital platform designed for business users to easily and rapidly build unlimited processes and applications to automate end-to-end operations, reducing costs and optimizing productivity.

AuraQuantic is a no-code platform for building the enterprise solutions that drive Digital Transformation.

Interface

Delight users with attractive interfaces across multiple devices and deliver the best user experience. Respond immediately to their ever-changing needs with the agility provided by the platform and its no-code changes on the fly.

Logic

This is the most powerful part of any application. This is why AuraQuantic offers a long list of built-in, no-code functionalities.

Data

To manage application and process data models, AuraQuantic provides a visual data model designer and supports importing data schemas.

Application Governance

Access rights management (to apps and app development), Application metadata collection, Application performance monitoring, Application works dashboard, Custom ‘guardrails’ for practitioners/developers, Role-based access control to data and services for app dev, Multiple practitioners/developers for a single app and across the platform.

Business Analytics

Digital Decisioning features aim to inform and automate operational decisions. These decisions continue to increase in amount and complexity due to growing customer demands. Business decision automation is a must to keep up with ever-changing customer needs.

Thanks to business activity data collection, using custom applications built with AuraQuantic, the organization is empowered to carry out accurate analysis and act smart by leveraging business insights.

Connectivity

API REST, API SOAP, API DLL
Exposing APIs (process/application logic and decision systems)
Connector builder
REST and SOAP web services connector
External database connectors (Adapters Servers, scripts and stored procedures execution)
.Net Assembly connector Connectors with Artificial Intelligence services (AI)
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) service connectors
More built-in connectors (50+)
Microsoft Office 365, Google Suite, SAP…

AuraQuantic

IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.

IBM

Sample Customers

Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.

Suncorp Group Limited

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic vs. IBM Case Foundation

April 2025

Free Report: AuraQuantic vs. IBM Case Foundation

Find out what your peers are saying about AuraQuantic vs. IBM Case Foundation and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AuraQuantic vs. IBM Case Foundation report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.