Arcserve UDP vs NovaStor NovaBACKUP comparison

Arcserve and NovaStor are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Arcserve is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.0, while NovaStor is ranked #33 with an average rating of 9.0. Arcserve holds a 1.2% mindshare in BRS, compared to NovaStor’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Arcserve users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NovaStor users who would recommend it.

Arcserve UDP

Read 43 Arcserve UDP reviews

2,516 Views
1,455 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

NovaStor NovaBACKUP

Read 3 NovaStor NovaBACKUP reviews

352 Views
153 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Arcserve UDP

NovaStor NovaBACKUP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Arcserve UDP and NovaStor NovaBACKUP are competitive data protection solutions. Arcserve UDP seems to have the upper hand with easier deployment and reliable support, while NovaStor NovaBACKUP stands out for its robust feature set despite its higher price.

Features: Arcserve UDP is praised for comprehensive backup, disaster recovery, and ease of use. NovaStor NovaBACKUP stands out for supporting various platforms, granular restore capabilities, and its robust feature set.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest enhancements in Arcserve UDP's performance during large backups, scheduling options, and overall performance. NovaStor NovaBACKUP could improve its speed, user documentation, and should focus on optimizing performance and guides.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arcserve UDP is noted for its straightforward deployment and reliable support. NovaStor NovaBACKUP's deployment is slightly more complex but offset by detailed configuration options and efficient customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Users find Arcserve UDP to be cost-effective with a good return on investment. NovaStor NovaBACKUP's initial cost is higher, but its extensive features justify the price.

To learn more, read our detailed Arcserve UDP vs. NovaStor NovaBACKUP Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP vs. NovaStor NovaBACKUP

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arcserve UDP

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

19th

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NovaStor NovaBACKUP

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

33rd

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

19th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Arcserve UDP is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NovaStor NovaBACKUP is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

TeresitaSabile

Head of Operation and IT at Elgrade Inc

Cost savings and efficient decompression but needs better cloud integration

Our primary use case for Arcserve UDP is its decompression feature, which helped us save money by reducing storage needs. Despite moving to cloud applications, we have been using Arcserve UDP for backup and disaster recovery Arcserve UDP has helped our organization save considerable amounts of…

Read full review

Rainer Kummerfeldt

IT-Teamleader at Bechtle

Easy to work and offers features for tape backups, disk backups, and whatever you want

NovaStor NovaBACKUP is still working on new features because they listen to the customers and integrate their needs into new versions. You can see they make progress with each new version. They are much faster than IBM, where you sometimes have to wait years for new features. It is very quick and fast. NovaStor have big competitors like Veeam, which is very fast and aggressive. It's good, but it depends on the price. I think NovaStor might be cheaper. They have a direct connection to their developers and sales teams, which makes getting answers very fast. Veeam has a lot of features, like a special reporting tool. However, I've heard from some customers that Veeam wasn't always the right decision because it couldn't work with their environment. But Veeam has aggressive marketing, which is why they are probably in first place at the moment, besides Commvault. IBM has lost its competitive edge and is trying to catch up, but it might be too late.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The data protection functionality is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"One of the things that I do like about it is that it has a very good deduplication feature."

"The recovery part of the product is very good."

"The most valuable feature of StorageCraft ShadowProtect is the speed and the compression of the backups. The compressed backed-up files do not take up as much storage. Additionally, the incremental backups can be done in one minute and be backed up on a disc very fast."

"The standard backup and restore feature is most used."

"It is very stable."

"There are many backup options available in this solution. For example, you are able to do backups of servers, email, OST files, and users. This is a complete backup solution which is very good."

"It allows us to back up all the servers and centrally manage them."

More Arcserve UDP pros

"It's the easiest way to configure it."

"It is a very good and easy-to-use tool for non-technical people."

Cons

"We cannot restore each user's mailbox. Each user's mailbox should be independently restorable. Also, this solution is very slow. If you select all of the servers, it runs for a long time... It needs to be faster. Finally, If anything happens to one server we should be able to switch to another server."

"In the most recent version of premium plus the replication has been removed, and it should re-added to the solution."

"We have to use a Microsoft hypervisor for installation which is expensive."

"The only problem with the solution is that when I change the drive capacity, it has to do a full backup. It's a problem when I have five servers to backup. When I only want to change the size of the drive, I have to do a full backup that can take one week."

"Backups are very slow and time consuming."

"It should be easier to switch between backup locations. We have multiple data storage locations and sometimes one of those storages need to be replaced. It would be nice if they made it easier to reconfigure the backup configuration."

"The initial setup was complex."

"I don't know whether the tool has VMware integrations. It would be good to cover this area if it doesn't have those."

More Arcserve UDP cons

"The room for improvement lies in the compatibility of NovaBACKUP with older operating systems."

"The price of NovaStor NovaBACKUP is an area that can be considered as a weakness or drawback, where improvements are required."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very expensive."

"The solution is expensive."

"It is approximately $400 to purchase a virtual service outright."

"In comparison to other vendors, it is a low-cost solution."

"The pricing is moderate."

"The price of StorageCraft ShadowProtect is competitive in the market."

"I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization."

"There is an annual license required for this solution and it is priced well."

More Arcserve UDP pricing and cost advice

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the solution's maintenance and support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Non Profit

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Major Differences Between These 4 Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions?

Comparing the features of the four is not the right approach. You need to develop a list of requirements for backup and DR that are specific to your organization and then compare each of the four ...

See all answers

What do you like most about StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

The interface is very refined, works fine, and is very intuitive most of the time. Scalability is nice. The multi-tenancy feature is very welcome. The integration with Linux works fine too.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StorageCraft ShadowProtect?

Pricing for SPX MRP/MSP is under $400 per server (Single VM) with a 1-year subscription. After discounts, it could decrease by 20%-30%, and opting for a 3/5/10 server pack may offer even better (lo...

See all answers

What do you like most about NovaStor NovaBACKUP?

It is a very good and easy-to-use tool for non-technical people.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NovaStor NovaBACKUP?

My company has to make yearly payments towards the solution's maintenance and support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NovaStor NovaBACKUP?

The room for improvement lies in the compatibility of NovaBACKUP with older operating systems like Windows XP. Some customers still rely on outdated systems due to specific production requirements....

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 37% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 11% of the time

Rubrik vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 9% of the time

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 5% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs Arcserve UDP

Compared 5% of the time

More Arcserve UDP Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs NovaStor NovaBACKUP

Compared 75% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs NovaStor NovaBACKUP

Compared 25% of the time

More NovaStor NovaBACKUP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP

June 2025

Download Arcserve UDP product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

May 2025

Download NovaStor NovaBACKUP product report

Also Known As

StorageCraft ShadowProtect, StorageCraft Backup Analyzer

NovaBACKUP

Overview

Arcserve UDP is a comprehensive solution that empowers even a one-person IT department to protect virtual and physical environments with a high degree of simplicity. It allows you to design and manage your entire data protection strategy with a unified management console, and enables you to scale your data backup coverage as your organization grows with the push of a button.

Arcserve

NovaBACKUP is a data protection software that enables SMBÂ users to backup and recover mission critical data across a hybrid of physical and virtual machines. NovaBACKUP is designed to work onÂ Microsoft Windows operating systems, offering local and online file backups and disaster recovery image backups.

NovaStor

Sample Customers

ITPS, North Hertfordshire Homes, SEMIKRON, Kajaani University of Applied Sciences, Test Valley Borough Council, EK Services

Ex'pression College, Osborne Wood Products Inc., REIT Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Arcserve UDP vs. NovaStor NovaBACKUP

May 2025

Free Report: Arcserve UDP vs. NovaStor NovaBACKUP

Find out what your peers are saying about Arcserve UDP vs. NovaStor NovaBACKUP and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arcserve UDP vs. NovaStor NovaBACKUP report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.