No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Fargate vs Amazon EC2 comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
Amazon EC2 delivers cost savings and efficiency, enhancing innovation and agility despite higher costs than on-premise solutions.
Sentiment score
7.0
AWS Fargate enhances organizational efficiency and customer experience with cost-effective, scalable, serverless solutions, increasing operational capacity and reducing processing costs.
This cost factor has an impact on the project, giving us more possibilities to configure other services and greater financial freedom.
Data Engineer I at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
I would say I have saved more than a week with Amazon EC2 compared to my previous on-premises setup.
Architect at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The pay-as-you-go pricing model of AWS Fargate was one of the major drivers for us to move there because we reduced costs while increasing the quality of the processing services by about 30%.
Head of Infrastructure at Teamcore
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
Amazon EC2 support is generally effective, though premium support excels, with some challenges in technical integration and communication.
Sentiment score
6.8
AWS Fargate offers highly rated support and documentation, with proactive engagement enhancing user experience for all customers.
I would rate technical support from Amazon a 10, as we have on-prem AWS experts.
Consultant at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Amazon's customer support is much better than other clouds.
Data Engineer I at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the AWS support team a seven.
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Principal Global Services
Even though we didn't contract support, every two weeks I had a 30-minute meeting with a cloud architect from AWS to help our team use different products of AWS, especially with SageMaker for a forecasting algorithm we were developing.
Head of Infrastructure at Teamcore
For pro support, AWS charges additional fees.
Network and system administrator at AyanWorks
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Amazon EC2 is highly praised for its scalability and autoscaling features, contributing to cost efficiency and reliability.
Sentiment score
8.4
AWS Fargate efficiently handles demand fluctuations with dynamic scaling, maintaining high user satisfaction and scalability for containerized environments.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Amazon EC2 is highly stable, with minimal downtime and issues usually caused by specific use cases or misconfigurations.
Sentiment score
8.2
AWS Fargate offers high stability and reliability, ideal for low-traffic applications, but may not suit large-scale traffic.
Amazon EC2 is stable and more economical.
Data Engineer I at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
It is somewhat more reliable compared to Azure.
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Principal Global Services
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon EC2 users seek cost reduction, improved documentation, better UI, seamless integrations, scalability, and more user-friendly tools.
AWS Fargate needs cost efficiency, easier setup, improved documentation, better monitoring, scaling, and UI enhancements for user-friendliness.
I have heard from multiple people that if you have an Amazon EC2 instance running and you stop it, the billing continues unless you terminate the Amazon EC2 instance.
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
There was not proper documentation on how to install the patch managers and automate patching with System Managers.
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Principal Global Services
I think improvements can be made to Amazon EC2 by increasing the memory, offering more instance types, and including GPUs as mentioned in the keynote.
Architect at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
For a company that does not require complexity or managing Kubernetes clusters, AWS Fargate is a great way to go.
Head of Infrastructure at Teamcore
AWS Fargate is pretty straightforward for simple tasks and it should remain this way; an additional feature would make it complex and possibly not so stable.
Senior Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at Globant
They need to improve some UI-based interaction.
Network and system administrator at AyanWorks
 

Setup Cost

Amazon EC2 offers flexible, scalable pricing with potential savings, though cost management requires strategic planning to address complexities.
AWS Fargate offers flexible consumption-based pricing, valuable for enterprises, though costlier than alternatives, with discounts improving affordability.
I found it very cheap and a fair price according to what we need.
Data Engineer I at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
The licensing fees for Amazon EC2 are affordable, especially for lower tiers where there are fewer requirements or where the load is very low for product development.
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Principal Global Services
 

Valuable Features

Amazon EC2 provides scalable, flexible, cost-effective cloud resources with seamless AWS integration, security, and tools like Docker and Kubernetes.
AWS Fargate offers serverless, auto-scaling container deployment, boosting productivity and cost-efficiency by removing infrastructure management concerns.
The main benefits Amazon EC2 provides for me as an end user are cost savings, as they are more OpEx costs rather than CapEx for us.
Consultant at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
With the cloud, deployment is easy, and within a minute, we can deploy the server and give it to the developers so they can work on it right away after deployment.
Architect at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Amazon EC2 offers flexibility.
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
It's very fast in terms of scaling my containers; it's much faster than other solutions.
Senior Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at Globant
What I find best about AWS Fargate is that compared to deploying containers on EC2, where we need to check everything manually such as uptime, error logs, and other issues, AWS Fargate manages all these aspects automatically.
Network and system administrator at AyanWorks
One of the best features of AWS Fargate is that it was useful for us because we didn't require to run container workloads and we didn't need to deal with the management of a Kubernetes cluster directly, and the ability to run those workloads just in a scheduled manner is also a great feature.
Head of Infrastructure at Teamcore
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EC2
Ranking in Compute Service
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
74
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
AWS Fargate
Ranking in Compute Service
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Amazon EC2 is 14.9%, up from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Fargate is 9.5%, down from 12.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Compute Service Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Amazon EC214.9%
AWS Fargate9.5%
Other75.6%
Compute Service
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2879559 - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Engineer I at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Flexible virtual machines have accelerated data experimentation and reduced project costs
The best features that Amazon EC2 offers are the availability and the freedom to work with whatever I want. I can configure simpler machines to conduct quicker tests, or I can configure more robust machines according to what the project needs, including machines with a visual operating system. Regarding this flexibility, it impacts my day-to-day work and the projects I develop in terms of speed. If I want to test a project that has JavaScript with Angular and Node.js and I need to install MongoDB, I can configure a machine quickly, tailored for that, and get the data via API from somewhere. If I had to do this on my company machine, I would have to open a ticket with IT and explain the project. Something I could do in one day through my own processes would take two weeks through the company's procedures. Amazon EC2 has had a positive impact on my organization because its configuration offers more options than other clouds. Especially in the IoT area, we prefer to use AWS rather than Microsoft because of the robustness and security, whether in a gateway that we configure, in a firewall, or elsewhere. We adapted better to Amazon EC2.
Deepak Nemade - PeerSpot reviewer
Network and system administrator at AyanWorks
Has reduced manual container monitoring and restarted services automatically while UI interactions still need attention
What I find best about AWS Fargate is that compared to deploying containers on EC2, where we need to check everything manually such as uptime, error logs, and other issues, AWS Fargate manages all these aspects automatically. If a container goes down, it automatically restarts it, and according to our requirements, it handles scaling up and down of all containers. This feature is really amazing.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
12%
Marketing Services Firm
10%
Construction Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
16%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business31
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise30
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EC2?
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing was fine. I found it very cheap and a fair price according to what we need.
What needs improvement with Amazon EC2?
I cannot think of a way for Amazon EC2 to be improved.
What is your primary use case for Amazon EC2?
I have been working as a data engineer for four years now. In my first year, I worked at a logistics company where I focused exclusively on data. At Energisa, I work in the innovation area, where I...
What needs improvement with AWS Fargate?
They need to improve some UI-based interaction.
What advice do you have for others considering AWS Fargate?
Using AWS Fargate is becoming easier as the platform improves. On a scale of 1-10, I rate AWS Fargate a 7.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Fargate?
The pricing is dependent on the load being run. AWS Fargate follows a pay-as-you-go model, which provides flexibility. The pricing details can be easily found on the AWS Fargate website.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, EC2
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Netflix, Expedia, TimeInc., Novaris, airbnb, Lamborghini
Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2 and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.