AWS Fargate vs Apache NiFi comparison

Apache and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Compute Service category. Apache is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.7, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5. Apache holds a 8.5% mindshare in CS, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 14.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.

Apache NiFi

Read 13 Apache NiFi reviews

1,553 Views
531 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

AWS Fargate

Read 18 AWS Fargate reviews

2,568 Views
1,414 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache NiFi

AWS Fargate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Apache NiFi and AWS Fargate compete in cloud computing, targeting different needs. AWS Fargate has an edge in scalability and infrastructure management for applications focused on flexibility, while Apache NiFi offers superior data transformation and processing capabilities.

Features: Apache NiFi offers intuitive data flow design, extensive connectors for varied data sources, and real-time analytics. AWS Fargate features serverless architecture, seamless AWS service integration, and application scaling flexibility.

Room for Improvement: Apache NiFi could enhance scalability and integration with other cloud environments, improve user-friendly interfaces for non-developers, and reduce complexity in multi-tenant setups. AWS Fargate may improve cost predictability, enhance support for non-AWS environments, and offer better application deployment transparency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Fargate simplifies deployment by abstracting infrastructure, focusing on task management and offering strong AWS ecosystem support. Apache NiFi requires more hands-on deployment, needing dedicated setup resources, which might be challenging for some projects.

Pricing and ROI: Apache NiFi's costs fluctuate based on infrastructure with ROI linked to data processing tasks. AWS Fargate's serverless pricing charges by resource usage, potentially offering higher ROI for applications with variable demands.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Fargate vs. Apache NiFi Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Fargate vs. Apache NiFi

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,649 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache NiFi

Ranking in Compute Service

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AWS Fargate

Ranking in Compute Service

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Apache NiFi is 8.5%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Fargate is 14.0%, down from 18.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compute Service

Featured Reviews

Bharghava Raghavendra Beesa

Senior Developer at Infosys

The tool enables effective data transformation and integration

There are some areas for improvement, particularly with record-level tasks that take a bit of time. The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversions without a specific process. Enhancing features related to alerting would be helpful, including mobile alerts for pipeline issues. Integration with mobile devices for error alerts would simplify information delivery.

Read full review

Subrata Mukherjee

Senior Technical Architect; Head of Platform at Blenheim Chalcot IT Services India

Boost demand response with cost-efficient serverless architecture

We are a venture builder company, and if we select AWS for our product. Our design is based on a serverless architecture model. ECS Fargate is the most convenient way in terms of scalability, integration, and cost control Thanks to the serverless model and easy integration features, a few…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's an automated flow, where you can build a flow from source to destination, then do the transformation in between."

"The initial setup is very easy. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one point is difficult, and ten points are easy."

"The user interface is good and makes it easy to design very popular workflows."

"The most valuable features of this solution are ease of use and implementation."

"Apache NiFi is user-friendly. Its most valuable features for handling large volumes of data include its multitude of integrated endpoints and clients and the ability to create cron jobs to run tasks at regular intervals."

"We can integrate the tool with other applications easily."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"It is highly effective for handling real-time data by working with APIs for immediate and continuous data extraction."

More Apache NiFi pros

"We appreciate the simple use of containers within this solution, it makes managing the containers quick and easy."

"If you create your deployment with a good set of rules for how to scale in, you can just set it and forget it."

"AWS Fargate is a fully managed service, and it's very easy to use compared to other services like Elastic Beanstalk Service (EBS)."

"I like their containerization service. You can use Docker or something similar and deploy quickly without the know-how related to, for example, Kubernetes. If you use AKS or Kubernetes, then you have to have the know-how. But for Fargate, you don't need to have the know-how there. You just deploy the container or the image, and then you have the container, and you can use it as AWS takes care of the rest. This makes it easier for those getting started or if you don't have a strong DevOps team inside your organization."

"Fargate itself is a stable product. We are quite satisfied with its performance."

"Fargate's integration with other AWS services is really good."

"The most valuable feature of Fargate is that it's self-managed. You don't have to configure your own clusters or deploy any Kubernetes clusters. This simplifies the initial deployment and scaling process."

"AWS Fargate has definitely impacted our organization positively because before that, we couldn't accommodate the workload requirements as flexibly as we can with Fargate."

More AWS Fargate pros

Cons

"The tool should incorporate more tutorials for advanced use cases. It has tutorials for simple use cases."

"There are some claims that NiFi is cloud-native but we have tested it, and it's not."

"We run many jobs, and there are already large tables. When we do not control NiFi on time, all reports fail for the day. So it's pretty slow to control, and it has to be improved."

"The use case templates could be more precise to typical business needs."

"More features must be added to the product."

"There is room for improvement in integration with SSO. For example, NiFi does not have any integration with SSO. And if I want to give some kind of rollback access control across the organization. That is not possible."

"The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversions without a specific process."

"The overall stability of this solution could be improved. In a future release, we would like to have access to more features that could be used in a parallel way. This would provide more freedom with processing."

More Apache NiFi cons

"We faced challenges in vertically scaling our workload."

"I would like to see the older dashboard instead of the newer version. I don't like the new dashboard."

"There is a tool named Compose that helps in converting the Docker Compose file into a Kubernetes file. For ECS and Fargate, AWS reads a Dockerfile and helps with conversion. However, I am uncertain if it's ready for deployment after conversion."

"AWS Fargate could improve the privileged mode containers. We had some problems and they were not able to run."

"I heard from my team that it's not easy to predict the cost. That is the only issue we have with AWS Fargate, but I think that's acceptable. AWS Fargate isn't user-friendly. Anything related to Software as a Service or microservice architecture is not easy to implement. You're required to have DevOps from your side to implement the solution. AWS Fargate is just a temporary solution for us. When we grow to a certain level, we may use AKS for better control."

"We would like to see some improvement in the process documents that are provided with this product, particularly for auto-scaling and other configuration tools that are a bit complicated."

"AWS Fargate needs improvement in terms of setup complexity."

"There are features that could be added or enhanced."

More AWS Fargate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open-source."

"We use the free version of Apache NiFi."

"It's an open-source solution."

"I used the tool's free version."

"We would advise that this solution has a slightly-higher price point than others on the market. There is a free plan available for start-ups, but the free and lower range licensing models do not provide the full functionality."

"I rate the price of AWS Fargate a four out of five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache NiFi?

The initial setup is very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache NiFi?

Apache NiFi is open-source and free. Its integration with systems like Cloudera can be expensive, but Apache NiFi itself presents the best pricing as a standalone tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache NiFi?

The logging system of Apache NiFi needs improvement. It is difficult to debug compared to Airflow ( /products/apache-airflow-reviews ), where task details and issues are clear. With Apache NiFi, I ...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Fargate?

The most valuable feature of Fargate is that it's self-managed. You don't have to configure your own clusters or deploy any Kubernetes clusters. This simplifies the initial deployment and scaling p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Fargate?

Currently, I think that the program is great the way it is, and maybe we use less than 50% of the current features of the platform. For example, we have been evaluating Dask with Python to work wit...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering AWS Fargate?

My team hasn't used AWS Fargate's capability for automatic scaling in our applications, even when they knew about it; they were very new to using these features. AWS Fargate's security features wer...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Lambda vs Apache NiFi

Compared 29% of the time

Google Cloud Dataflow vs Apache NiFi

Compared 26% of the time

Apache Spark vs Apache NiFi

Compared 15% of the time

Azure Stream Analytics vs Apache NiFi

Compared 6% of the time

Apache Storm vs Apache NiFi

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache NiFi Competitors

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling vs AWS Fargate

Compared 39% of the time

Heroku vs AWS Fargate

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Compute Cloud Service vs AWS Fargate

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Batch vs AWS Fargate

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon EC2 vs AWS Fargate

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Fargate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache NiFi

June 2025

Download Apache NiFi product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Fargate

June 2025

Download AWS Fargate product report

Overview

Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Apache

A new compute engine that enables you to use containers as a fundamental compute primitive without having to manage the underlying instances. With Fargate, you don’t need to provision, configure, or scale virtual machines in your clusters to run containers. Fargate can be used with Amazon ECS today, with plans to support Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) in the future.

Fargate has flexible configuration options so you can closely match your application needs and granular, per-second billing.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

Macquarie Telecom Group, Dovestech, Slovak Telekom, Looker, Hastings Group

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Buyer's Guide

AWS Fargate vs. Apache NiFi

June 2025

Free Report: AWS Fargate vs. Apache NiFi

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Fargate vs. Apache NiFi and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Fargate vs. Apache NiFi report.

See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.