

SQL Server and MySQL, prominent players in the database management domain, vie for attention in organizations of all sizes. While SQL Server appears to have an advantage with its advanced features and enterprise-level support, MySQL stands out for its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness, appealing to those seeking affordability and scalability.
Features: SQL Server offers dynamic resource allocation, In-Memory OLTP, and AlwaysOn availability groups, enhancing performance and disaster recovery. Its Graphical Query Analyzer aids in building stored procedures and executing queries visually. It also supports OLAP for data warehousing. MySQL is known for its multi-threaded architecture, integration with LAMP/WAMP stacks, and extensive platform compatibility. It excels in providing a flexible, scalable environment with features like stored procedures and triggers.
Room for Improvement: SQL Server faces criticism for high licensing costs, occasional performance issues, and a need for better integration with non-Microsoft systems. Calls for improved debugging tools and machine learning features are noted. MySQL users highlight the need for enhanced InnoDB performance, advanced development tools, and better support for SQL standards like stored procedures and check constraints.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SQL Server is versatile in deployment, optimized for Windows environments. While Microsoft's support is knowledgeable, it can be slow and resource-heavy. MySQL benefits from robust community support due to its open-source nature, although formal technical backing can be limited compared to SQL Server's structured offerings. It offers flexibility in both on-premises and cloud-based setups.
Pricing and ROI: SQL Server's high costs are attributed to core-based licensing, which can be restrictive despite its robust feature set being well-suited for large enterprises. MySQL, often free, offers excellent ROI for small to medium applications where open-source solutions suffice. While enterprise support incurs additional costs, its affordability remains a key draw for cost-conscious organizations.
I have seen a return on investment with MySQL, as it allows us to manage with fewer employees, focusing on business logic rather than database management.
SQL Server is the most cost-effective with good human resource availability to manage it.
All applications need our repository to provide services for our online business or our customers, so the return is good.
With Standard edition, they have saved a ton of money and they are really happy about that.
I would rate the documentation and online support a 10 out of 10.
We have no issues and usually receive timely responses.
I give their technical support a rating of ten out of ten.
There was a time when Microsoft support provided very crisp answers, but over time, they have diluted their support to third parties, leading to a drop in support quality.
When we created support tickets, the experience was very positive.
Meeting scalability requirements through cloud computing is an expensive affair.
MySQL's scalability is currently adequate, as we have increased operations from ten thousand to twelve thousand devices, and it is working fine for us.
The server where we installed it has grown from 64 gigabytes in RAM to 256 gigabytes, demonstrating significant scalability capabilities.
Most of the time, they simply add another node in the availability group.
I can scale both horizontally and vertically without challenges.
We face certain integration issues, especially when we integrate the database with security solutions like IBM QRadar.
From my experience, MySQL was pretty stable.
There was an issue with memory-optimized tables, but it was resolved in 2025, allowing you to remove that file group, which was not possible before.
All applications supporting SQL Server in my experience work very well across various industries including telecom, finance, banking, ad, entertainment, and workforce management.
It could be more beneficial if MySQL can enhance its data masking functionality in the same way it has improved data encryption.
Oracle could improve on scalability.
The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation.
It is fine to do a first release that works, but you cannot simply abandon it in the following years without service packs and improvements.
I would appreciate using Microsoft Pro as it can integrate with Excel or, with a simple query, consume information from the database using Microsoft Excel.
When we consider the price for replication in another site, the pricing becomes prohibitive.
Oracle has different components, so if you need security, you have to procure a different license, but here everything is inbuilt and it's not costly.
Cost savings on human resources for Windows plus SQL Server versus other solutions.
With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment.
The main feature we utilize in MySQL is the view, and I can say that it is the most valuable feature for our needs.
It allows programming, writing stored procedures, creating views, constraints, and triggers easily.
Always On HADR functionality is one of the features that I use on a daily basis and one of my most used features, saving me lots of time, especially since previously I had to build a SQL cluster and Windows clusters that had many dependencies on shared infrastructure, but now with Always On, it is too stable with easy management and almost zero maintenance, which SQL Server handles itself.
I have been working with SQL Server for a long time, and it works well for me as I am using it in different applications, such as web applications, Windows applications, or the data warehouse reporting.
The best features of SQL Server are availability and stability.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| SQL Server | 12.1% |
| MySQL | 6.1% |
| Other | 81.8% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 74 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 62 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 119 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 59 |
| Large Enterprise | 115 |
MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.
MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.
What are MySQL's key features?MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.
SQL Server is a relational database management system (RDBMS) by Microsoft. The product's main purposes are to store data and retrieve it as requested by other software applications - on the same computer or on another computer across a shared network. The solution is built on top of Structured Query Language (SQL), which is a standardized programming language used for relational database management.
The product is tied to Transact-SQL (T-SQL), which is an implementation of SQL from Microsoft that adds several proprietary programming extensions to the standard language. SQL Server is built similarly to other RDBMS products, as its structure is a row-based table that connects related data elements in different tables to one another. One of its most important components is the SQL Server Database Engine, as it controls data processing, storage, and security. Beneath the Database Engine is the SQL Server Operating System, which is used for memory and I/O management, locking data to avoid unneeded upgrades, and job scheduling.
The solution has four editions with different sets of services and tools. They include:
The first two are available for free and are typically utilized by smaller companies, as they work with fewer functions and storage. The second two editions are generally used by bigger organizations and enterprises and offer more features.
The solution has several functions through which users can facilitate different data-related processes. These include:
SQL Server Services
SQL Server has a wide range of add-on services that provide additional benefits beyond database management. These services include:
SQL Server Benefits
The solution has many benefits for users. These include the following:
Reviews from Real Users
A president at a consultancy evaluates SQL Server as a veteran solution with critical log shipping feature.
Harkamal S., a user at a manufacturing company, rates SQL Server with a high mark because it is a stable, scalable, and easy-to-deploy solution that pretty much covers everything.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.