AWS Fargate vs Amazon EC2 comparison

Amazon EC2 and AWS Fargate are both solutions in the Compute Service category. Amazon EC2 is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8, while AWS Fargate is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5. Amazon EC2 holds a 5.4% mindshare in CS, compared to AWS Fargate’s 14.4% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon EC2 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AWS Fargate users who would recommend it.

Amazon EC2

Read 65 Amazon EC2 reviews

1,179 Views
773 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

AWS Fargate

Read 17 AWS Fargate reviews

3,381 Views
1,929 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon EC2

AWS Fargate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Amazon EC2 and AWS Fargate compete in the cloud infrastructure space, providing scalable and flexible solutions. AWS Fargate seems to have an advantage in ease of use due to its serverless architecture, requiring less management intervention compared to EC2.

Features: Amazon EC2 offers quick instance provisioning, variety in instance types, and seamless integration capabilities. It supports both Windows and Linux systems and allows custom configurations. AWS Fargate delivers simplicity with its serverless architecture, focusing on container deployment and management without the need for EC2 instances. Its integration with other AWS services enhances its capability to scale applications automatically.

Room for Improvement: Amazon EC2 could simplify customization and reduce instance startup time. Better pricing clarity and network configuration would enhance its offering. AWS Fargate needs easier setup processes and improved monitoring features. Its cost management and application scaling integrations could also use refinement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon EC2 is adaptable, supporting public, private, and hybrid cloud deployments. While it offers excellent technical support, integration support is sometimes lacking. AWS Fargate simplifies public cloud application deployments without infrastructure management. Its customer service is commendable, especially noted for prompt email assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon EC2's multifaceted pricing includes pay-as-you-go and reserved instances, but it may become expensive if not efficiently managed. AWS Fargate operates on a pay-as-you-go basis. While potentially costlier for smaller applications, it offers savings in infrastructure management, making it valuable for enterprises seeking simplified management.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2 Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EC2

Ranking in Compute Service

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AWS Fargate

Ranking in Compute Service

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Amazon EC2 is 5.4%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Fargate is 14.4%, down from 18.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compute Service

Featured Reviews

KatlegoMabila

Senior AWS Account Manager at Silicon Overdrive

Offers customization and flexibility with great support

Scalability depends on whether the client wants to scale up or scale down. It decreases resources based on demand. The great aspect of scalability is the flexibility to allow business success to optimize resource solutions and cost efficiency. Another crucial aspect of scalability is auto-scaling. When you have the opportunity to auto-scale, it can't always be available for everything. If you have chosen to integrate with auto-scaling, it's marvellous and doesn't require additional effort. Auto-scaling gives you the edge by using the capacity you have efficiently, scaling up or down as needed. These flexibilities within the EC2 feature instances of AWS play a crucial role in helping me utilize AWS EC2 Intelligent efficiently.

Read full review

Subrata Mukherjee

Senior Technical Architect; Head of Platform at Blenheim Chalcot IT Services India

Boost demand response with cost-efficient serverless architecture

We are a venture builder company, and if we select AWS for our product. Our design is based on a serverless architecture model. ECS Fargate is the most convenient way in terms of scalability, integration, and cost control Thanks to the serverless model and easy integration features, a few…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I found most valuable in Amazon EC2 is that you only pay for what you use, versus an on-premise deployment that requires you to pay for the cost of the server. When it's on-premise, you'll need to meet more specifications and requirements, and the purchasing process even takes time. As Amazon EC2 is cloud-based, you'll only pay when you use the service."

"The scalability of Amazon EC2 is good. However, the stability can depend on what service I am using."

"Configuration can be changed at any time and it's very scalable."

"The setup is straightforward and it takes around an hour."

"Amazon EC2 has plenty of scalability options to decrease or increase the number we need. Based on our bandwidth usage we may go for a higher or downgrade level. We can do it ourselves."

"We find it easy to scale."

"EC2 is flexible when we need to increase its resources (memory, boosting, and storage) based on our usage. That is the power of EC2."

"The most important aspects are that the solution is scalable and easy to manage."

More Amazon EC2 pros

"If you create your deployment with a good set of rules for how to scale in, you can just set it and forget it."

"I like their containerization service. You can use Docker or something similar and deploy quickly without the know-how related to, for example, Kubernetes. If you use AKS or Kubernetes, then you have to have the know-how. But for Fargate, you don't need to have the know-how there. You just deploy the container or the image, and then you have the container, and you can use it as AWS takes care of the rest. This makes it easier for those getting started or if you don't have a strong DevOps team inside your organization."

"We appreciate the simple use of containers within this solution, it makes managing the containers quick and easy."

"AWS Fargate automatically scales to meet demand, making it ideal for applications with variable workloads."

"AWS Fargate is an easy-to-use tool to simplify setup. You only pay for the resources you use. If you need to quickly create, delete, or scale applications without managing resources like EC2 instances, Fargate is the best service to use."

"AWS Fargate has many valuable services. It does the job with minimal trouble. It's very observable. You can see what's going on and you have logs. You have everything. You can troubleshoot it. It's affordable and it's flexible."

"Fargate's integration with other AWS services is really good."

"The most valuable feature of AWS Fargate is its ability to run on demand without the constant run time of basic resources."

More AWS Fargate pros

Cons

"The IP changes whenever we restart which is frustrating."

"The product needs to improve its cost management."

"One of the things that need to be looked into is the complex pricing, which is rather intense."

"The availability and response time of the free technical support can be improved."

"My impression is that the scalability of this product could be improved. My opinion is that, for example, the Lambda solution is much more scalable than EC2."

"Regional acceleration could improve. If I am hosting a website and I want the experience to be faster they should have this feature to allow for increased speeds."

"Regarding availability, a noticeable improvement would be the possibility of more load balancing configurations and the deployment of more datacenters, mainly in Latin America."

"The process of detaching EC2 instances to avoid billing could be less complex."

More Amazon EC2 cons

"As I have not worked with Fargate extensively, I do not have any specific improvements."

"I would like to see the older dashboard instead of the newer version. I don't like the new dashboard."

"There are features that could be added or enhanced."

"There is a tool named Compose that helps in converting the Docker Compose file into a Kubernetes file. For ECS and Fargate, AWS reads a Dockerfile and helps with conversion. However, I am uncertain if it's ready for deployment after conversion."

"AWS Fargate could improve the privileged mode containers. We had some problems and they were not able to run."

"We faced challenges in vertically scaling our workload."

"If there are any options to manage containers, that would be good. That relates more to the cost point. For example, over the next three months, I'll be making a comparison between solutions like CAST AI and other software-as-a-service platforms that offer Kubernetes management with an emphasis on cost reduction."

"Challenges include higher costs for smaller clients, limited control over underlying infrastructure customization, and potential latencies during task startup."

More AWS Fargate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable, but there is definitely an opportunity to lower it in instances which are of a higher configuration, because they have been typically used for the long term."

"There is a license required to use this solution and we pay on a monthly basis."

"The pricing of this solution is variable. There is an open-source variant that is accessible via the public cloud, and then tiers that range in price depending on the level and amount of usage that is required."

"It's competitive but can vary based on instance types and usage patterns."

"The license fee for Amazon EC2 is higher than its competitors."

"The clients have found the billing of Amazon EC2 good, but the price could be less high. There is a monthly subscription to use the solution."

"The price of Amazon EC2 could improve. The Google Cloud Platform is more cost-effective."

"I use the free tier, although I have paid for some services that are not free. The overall cost of this solution depends on the services you use."

More Amazon EC2 pricing and cost advice

"I rate the price of AWS Fargate a four out of five."

"We would advise that this solution has a slightly-higher price point than others on the market. There is a free plan available for start-ups, but the free and lower range licensing models do not provide the full functionality."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon EC2?

The scalability and elasticity are helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EC2?

I'm going to mention again that there is quite a bit of complexity within the pricing of EC2 instances. I'm just going to give it six out of ten since there are various standards, upfront and commi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon EC2?

There is not much to be improved or enhanced. One of the things that need to be looked into is the complex pricing, which is rather intense. Sometimes, clients don't understand the structures. Thes...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Fargate?

The most valuable feature of Fargate is that it's self-managed. You don't have to configure your own clusters or deploy any Kubernetes clusters. This simplifies the initial deployment and scaling p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Fargate?

The monitoring capabilities of AWS Fargate could be improved and made more robust. The error handling aspect sometimes causes issues and can get stuck during deployment, making the process not very...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering AWS Fargate?

I would recommend AWS Fargate as an alternative to AWS Lambda for running loads or hosting a service. It is a good service for keeping instances running, which minimizes initial latency. Overall, I...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Batch vs Amazon EC2

Compared 24% of the time

AWS Lambda vs Amazon EC2

Compared 17% of the time

Google Compute Engine vs Amazon EC2

Compared 12% of the time

Google App Engine vs Amazon EC2

Compared 9% of the time

Apache Spark vs Amazon EC2

Compared 9% of the time

More Amazon EC2 Competitors

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling vs AWS Fargate

Compared 41% of the time

Heroku vs AWS Fargate

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle Compute Cloud Service vs AWS Fargate

Compared 9% of the time

Apache NiFi vs AWS Fargate

Compared 8% of the time

AWS Batch vs AWS Fargate

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Fargate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EC2

April 2025

Download Amazon EC2 product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Fargate

April 2025

Download AWS Fargate product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, EC2

No data available

Overview

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is a web service that provides secure, resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale cloud computing easier for developers.

Amazon EC2’s simple web service interface allows you to obtain and configure capacity with minimal friction. It provides you with complete control of your computing resources and lets you run on Amazon’s proven computing environment. Amazon EC2 reduces the time required to obtain and boot new server instances to minutes, allowing you to quickly scale capacity, both up and down, as your computing requirements change. Amazon EC2 changes the economics of computing by allowing you to pay only for capacity that you actually use. Amazon EC2 provides developers the tools to build failure resilient applications and isolate them from common failure scenarios.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

A new compute engine that enables you to use containers as a fundamental compute primitive without having to manage the underlying instances. With Fargate, you don’t need to provision, configure, or scale virtual machines in your clusters to run containers. Fargate can be used with Amazon ECS today, with plans to support Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) in the future.

Fargate has flexible configuration options so you can closely match your application needs and granular, per-second billing.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

Netflix, Expedia, TimeInc., Novaris, airbnb, Lamborghini

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Buyer's Guide

AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2

April 2025

Free Report: AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2 and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2 report.

See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.