AWS Fargate vs Apache NiFi comparison

Apache and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Compute Service category. Apache is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7. Apache holds a 9.3% mindshare in CS, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 12.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.

Apache NiFi

Read 13 Apache NiFi reviews

2,013 Views
1,228 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

AWS Fargate

Read 19 AWS Fargate reviews

1,943 Views
1,768 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache NiFi

AWS Fargate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Apache NiFi and AWS Fargate compete in cloud computing, targeting different needs. AWS Fargate has an edge in scalability and infrastructure management for applications focused on flexibility, while Apache NiFi offers superior data transformation and processing capabilities.

Features: Apache NiFi offers intuitive data flow design, extensive connectors for varied data sources, and real-time analytics. AWS Fargate features serverless architecture, seamless AWS service integration, and application scaling flexibility.

Room for Improvement: Apache NiFi could enhance scalability and integration with other cloud environments, improve user-friendly interfaces for non-developers, and reduce complexity in multi-tenant setups. AWS Fargate may improve cost predictability, enhance support for non-AWS environments, and offer better application deployment transparency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Fargate simplifies deployment by abstracting infrastructure, focusing on task management and offering strong AWS ecosystem support. Apache NiFi requires more hands-on deployment, needing dedicated setup resources, which might be challenging for some projects.

Pricing and ROI: Apache NiFi's costs fluctuate based on infrastructure with ROI linked to data processing tasks. AWS Fargate's serverless pricing charges by resource usage, potentially offering higher ROI for applications with variable demands.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Fargate vs. Apache NiFi Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Fargate vs. Apache NiFi

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 866,561 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache NiFi

Ranking in Compute Service

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AWS Fargate

Ranking in Compute Service

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Apache NiFi is 9.3%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Fargate is 12.7%, down from 18.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compute Service Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Fargate	12.7%
Apache NiFi	9.3%
Other	78.0%

Compute Service

Featured Reviews

Bharghava Raghavendra Beesa

Senior Developer at Infosys

The tool enables effective data transformation and integration

There are some areas for improvement, particularly with record-level tasks that take a bit of time. The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversions without a specific process. Enhancing features related to alerting would be helpful, including mobile alerts for pipeline issues. Integration with mobile devices for error alerts would simplify information delivery.

Read full review

Fedir Plotnikov

Senior DevOps Engineer at Blankfactor

Enables quick scaling and reduces infrastructure worries

The best thing about AWS Fargate is that I don't need to worry about the proper provisioning of infrastructure for my task, and it's very fast in terms of scaling my containers; it's much faster than other solutions. From using AWS Fargate, I see benefits such as scaling speed and no headache about the infrastructure provisioning.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Apache NiFi is user-friendly. Its most valuable features for handling large volumes of data include its multitude of integrated endpoints and clients and the ability to create cron jobs to run tasks at regular intervals."

"The most valuable features of this solution are ease of use and implementation."

"The initial setup is very easy. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one point is difficult, and ten points are easy."

"We can integrate the tool with other applications easily."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"It's an automated flow, where you can build a flow from source to destination, then do the transformation in between."

"It is highly effective for handling real-time data by working with APIs for immediate and continuous data extraction."

"The most valuable feature has been the range of clients and the range of connectors that we could use."

More Apache NiFi pros

"Fargate's integration with other AWS services is really good."

"We appreciate the simple use of containers within this solution, it makes managing the containers quick and easy."

"The most valuable feature of Fargate is that it's self-managed. You don't have to configure your own clusters or deploy any Kubernetes clusters. This simplifies the initial deployment and scaling process."

"AWS Fargate automatically scales to meet demand, making it ideal for applications with variable workloads."

"Fargate is beneficial for hosting our solutions and providing workflow management, creating legal documents, and delivering business intelligence."

"The most valuable feature of AWS Fargate is its ease of use."

"All AWS services allow me to manage a wide range of applications and services."

"By using a server's compute resources, one can observe the resource metrics. With AWS, one can determine when servers will be used based on CloudWatch results. For example, CloudWatch informs the application and service platform when the hit ratio has reached the threshold value."

More AWS Fargate pros

Cons

"I think the UI interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversions without a specific process."

"More features must be added to the product."

"There is room for improvement in integration with SSO. For example, NiFi does not have any integration with SSO. And if I want to give some kind of rollback access control across the organization. That is not possible."

"We run many jobs, and there are already large tables. When we do not control NiFi on time, all reports fail for the day. So it's pretty slow to control, and it has to be improved."

"There are some claims that NiFi is cloud-native but we have tested it, and it's not."

"The overall stability of this solution could be improved. In a future release, we would like to have access to more features that could be used in a parallel way. This would provide more freedom with processing."

"The use case templates could be more precise to typical business needs."

More Apache NiFi cons

"AWS Fargate's security features weren't the most important criteria or value we got from AWS Fargate."

"If there are any options to manage containers, that would be good. That relates more to the cost point. For example, over the next three months, I'll be making a comparison between solutions like CAST AI and other software-as-a-service platforms that offer Kubernetes management with an emphasis on cost reduction."

"I would like to see the older dashboard instead of the newer version. I don't like the new dashboard."

"The main area for improvement is the cost, which could be lowered to be more competitive with other major cloud providers."

"Sometimes, Fargate can be really hard to configure."

"There are features that could be added or enhanced."

"I heard from my team that it's not easy to predict the cost. That is the only issue we have with AWS Fargate, but I think that's acceptable. AWS Fargate isn't user-friendly. Anything related to Software as a Service or microservice architecture is not easy to implement. You're required to have DevOps from your side to implement the solution. AWS Fargate is just a temporary solution for us. When we grow to a certain level, we may use AKS for better control."

"As I have not worked with Fargate extensively, I do not have any specific improvements."

More AWS Fargate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open-source."

"We use the free version of Apache NiFi."

"It's an open-source solution."

"I used the tool's free version."

"We would advise that this solution has a slightly-higher price point than others on the market. There is a free plan available for start-ups, but the free and lower range licensing models do not provide the full functionality."

"I rate the price of AWS Fargate a four out of five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

866,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache NiFi?

The initial setup is very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache NiFi?

Apache NiFi is open-source and free. Its integration with systems like Cloudera can be expensive, but Apache NiFi itself presents the best pricing as a standalone tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache NiFi?

The logging system of Apache NiFi needs improvement. It is difficult to debug compared to Airflow ( /products/apache-airflow-reviews ), where task details and issues are clear. With Apache NiFi, I ...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Fargate?

The most valuable feature of Fargate is that it's self-managed. You don't have to configure your own clusters or deploy any Kubernetes clusters. This simplifies the initial deployment and scaling p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Fargate?

Currently, I think that the program is great the way it is, and maybe we use less than 50% of the current features of the platform. For example, we have been evaluating Dask with Python to work wit...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering AWS Fargate?

My team hasn't used AWS Fargate's capability for automatic scaling in our applications, even when they knew about it; they were very new to using these features. AWS Fargate's security features wer...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Lambda vs Apache NiFi

Compared 27% of the time

Google Cloud Dataflow vs Apache NiFi

Compared 22% of the time

Apache Spark vs Apache NiFi

Compared 18% of the time

Amazon EC2 vs Apache NiFi

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Stream Analytics vs Apache NiFi

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache NiFi Competitors

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling vs AWS Fargate

Compared 36% of the time

Heroku vs AWS Fargate

Compared 21% of the time

Amazon EC2 vs AWS Fargate

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Batch vs AWS Fargate

Compared 10% of the time

Apache Spark vs AWS Fargate

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS Fargate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache NiFi

August 2025

Download Apache NiFi product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Fargate

August 2025

Download AWS Fargate product report

Overview

Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Apache

A new compute engine that enables you to use containers as a fundamental compute primitive without having to manage the underlying instances. With Fargate, you don’t need to provision, configure, or scale virtual machines in your clusters to run containers. Fargate can be used with Amazon ECS today, with plans to support Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) in the future.

Fargate has flexible configuration options so you can closely match your application needs and granular, per-second billing.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

Macquarie Telecom Group, Dovestech, Slovak Telekom, Looker, Hastings Group

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Buyer's Guide

AWS Fargate vs. Apache NiFi

July 2025

Free Report: AWS Fargate vs. Apache NiFi

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Fargate vs. Apache NiFi and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

866,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Fargate vs. Apache NiFi report.

See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.