Amazon EC2 vs Apache NiFi comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Apache are both solutions in the Compute Service category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.1, while Apache is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 5.4% mindshare in CS, compared to Apache’s 8.5% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Apache users who would recommend it.

Amazon EC2

Read 67 Amazon EC2 reviews

966 Views
502 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Apache NiFi

Read 13 Apache NiFi reviews

1,553 Views
531 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon EC2

Apache NiFi

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Apache NiFi and Amazon EC2 operate in data integration and cloud computing. Amazon EC2's extensive infrastructure gives it an advantage in scalability and performance.

Features: Apache NiFi offers an intuitive interface for visual data flow management, seamless data provenance, and robust security controls. Amazon EC2 provides high computing capacity, flexible storage, and comprehensive networking, with extensive cloud services suitable for dynamic computing needs.

Room for Improvement: Apache NiFi could enhance direct customer support options and expand scalability features. Improving its learning resources and community support would be beneficial. Enhancing its integration capabilities with a broader range of external tools could also be advantageous. Amazon EC2 could work on simplifying cost management tools to avoid unforeseen expenses. Enhancing the user interface for non-technical users and expanding documentation for better usability would be helpful. Improving the clarity of instance types and pricing plans for user awareness could be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache NiFi features a straightforward deployment process with its user-friendly configuration and robust data flow management, yet customer support is primarily community-driven. Amazon EC2 excels with extensive deployment options and strong infrastructure support, offering a wide range of support plans that ensure reliable performance and scalability.

Pricing and ROI: Apache NiFi, as an open-source tool, incurs lower initial setup costs, making it cost-effective for smaller enterprises, and provides significant ROI through improved data handling. Amazon EC2 uses a flexible, usage-based pricing model allowing for scaling of resources, which can lead to a higher ROI depending on utilization and management.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon EC2 vs. Apache NiFi Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EC2 vs. Apache NiFi

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EC2

Ranking in Compute Service

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Apache NiFi

Ranking in Compute Service

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Amazon EC2 is 5.4%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Apache NiFi is 8.5%, up from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compute Service

Featured Reviews

KatlegoMabila

Senior AWS Account Manager at Silicon Overdrive

Offers customization and flexibility with great support

Scalability depends on whether the client wants to scale up or scale down. It decreases resources based on demand. The great aspect of scalability is the flexibility to allow business success to optimize resource solutions and cost efficiency. Another crucial aspect of scalability is auto-scaling. When you have the opportunity to auto-scale, it can't always be available for everything. If you have chosen to integrate with auto-scaling, it's marvellous and doesn't require additional effort. Auto-scaling gives you the edge by using the capacity you have efficiently, scaling up or down as needed. These flexibilities within the EC2 feature instances of AWS play a crucial role in helping me utilize AWS EC2 Intelligent efficiently.

Read full review

Bharghava Raghavendra Beesa

Senior Developer at Infosys

The tool enables effective data transformation and integration

There are some areas for improvement, particularly with record-level tasks that take a bit of time. The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversions without a specific process. Enhancing features related to alerting would be helpful, including mobile alerts for pipeline issues. Integration with mobile devices for error alerts would simplify information delivery.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would recommend this solution to others who want to start using it."

"Its ease of use is valuable."

"I like EC2 because of its simple workload and the ability to configure VPCs and security groups."

"I like the AMI-related features. A very good feature of this solution is the customizable AMI. It is a very good feature provided by Amazon. The encryption technologies are also very good. We are using KMS, etc."

"Amazon EC2 allows us to create different regions and availability zones based upon application needs."

"The ability to bring up servers and then do the computation and deposit means we don't have to maintain a data center. Everything is virtual and the security is also taken care of. It helps us to achieve compliance. Being a small startup with the security features that AWS provides helps us with compliance."

"What we have found most valuable is that we have not lost stability in the program."

"What I found most valuable in Amazon EC2 is that you only pay for what you use, versus an on-premise deployment that requires you to pay for the cost of the server. When it's on-premise, you'll need to meet more specifications and requirements, and the purchasing process even takes time. As Amazon EC2 is cloud-based, you'll only pay when you use the service."

More Amazon EC2 pros

"The initial setup is very easy."

"Apache NiFi is user-friendly. Its most valuable features for handling large volumes of data include its multitude of integrated endpoints and clients and the ability to create cron jobs to run tasks at regular intervals."

"Visually, this is a good product."

"The most valuable feature has been the range of clients and the range of connectors that we could use."

"The user interface is good and makes it easy to design very popular workflows."

"The most valuable features of this solution are ease of use and implementation."

"We can integrate the tool with other applications easily."

"It's an automated flow, where you can build a flow from source to destination, then do the transformation in between."

More Apache NiFi pros

Cons

"We're expecting to have Graviton instances. Graviton means it's not internal, it's a low-cost instance. At present time, Graviton is not supported for a few packages."

"The GUI used to deploy EC2 must be improved."

"Amazon EC2 could improve the stability."

"The ease of migrating applications could be improved."

"The only issue with EC2 is that it makes it difficult to install an LLS certificate on your WordPress website that you have deployed inside that virtual machine. That becomes complicated."

"Amazon EC2's pricing could be better."

"The availability and response time of the free technical support can be improved."

"I would like to see improvement in the information available up-front for users around tailoring the package to their actual requirements. At present it can take time to work with the on demand instance until you are used to what features are right for the user."

More Amazon EC2 cons

"The quality of JSON data processing could be improved, as JSON workloads require manual conversions without a specific process."

"The tool should incorporate more tutorials for advanced use cases. It has tutorials for simple use cases."

"There should be a better way to integrate a development environment with local tools."

"There is room for improvement in integration with SSO. For example, NiFi does not have any integration with SSO. And if I want to give some kind of rollback access control across the organization. That is not possible."

"More features must be added to the product."

"I think the UI interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"The use case templates could be more precise to typical business needs."

"The overall stability of this solution could be improved. In a future release, we would like to have access to more features that could be used in a parallel way. This would provide more freedom with processing."

More Apache NiFi cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's expensive, and it could be cheaper."

"It's competitive but can vary based on instance types and usage patterns."

"It has helped to reduce costs with infrastructure."

"Pricing appears to be cheap, however, it is extremely difficult in calculating what something will cost."

"For our usage, the cost is approximately $20,000 to $23,000 per month."

"The price of Amazon EC2 could improve. The Google Cloud Platform is more cost-effective."

"Amazon EC2 is a very expensive solution."

"Reducing the price of the solution could lead to an improvement."

More Amazon EC2 pricing and cost advice

"I used the tool's free version."

"It's an open-source solution."

"The solution is open-source."

"We use the free version of Apache NiFi."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon EC2?

The scalability and elasticity are helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EC2?

Amazon EC2 is a bit expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon EC2?

The main thing that needs improvement is the cost. Other than that, there is nothing that needs improvement.

See all answers

What do you like most about Apache NiFi?

The initial setup is very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache NiFi?

Apache NiFi is open-source and free. Its integration with systems like Cloudera can be expensive, but Apache NiFi itself presents the best pricing as a standalone tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache NiFi?

The logging system of Apache NiFi needs improvement. It is difficult to debug compared to Airflow ( /products/apache-airflow-reviews ), where task details and issues are clear. With Apache NiFi, I ...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Batch vs Amazon EC2

Compared 27% of the time

AWS Fargate vs Amazon EC2

Compared 19% of the time

AWS Lambda vs Amazon EC2

Compared 18% of the time

Google Compute Engine vs Amazon EC2

Compared 14% of the time

Google App Engine vs Amazon EC2

Compared 11% of the time

More Amazon EC2 Competitors

AWS Lambda vs Apache NiFi

Compared 29% of the time

Google Cloud Dataflow vs Apache NiFi

Compared 26% of the time

Apache Spark vs Apache NiFi

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Fargate vs Apache NiFi

Compared 9% of the time

Azure Stream Analytics vs Apache NiFi

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache NiFi Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EC2

June 2025

Download Amazon EC2 product report

Buyer's Guide

Apache NiFi

June 2025

Download Apache NiFi product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, EC2

No data available

Overview

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is a web service that provides secure, resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale cloud computing easier for developers.

Amazon EC2’s simple web service interface allows you to obtain and configure capacity with minimal friction. It provides you with complete control of your computing resources and lets you run on Amazon’s proven computing environment. Amazon EC2 reduces the time required to obtain and boot new server instances to minutes, allowing you to quickly scale capacity, both up and down, as your computing requirements change. Amazon EC2 changes the economics of computing by allowing you to pay only for capacity that you actually use. Amazon EC2 provides developers the tools to build failure resilient applications and isolate them from common failure scenarios.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Apache NiFi is an easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Apache

Sample Customers

Netflix, Expedia, TimeInc., Novaris, airbnb, Lamborghini

Macquarie Telecom Group, Dovestech, Slovak Telekom, Looker, Hastings Group

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EC2 vs. Apache NiFi

June 2025

Free Report: Amazon EC2 vs. Apache NiFi

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EC2 vs. Apache NiFi and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon EC2 vs. Apache NiFi report.

See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.