

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases Tools.
I have seen a return on investment with MySQL, as it allows us to manage with fewer employees, focusing on business logic rather than database management.
The documentation is quite good.
The official AWS technical support for Amazon RDS is helpful, providing 24/7 assistance for all business support cases with tools such as the health dashboard and AWS trusted advisor.
I would rate the support from AWS very high, maybe nine, but it also depends on what kind of support you have signed in your contract, whether the premium support or the standard support.
I would rate the documentation and online support a 10 out of 10.
We have no issues and usually receive timely responses.
Its automated scaling, both in storage and instances, is vital as it eliminates manual interventions.
The installation of Amazon RDS is quite easy and quite scalable.
Despite being a strong feature, scalability could be improved due to the lack of full functionality in autoscaling.
Meeting scalability requirements through cloud computing is an expensive affair.
MySQL's scalability is currently adequate, as we have increased operations from ten thousand to twelve thousand devices, and it is working fine for us.
Amazon RDS is very stable when deployed correctly across different zones with the right configurations.
It is a stable product overall, with very few issues.
Amazon RDS is quite stable, and the SLAs are sort of 99.98%.
We face certain integration issues, especially when we integrate the database with security solutions like IBM QRadar.
From my experience, MySQL was pretty stable.
Simplifying migration for those transitioning from on-premises to cloud environments.
Having native Change Data Capture (CDC) support would be beneficial, allowing for seamless integration with Kafka without relying on external technologies like Debezium.
Enabling performance insights to view query formats where the bottlenecks occur, identifying the fixes, slow queries, and missing indexes.
It could be more beneficial if MySQL can enhance its data masking functionality in the same way it has improved data encryption.
Oracle could improve on scalability.
The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation.
While Azure provides great services, long-term plans on AWS are 20% to 30% cheaper.
I find the pricing of Amazon RDS fair, as AWS operates on a pay-for-what-you-use model.
I rate the price for Amazon as eight on a scale from one to ten.
Oracle has different components, so if you need security, you have to procure a different license, but here everything is inbuilt and it's not costly.
Amazon RDS provides data encryption using services like KMS, crucial for securing high-sensitive data and meeting compliance requirements such as HIPAA or PCI DSS.
Database management is effective in Amazon RDS because it offers automated backups, high availability, read replicas, and support from multiple database engineers, while also providing security, monitoring and metrics, scalability.
In some cases, we are using the read replica feature, and it does improve our application performance because we do not allow any downstream system to come to the main storage or main databases and perform a query.
With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment.
The main feature we utilize in MySQL is the view, and I can say that it is the most valuable feature for our needs.
It allows programming, writing stored procedures, creating views, constraints, and triggers easily.

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 74 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 62 |
Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.
MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.
MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.
What are MySQL's key features?MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.