On a scale from one to ten, I would rate it around eight. I would recommend using the product based on the specific workloads they are dealing with. For instance, if they have strict sub-second performance requirements, I might not suggest it. The decision depends on their specific requirements, and I would advise accordingly.
AWS Cloud Architect at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 20
2022-12-08T17:15:45Z
Dec 8, 2022
In terms of process documentation and speed, it really depends on what how many CPUs and memory you put in and whether you get adequate speed. For me, it's more than enough. All those functions are primitive functions. They mostly don't need big CPUs and stuff. You just break stuff into many microservices. AWS Fargate has many valuable services. It does the job with minimal trouble. It's very observable. You can see what's going on and you have logs. You have everything. You can troubleshoot it. It's affordable and it's flexible. I would rate AWS Fargate a ten.
What's suitable for potential users depends on their company's IT capability. For a small company, it's best to engage a consultant service for help. For example, we could consult others on the solution in my previous outsourcing company. It wouldn't have been a very good one if we did it ourselves. My current company is very big, and we have the know-how here, and it's easier for us to make the decision. On a scale from one to ten, I would give AWS Fargate an eight.
What are compute services? Compute services are also known as Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS). This is a web service that provides secure, resizable compute capacity in the cloud, and it’s designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers. Compute platforms supply a virtual server instance while providing storage and APIs that allow users to migrate workloads to virtual machines. Users are allocated compute power and can choose to start, stop, access, or configure their...
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate it around eight. I would recommend using the product based on the specific workloads they are dealing with. For instance, if they have strict sub-second performance requirements, I might not suggest it. The decision depends on their specific requirements, and I would advise accordingly.
In terms of process documentation and speed, it really depends on what how many CPUs and memory you put in and whether you get adequate speed. For me, it's more than enough. All those functions are primitive functions. They mostly don't need big CPUs and stuff. You just break stuff into many microservices. AWS Fargate has many valuable services. It does the job with minimal trouble. It's very observable. You can see what's going on and you have logs. You have everything. You can troubleshoot it. It's affordable and it's flexible. I would rate AWS Fargate a ten.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
I rate AWS Fargate an eight out of ten.
What's suitable for potential users depends on their company's IT capability. For a small company, it's best to engage a consultant service for help. For example, we could consult others on the solution in my previous outsourcing company. It wouldn't have been a very good one if we did it ourselves. My current company is very big, and we have the know-how here, and it's easier for us to make the decision. On a scale from one to ten, I would give AWS Fargate an eight.
Everything in this solution works like a charm. I'd rate it as ten out of ten.