We performed a comparison between Apiiro and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly."
"The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution."
"The most valuable feature is the connection of threat intelligence information with identified vulnerabilities, which means you can prioritize vulnerabilities according to actual attacks."
"Qualys VM's best features are vulnerability management and customizable scoring."
"Great web application security for scanning."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the external channel."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability scanning, policy compliance scanning, and tablet for web application scanning."
"The process of defining and discovering scans is organized efficiently."
"The reporting functionality is great."
"Provides great functionality."
"User management is a little bit clunky."
"I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git."
"There's a need to upgrade or fix the potential vulnerability rate. Around 20,000 potential vulnerabilities were showing in Qualys VMDR, but none of the other tools showed them. When we checked, it wasn't the case. Support explained that even small issues were being counted as vulnerabilities, causing issues in our audit. So, the security features could be improved to identify vulnerabilities accurately."
"The reporting and dashboards could improve in Qualys VM. However, they have improved since the previous versions."
"I would like to see this solution more developed and competitive in the Cloud space."
"Qualys VM's scanner doesn't pick up every vulnerability, so we have to use multiple scanners to cover that gap."
"Qualys VM should improve its methodology."
"What we have found is that the solution is not closely tied with the patch management. It is okay with newer ones, like Windows 10 machines; it gives the correct patch. But for Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008, it does not give us the correct patch so we have to manually identify the patches. This is a major problem."
"I would like to see more accuracy in detections, better reporting capabilities, and better dashboard download capabilities."
"Reports were lacking somewhat on the customization side."
Apiiro is ranked 10th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 2 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. Apiiro is rated 8.6, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Apiiro writes "A great secrets detection feature, good visibility, and integrates well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Apiiro is most compared with Snyk, Cycode, Ox Security, SonarQube and Checkmarx One, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management. See our Apiiro vs. Qualys VMDR report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
