We performed a comparison between Auconet Network Access Control and Portnox CORE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC).Earn 20 points
Auconet Network Access Control is ranked 19th in Network Access Control (NAC) while Portnox CORE is ranked 11th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 14 reviews. Auconet Network Access Control is rated 8.0, while Portnox CORE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Auconet Network Access Control writes "A very good Network Access Control application with emphasis on MAC layer authentication". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox CORE writes "Simple UI, easy deployment but slow authentication times for devices". Auconet Network Access Control is most compared with , whereas Portnox CORE is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform and Portnox Clear.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.