Amazon RDS vs Google Cloud SQL comparison

Amazon RDS

Read 46 Amazon RDS reviews

8,646 Views
7,060 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Google Cloud SQL

Read 18 Google Cloud SQL reviews

5,323 Views
4,841 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon RDS

Google Cloud SQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Amazon RDS and Google Cloud SQL based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

In summary, Amazon RDS is praised for its ease of use, scalability, high availability, and strong customer support, with users highlighting the automation features and value for money. On the other hand, Google Cloud SQL is lauded for its scalability, integration with other Google services, performance, and affordability, with users appreciating the flexible storage options and efficient customer service. Areas for improvement for Amazon RDS include better documentation and performance optimization tools, while Google Cloud SQL users suggest enhancements in scalability, monitoring tools, and pricing transparency.

Features: Amazon RDS is commended for its ease of use, scalability, high availability, and automated backups. Users appreciate its simplified database management and the ability to easily scale their instances. Google Cloud SQL is praised for its seamless integration with other services, excellent backup and restoration capabilities, and automated maintenance tools. It offers a robust solution for managing databases in the cloud.

Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Amazon RDS is reported to be minimal and hassle-free, while the setup cost for Google Cloud SQL is well-managed, ensuring a smooth and hassle-free process. Both products have straightforward and transparent licensing terms, providing clarity to users., Amazon RDS users reported a positive ROI, finding value and benefits for their business. Google Cloud SQL users shared their experiences and outcomes of utilizing the product.

Room for Improvement: Amazon RDS users have pointed out the need for better documentation, detailed error messages, improved performance optimization tools, flexible configuration options, third-party tool integration, and a simplified user interface. Google Cloud SQL users also recommended enhancements in performance optimization, scalability, availability, monitoring, management tools, transparent pricing models, documentation, and support resources.

Deployment and customer support: Based on user reviews, the duration required to establish a new tech solution varies between Amazon RDS and Google Cloud SQL. Users reported spending different amounts of time on deployment and setup with Google Cloud SQL, suggesting that these phases should be considered individually. On the other hand, with Amazon RDS, users' feedback indicates that the terms deployment and setup may refer to the same period and should not be evaluated separately., Customers have reported highly satisfactory and reliable customer service from both Amazon RDS and Google Cloud SQL. However, Amazon RDS stands out for its efficient query resolution and helpful guidance, while Google Cloud SQL excels in prompt assistance and quick response times. Additionally, users appreciate the knowledgeable and friendly nature of the support teams in both services.

The summary above is based on 38 interviews we conducted recently with Amazon RDS and Google Cloud SQL users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL Report (Updated: July 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

July 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 793,295 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Amazon RDS

Ranking in Database as a Service

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Google Cloud SQL

Ranking in Database as a Service

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Database as a Service category, the mindshare of Amazon RDS is 25.9%, down from 30.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud SQL is 19.6%, up from 19.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service

Unique Categories:

No other categories found

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

Feb 23, 2024

Provides excellent authentication, authorization, integration, data protection, and autoscaling features

The product should support new databases. RocketDB is written in C++. It is useful when we work with Kafka. The product should support more databases and not just the standard four to five databases. It will help the users to explore new avenues and not be confined to the standard ones. The tool provides automatic backup, but the recovery is slow if something goes wrong. We need to wait for some time. If a failure happens, recovery takes some time. Meanwhile, we lose business. It would be great if it happens much faster. The cross-region replication settings are very complex. We need to do careful planning.

Read full review

it_user927078

Commercial and Operations Director at SygmaTel, BlaBla Connect, KnowMe Solutions

Sep 25, 2018

The pricing, compared to other solutions, was an important factor in choosing this product.

It's all built into the web browser, so any operating system will work. It's easy to manage. They help me take care of the replication data backups and software upgrades, updates and so on. They take care of everything. I no longer need experts in database management. When I say database management, I don't mean SQL commands and which command is better or which query is better constructed. The database management in terms of memory, configuration, disc space, archiving, back-ups, replication problems, updates and so on. So, I no longer need someone or a team of people sitting around, taking care of my database infrastructure. I only have Google for that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is straightforward, and technical support is good."

"It is very easy to set up initially."

"Relational databases excel in extensive normalization, eliminating data redundancy and efficiently structuring tables which leads to a clear and efficient relationship between tables using primary keys."

"The product solved our DevOps and admin problems."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"Being able to change the size of an RDS MySQL instance is amazing."

"The solution's customer service is excellent."

"The tool is very easy to use and configure."

More Amazon RDS pros

"The implementation part of the product was easy."

"It's SQL. SQL is so easy if you know something about databases. It's easy to learn."

"It is not the cool features that I find valuable, it is the stability of Google Cloud Platform."

"The most valuable features are that it's easy to use, simple, and user-friendly."

"This is a stable solution and offers good performance."

"Ease of management and the ability to oversee the statistics of your SQL."

"The solution is easy to use. I am impressed with the tool's features and functionality."

"The product is scalable."

More Google Cloud SQL pros

Cons

"The only thing that needs improvement would be the pricing of the solution."

"As a customer of Amazon RDS, you don't have super-user privileges, and that is the only drawback where improvements are required."

"Currently, we are using Fargate. Instead of that, we are planning to use EC2 instances, but we are facing some problems, and we are unable to enable NAT gateway for Elastic Load Balancer. When we enable auto-scaling, the instance count increases, and we get IP addresses dynamically. We need to whitelist the IPs of these instances, but there is no option to whitelist those IPs in Amazon RDS. We need one static IP that we can assign to ELB so that we can whitelist this IP."

"In the next release, it would be great to have access to core parameters to improve or tweak the performance."

"The Performance Monitor they have is a little clanky, at least in regards to the UI."

"The product should support new databases."

"The product must add more older versions of the database engines."

"You can only get access from the sales support. That means if you want to buy something or renew your subscription or upgrade, all these services are easily available. Yet, if you would like to get some technical support, you have to pay for it. You have to pay for an additional subscription."

More Amazon RDS cons

"For data analysis, the AI area of the product has certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"Google Cloud SQL still needs better connectivity to outside, existing data sources."

"The product's user interface could be more user-friendly to improve the overall user experience."

"The most vulnerable problem with Google SQL is that while you can customize your access control list, it provides you with a public IP address."

"The customer support should be improved."

"I would like to see better integration with all the different tools on the platform."

"The monitoring part could be better."

"The most challenging part is dealing with legacy data from your old systems and migrating it into the new setup, but once you've completed the data migration, it becomes quite convenient to use."

More Google Cloud SQL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s pricing could be cheaper."

"Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."

"Amazon RDS could improve by reducing the price."

"if you don't know how to optimize and use your tool properly, the cost might hurt you."

"The product is expensive."

"Amazon RDS is less expensive than other solutions."

"The prices for different regions are different."

"The price could be better."

More Amazon RDS pricing and cost advice

"The solution is affordable."

"While the platform’s pricing may be higher, it aligns with industry standards, considering the quality of service and features provided."

"From a financial perspective, Google Cloud SQL is on the cheaper side."

"It is not expensive, especially considering the significant reduction in database management time."

"You need to pay extra costs for backup and replication."

"The pricing is very much an important factor as to why we use this solution."

"It's really cheap. It wouldn't be more than, I believe it's around 50 euro per month for running a cloud SQL."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Retailer

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon RDS?

The product's installation phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon RDS?

The product is expensive. If Cisco needs two servers, Amazon uses four.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon RDS?

The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required.

See all answers

What do you like most about Google Cloud SQL?

The implementation part of the product was easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud SQL?

While the platform’s pricing may be higher, it aligns with industry standards, considering the quality of service and features provided.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud SQL?

They could improve documentation and dashboard stability for efficient user experience and database management.

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB Atlas vs Amazon RDS

Compared 31% of the time

SQL Azure vs Amazon RDS

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Amazon RDS

Compared 12% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Amazon RDS

Compared 4% of the time

Yugabyte Platform vs Amazon RDS

Compared 2% of the time

More Amazon RDS Competitors

SQL Azure vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 38% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 17% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 2% of the time

Google Cloud Spanner vs Google Cloud SQL

Compared 2% of the time

More Google Cloud SQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS

July 2024

Download Amazon RDS product report

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud SQL

July 2024

Download Google Cloud SQL product report

Also Known As

RDS

No data available

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Google

Overview

Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.

Google Cloud SQL is aÂ fully-managed databaseÂ service that makes it easy to set up, maintain, manage, and administer your relational PostgreSQLÂ and MySQL databases in the cloud. GoogleÂ Cloud SQL offers high performance, scalability, and convenience. Hosted on Google Cloud Platform, Cloud SQLÂ provides a database infrastructure for applications runningÂ anywhere.

Sample Customers

Edmodo

BeDataDriven, CodeFutures, Daffodil, GenieConnect, KiSSFLOW, LiveHive, SulAm_rica, Zync

Buyer's Guide

Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

July 2024

Free Report: Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon RDS vs. Google Cloud SQL report.

See our list of best Database as a Service vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.