"Their robots have increased the rate of efficiency by two to five times in our organization. There is still a human element to code out the package running the robots. You can't just click something and have it run. However, once that has been done, you can parallelize it 10 or 100 times in a fairly straightforward manner."
"It's a pretty robust product."
"The Robotic Desktop Automation Express component allows us to do rapid development outside the normal, time-consuming processes."
"The document processing engine is good. We're extracting around 70 data points from a given document, and we have an automated extraction rate of 80 percent for those fields."
"We need to analyze documents in order to understand them. We don't need to dedicate much time to this because WorkFusion's machine learning capabilities are very good. We can easily extract information and classify these documents. The document processing engine is very important to our organization because it is the center for many use cases, as we need to control the information contained in documents."
"The cognitive features of this solution are good."
"The solution is stable, we have not had any glitches or problems."
"WorkFusion helps by speeding up processes. The process takes time. It has business costs associated because there are people waiting to take the next steps in the process. The end result of waiting, whether it is an internal or external team, is that they are delayed. Therefore, it helps us in speeding up business processes and improving employee morale, as people don't have to do repetitive work anymore."
"The initial setup is very quick."
"IBM Robotic Process Automation has greatly improved the organization by improving the speed of performance, as the speed of the robot is estimated to be 20 times faster than the human being."
"The solution is scalability."
"IBM Robotic Process Automation is very easy to use."
"I like the integration with Watson and the possibility to have an intelligent reading of all the customers' documents."
"If you have a business process, and once you have automated that process, you have a readily available workflow in place."
"The quality is great! It's very strong and has a very strong platform."
"We have executed our robots thousands of times in our enterprise environment. However, in an enterprise environment, WorkFusion has performance problems. It is slow in production."
"There could be better version control through their web platform. That is something that could be improved on. Integration from the IDE, e.g., from WorkFusion Studio directly into Control Tower, would be nice to have too."
"We had some issues in the past, but it is fairly stable now. From what I hear, it is more stable in the later versions. With version 10.1.4, there were some issues relating to load distribution. However, it is good now."
"The product needs to be "simple and easy" to use. A good example of this is the use of Python code to perform automations. It is free and the skills transfer is able to happen quickly and the operation and initiation of the completed automation is easy to execute."
"We have had some problems in the past with the Inspector tool that looks at the elements on the screen. Replacing it or improving it is needed."
"We are having some database issues, but we are addressing them."
"The user experience could be better both from an RPA perspective and from a business perspective."
"It is difficult for non-technical users to use WorkFusion. If we really want to build automation, we definitely need Java developers. Their RPA is not for non-technical people. If I look at competing products, like Automation Anywhere, UiPath, Blue Prism, or even Power Automate, a non-technical person can build basic automations and deploy them. Since non-technical people can easily build basic automations, they can be deployed in no time. With WorkFusion, there isn't a similar feature that works well. One needs to write code from scratch to build automation. That is definitely a deterrent if we really want to do quick, dirty automation. I would not rate WorkFusion very high on their no-code, low-code paradigm. In this area, I would definitely expect them to improve."
"The solution should come with language customization, which would simplify its use for our customers."
"IBM Robotic Process Automation should be more stable."
"IBM should provide specific solutions for specific problems, like templates for invoicing processes, or general templates for creating efficient processes."
"This RPA should be under the umbrella of BPM. This is what the future should be."
"Stability could be better."
"We would like a decreased need for customer support."
"The time it takes for approvals, and risk analysis could be faster."
More IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Another Monday is ranked 22nd in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 1 review while IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is ranked 9th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 6 reviews. Another Monday is rated 9.0, while IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Another Monday writes "A scalable solution which is easy to install and use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) writes "Once you have automated a business process it offers a readily available workflow ". Another Monday is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate and Kofax RPA, whereas IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is most compared with UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism and ABBYY FlexiCapture.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
