Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025
AWS Fargate and Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling both compete in the domain of cloud computing, focusing on scalable and efficient application deployment. AWS Fargate has the upper hand due to its ease of deployment and automatic scaling capabilities, whereas Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling excels in cost efficiency and seamless integration with AWS services.
Features: AWS Fargate provides easy container management without server management, offers automatic scaling and integrates well with AWS services for variable workloads. It simplifies deployment, speeding up time-to-market. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling offers versatile scaling options based on demand, with high availability through effective instance management and cost efficiency during peak traffic.
Room for Improvement: AWS Fargate needs improved cost predictability, lower configuration complexity, and better documentation for monitoring scaling configurations. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling could enhance its pricing strategy, ease of use, and configuration flexibility while improving access to console logs and better documentation to prevent unexpected costs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Fargate is user-friendly, especially for public cloud deployment, with generally strong support although technical interactions can vary. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is effective for both public and hybrid cloud environments, with positive customer service but room for improvement in technical communication.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Fargate pricing is higher, particularly for startups, but is justified by its pay-as-you-go model and excellent ROI for agile operations. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling is competitively priced but can become expensive if not managed well. It offers flexibility through usage-based pricing but requires careful management to optimize ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed
AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling Report (Updated: July 2025).
