AWS Fargate vs Amazon EC2 comparison

Amazon EC2 and AWS Fargate are both solutions in the Compute Service category. Amazon EC2 is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.1, while AWS Fargate is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5. Amazon EC2 holds a 5.4% mindshare in CS, compared to AWS Fargate’s 14.0% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon EC2 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AWS Fargate users who would recommend it.

Amazon EC2

Read 67 Amazon EC2 reviews

966 Views
502 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

AWS Fargate

Read 18 AWS Fargate reviews

2,568 Views
1,414 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon EC2

AWS Fargate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Amazon EC2 and AWS Fargate compete in the cloud infrastructure space, providing scalable and flexible solutions. AWS Fargate seems to have an advantage in ease of use due to its serverless architecture, requiring less management intervention compared to EC2.

Features: Amazon EC2 offers quick instance provisioning, variety in instance types, and seamless integration capabilities. It supports both Windows and Linux systems and allows custom configurations. AWS Fargate delivers simplicity with its serverless architecture, focusing on container deployment and management without the need for EC2 instances. Its integration with other AWS services enhances its capability to scale applications automatically.

Room for Improvement: Amazon EC2 could simplify customization and reduce instance startup time. Better pricing clarity and network configuration would enhance its offering. AWS Fargate needs easier setup processes and improved monitoring features. Its cost management and application scaling integrations could also use refinement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon EC2 is adaptable, supporting public, private, and hybrid cloud deployments. While it offers excellent technical support, integration support is sometimes lacking. AWS Fargate simplifies public cloud application deployments without infrastructure management. Its customer service is commendable, especially noted for prompt email assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon EC2's multifaceted pricing includes pay-as-you-go and reserved instances, but it may become expensive if not efficiently managed. AWS Fargate operates on a pay-as-you-go basis. While potentially costlier for smaller applications, it offers savings in infrastructure management, making it valuable for enterprises seeking simplified management.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2 Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EC2

Ranking in Compute Service

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AWS Fargate

Ranking in Compute Service

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Compute Service category, the mindshare of Amazon EC2 is 5.4%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Fargate is 14.0%, down from 18.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compute Service

Featured Reviews

KatlegoMabila

Senior AWS Account Manager at Silicon Overdrive

Offers customization and flexibility with great support

Scalability depends on whether the client wants to scale up or scale down. It decreases resources based on demand. The great aspect of scalability is the flexibility to allow business success to optimize resource solutions and cost efficiency. Another crucial aspect of scalability is auto-scaling. When you have the opportunity to auto-scale, it can't always be available for everything. If you have chosen to integrate with auto-scaling, it's marvellous and doesn't require additional effort. Auto-scaling gives you the edge by using the capacity you have efficiently, scaling up or down as needed. These flexibilities within the EC2 feature instances of AWS play a crucial role in helping me utilize AWS EC2 Intelligent efficiently.

Read full review

Subrata Mukherjee

Senior Technical Architect; Head of Platform at Blenheim Chalcot IT Services India

Boost demand response with cost-efficient serverless architecture

We are a venture builder company, and if we select AWS for our product. Our design is based on a serverless architecture model. ECS Fargate is the most convenient way in terms of scalability, integration, and cost control Thanks to the serverless model and easy integration features, a few…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"EC2 has the typical advantages of using the cloud. It's easy to provision and set up."

"There's a lot of encryption across the setups to ensure that database credentials and everything related to security are well managed."

"The best features of Amazon EC2 are its high performance and security."

"The most valuable features of Amazon EC2 are content delivery and adaptability."

"Amazon EC2 is really reliable and provides great flexibility."

"The greatest benefit of Amazon EC2 is its versatility, including the diverse range of servers available and the ability to connect to various resources."

"Amazon EC2's flexibility and ease of configuration were found to be very valuable."

"The amount of bandwidth has been most valuable."

More Amazon EC2 pros

"By using a server's compute resources, one can observe the resource metrics. With AWS, one can determine when servers will be used based on CloudWatch results. For example, CloudWatch informs the application and service platform when the hit ratio has reached the threshold value."

"We appreciate the simple use of containers within this solution, it makes managing the containers quick and easy."

"AWS Fargate has definitely impacted our organization positively because before that, we couldn't accommodate the workload requirements as flexibly as we can with Fargate."

"AWS Fargate is an easy-to-use tool to simplify setup. You only pay for the resources you use. If you need to quickly create, delete, or scale applications without managing resources like EC2 instances, Fargate is the best service to use."

"I like their containerization service. You can use Docker or something similar and deploy quickly without the know-how related to, for example, Kubernetes. If you use AKS or Kubernetes, then you have to have the know-how. But for Fargate, you don't need to have the know-how there. You just deploy the container or the image, and then you have the container, and you can use it as AWS takes care of the rest. This makes it easier for those getting started or if you don't have a strong DevOps team inside your organization."

"AWS Fargate automatically scales to meet demand, making it ideal for applications with variable workloads."

"The most valuable feature of AWS Fargate is its ability to run on demand without the constant run time of basic resources."

"If you create your deployment with a good set of rules for how to scale in, you can just set it and forget it."

More AWS Fargate pros

Cons

"Built-in and/or integration with other services to proactively identify potential failures before they occur."

"The monitoring part could be improved. When we're building and configuring things or doing database replication, EC2's monitoring could provide more information. It's hard to find the information I need in the graphs they provide."

"The process of detaching EC2 instances to avoid billing could be less complex."

"We have had some downtime using the solution."

"They can build automatic features for ENSS or network drive. They have the Control-M feature. Similarly, they should have a feature for the network drive that can be mapped. I have not seen such a feature. They have a lot of products but those are quite costly. There is no cheaper option available for the EC2 instance for syncing two drives. If these features are available, it would be good."

"Regarding availability, a noticeable improvement would be the possibility of more load balancing configurations and the deployment of more datacenters, mainly in Latin America."

"I would like to see improvement in the information available up-front for users around tailoring the package to their actual requirements. At present it can take time to work with the on demand instance until you are used to what features are right for the user."

"Technical itself could be a bit more helpful, especially when it comes to integration assistance. When we talk to the technical team, often it's some issue with integration and they'll tell us to talk to the other company. Often, the other company will look at everything and not see an issue from their end and then we are at an impasse."

More Amazon EC2 cons

"The main area for improvement is the cost, which could be lowered to be more competitive with other major cloud providers."

"AWS Fargate could improve the privileged mode containers. We had some problems and they were not able to run."

"I would like to see the older dashboard instead of the newer version. I don't like the new dashboard."

"AWS Fargate's security features weren't the most important criteria or value we got from AWS Fargate."

"There are features that could be added or enhanced."

"As I have not worked with Fargate extensively, I do not have any specific improvements."

"We faced challenges in vertically scaling our workload."

"I heard from my team that it's not easy to predict the cost. That is the only issue we have with AWS Fargate, but I think that's acceptable. AWS Fargate isn't user-friendly. Anything related to Software as a Service or microservice architecture is not easy to implement. You're required to have DevOps from your side to implement the solution. AWS Fargate is just a temporary solution for us. When we grow to a certain level, we may use AKS for better control."

More AWS Fargate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"EC2 pricing is somewhat transparent, in that AWS provides pricing for all instance types. However, the number of pricing options can be confusing."

"The pricing of this solution is variable. There is an open-source variant that is accessible via the public cloud, and then tiers that range in price depending on the level and amount of usage that is required."

"We are paying about $1,500 a month for one of the services."

"The price of Amazon EC2 could improve. The Google Cloud Platform is more cost-effective."

"The tool's pricing is not cheap."

"It's expensive, and it could be cheaper."

"The use of Amazon EC2 does not incur any licensing fees."

"For our usage, the cost is approximately $20,000 to $23,000 per month."

More Amazon EC2 pricing and cost advice

"I rate the price of AWS Fargate a four out of five."

"We would advise that this solution has a slightly-higher price point than others on the market. There is a free plan available for start-ups, but the free and lower range licensing models do not provide the full functionality."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon EC2?

The scalability and elasticity are helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EC2?

Amazon EC2 is a bit expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon EC2?

The main thing that needs improvement is the cost. Other than that, there is nothing that needs improvement.

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS Fargate?

The most valuable feature of Fargate is that it's self-managed. You don't have to configure your own clusters or deploy any Kubernetes clusters. This simplifies the initial deployment and scaling p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Fargate?

The monitoring capabilities of AWS Fargate could be improved and made more robust. The error handling aspect sometimes causes issues and can get stuck during deployment, making the process not very...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering AWS Fargate?

I would recommend AWS Fargate as an alternative to AWS Lambda for running loads or hosting a service. It is a good service for keeping instances running, which minimizes initial latency. Overall, I...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Batch vs Amazon EC2

Compared 27% of the time

AWS Lambda vs Amazon EC2

Compared 18% of the time

Google Compute Engine vs Amazon EC2

Compared 14% of the time

Google App Engine vs Amazon EC2

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Spark vs Amazon EC2

Compared 11% of the time

More Amazon EC2 Competitors

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling vs AWS Fargate

Compared 40% of the time

Heroku vs AWS Fargate

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Compute Cloud Service vs AWS Fargate

Compared 10% of the time

Apache NiFi vs AWS Fargate

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Spark vs AWS Fargate

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS Fargate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EC2

June 2025

Download Amazon EC2 product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Fargate

June 2025

Download AWS Fargate product report

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, EC2

No data available

Overview

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is a web service that provides secure, resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale cloud computing easier for developers.

Amazon EC2’s simple web service interface allows you to obtain and configure capacity with minimal friction. It provides you with complete control of your computing resources and lets you run on Amazon’s proven computing environment. Amazon EC2 reduces the time required to obtain and boot new server instances to minutes, allowing you to quickly scale capacity, both up and down, as your computing requirements change. Amazon EC2 changes the economics of computing by allowing you to pay only for capacity that you actually use. Amazon EC2 provides developers the tools to build failure resilient applications and isolate them from common failure scenarios.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

A new compute engine that enables you to use containers as a fundamental compute primitive without having to manage the underlying instances. With Fargate, you don’t need to provision, configure, or scale virtual machines in your clusters to run containers. Fargate can be used with Amazon ECS today, with plans to support Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) in the future.

Fargate has flexible configuration options so you can closely match your application needs and granular, per-second billing.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

Netflix, Expedia, TimeInc., Novaris, airbnb, Lamborghini

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Buyer's Guide

AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2

June 2025

Free Report: AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2 and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Fargate vs. Amazon EC2 report.

See our list of best Compute Service vendors.

We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.