AWS Fargate vs Heroku comparison

"The most valuable feature of AWS Fargate is its ability to run on demand without the constant run time of basic resources."

"AWS Fargate automatically scales to meet demand, making it ideal for applications with variable workloads."

"The most valuable feature of AWS Fargate is its ease of use."

"AWS Fargate is an easy-to-use tool to simplify setup. You only pay for the resources you use. If you need to quickly create, delete, or scale applications without managing resources like EC2 instances, Fargate is the best service to use."

"We appreciate the simple use of containers within this solution, it makes managing the containers quick and easy."

"Fargate is beneficial for hosting our solutions and providing workflow management, creating legal documents, and delivering business intelligence."

"By using a server's compute resources, one can observe the resource metrics. With AWS, one can determine when servers will be used based on CloudWatch results. For example, CloudWatch informs the application and service platform when the hit ratio has reached the threshold value."

"All AWS services allow me to manage a wide range of applications and services."

"It is easy to deploy applications, and we don't need to bother about software updates on the server. We don't need to bother about machines, servers, and hardware. We only need to care about the system and functionality that we need or want to develop. They take care of everything else. It provides high availability. It is a pretty good solution that provides everything that we need. It has everything that we need to run our applications. We have many different applications, and we generate three million bills for a company in Brazil. We see more than a billion requests per day in another application. Everything works just fine, and it is very good."

"The platform is very Node.js-friendly, which is something that is important to us."

"Valuable for us was the fast deployment. This means the time to market is improved without pain for developers."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the auto maintenance of databases."

"It's easy to push a change and to deploy new things."

"What I found most valuable about this solution is that it's easy to use and integrate with GitHub actions."

"The most valuable feature of Heroku is the continuous integration and applications it provides."

"Thanks to Heroku, we don't need to do as much direct management in AWS."

"I heard from my team that it's not easy to predict the cost. That is the only issue we have with AWS Fargate, but I think that's acceptable. AWS Fargate isn't user-friendly. Anything related to Software as a Service or microservice architecture is not easy to implement. You're required to have DevOps from your side to implement the solution. AWS Fargate is just a temporary solution for us. When we grow to a certain level, we may use AKS for better control."

"AWS Fargate could improve the privileged mode containers. We had some problems and they were not able to run."

"Sometimes, Fargate can be really hard to configure."

"There are features that could be added or enhanced."

"As I have not worked with Fargate extensively, I do not have any specific improvements."

"I would like to see enhanced faster application scaling and better integration with the elastic file system to unify storage volumes and improve the launch time of instances."

"We would like to see some improvement in the process documents that are provided with this product, particularly for auto-scaling and other configuration tools that are a bit complicated."

"The main area for improvement is the cost, which could be lowered to be more competitive with other major cloud providers."

"Their support is good, but they can improve their response time."

"We don't find the pipelines intuitive. The user experience could be better. Having to set up multiple apps, then a pipeline, seems like an overkill on the amount of work to do."

"Heroku had an authentication problem a few months ago, but they solved it."

"Heroku doesn't support Docker images on the CI infrastructure."

"The tool's configuration is complex."

"I improved the application performance by monitoring and adjusting the cleaner configuration to help set better lightweight limits on containers that run the app instances."

"I think this solution would be improved if free demos were available indefinitely."

"We have to do daily restarts of some processes, which is annoying, and the support for custom CI could be better."

"I rate the price of AWS Fargate a four out of five."

"We would advise that this solution has a slightly-higher price point than others on the market. There is a free plan available for start-ups, but the free and lower range licensing models do not provide the full functionality."

"There is a standard fee for a processing unit, they call them "dynos," and then you pay for add-ons."

"The price of Heroku could be less expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

"The tool is free."

"Its price is very good."