

SAP HANA and MySQL compete in the database management systems category. SAP HANA has the upper hand due to its advanced real-time processing and in-memory capabilities which provide increased performance benefits for larger enterprises.
Features: SAP HANA offers comprehensive real-time processing capabilities, in-memory computing, and robust integration features. It is strong in supplier relationship management and data compression, which helps reduce data storage needs. MySQL, on the other hand, is simple, open-source, and integrates easily with various platforms. It's ideal for different environments and cost-effective for small to medium-sized applications, though it doesn't support advanced real-time analytics like SAP HANA.
Room for Improvement: SAP HANA needs enhancements in integration capabilities, user experience, and cost-efficiency for SMEs. More flexible pricing models and language support are also needed. MySQL, on its part, faces performance challenges with InnoDB, lacks active directory integration, and could improve in high availability and advanced debugging tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both SAP HANA and MySQL are flexible for deployment in on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments. SAP HANA is praised for its robust customer service, though response times can vary. MySQL benefits from extensive community support, offering a valuable resource for users seeking open-source assistance.
Pricing and ROI: SAP HANA, though expensive, offers substantial ROI for large enterprises needing comprehensive ERP solutions with a high pricing that aligns with its value. MySQL provides a significant cost advantage being open-source, suitable for businesses seeking affordable database management with optional enterprise support that is more economical than SAP HANA.
I have seen a return on investment with MySQL, as it allows us to manage with fewer employees, focusing on business logic rather than database management.
We do not feel we're getting value for the investment due to the additional resources needed for integration and maintenance.
I have seen a return on investment with SAP HANA as it typically delivers measurable ROI, especially in finance and month-end close processes.
SAP HANA is a cost-saving solution that helps save money and serves as a time-saving solution that helps save time.
I would rate the documentation and online support a 10 out of 10.
We have no issues and usually receive timely responses.
The community support is better than the official SAP support.
While issues are resolved eventually, the first level of support is not as good as we would like.
When we raise a ticket for AWS or Azure issues, we find their support is very proactive, while SAP's support is quite passive.
Meeting scalability requirements through cloud computing is an expensive affair.
MySQL's scalability is currently adequate, as we have increased operations from ten thousand to twelve thousand devices, and it is working fine for us.
SAP HANA handles large data volumes efficiently, allowing for adding more modules or users without performance issues.
Our operations have grown from a hundred data operations a day to as many in a couple of seconds.
It depends on what needs to change in the structure, as some entities cannot be changed and require a new implementation, while others can be modified.
We face certain integration issues, especially when we integrate the database with security solutions like IBM QRadar.
From my experience, MySQL was pretty stable.
We recently faced customer data loss during the cluster handover or failover fallback.
We have not had any problems in the last seven to eight years.
Regarding stability, they are using legacy systems and have implemented SAP HANA.
It could be more beneficial if MySQL can enhance its data masking functionality in the same way it has improved data encryption.
Oracle could improve on scalability.
The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation.
The main issue is the ecosystem, which lacks the widespread support that SQL enjoys.
The setup process and deployment process for SAP HANA is complex.
Licensing costs with SAP HANA are very high.
Oracle has different components, so if you need security, you have to procure a different license, but here everything is inbuilt and it's not costly.
It's a recurring subscription model, which is expensive compared to legacy systems with just a maintenance fee.
SAP is not a cheap company, and its licenses are expensive.
I would rate the price for SAP HANA as high.
With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment.
The main feature we utilize in MySQL is the view, and I can say that it is the most valuable feature for our needs.
It allows programming, writing stored procedures, creating views, constraints, and triggers easily.
This architecture allows for faster data processing and real-time analytics that were not possible with traditional databases.
The concept enhances speed, allowing the database to serve and move data quickly.
One of our dashboards using Excelsius was previously developed on normal BW on Oracle data, which took 10 minutes to open. After developing the same calculation views using those tables and replacing them with calculation views in Excelsius, the dashboard opened in seconds.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| SAP HANA | 7.5% |
| MySQL | 6.1% |
| Other | 86.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 74 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
| Large Enterprise | 62 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 62 |
MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.
MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.
What are MySQL's key features?MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.
SAP HANA, also known as SAP High-performance Analytics Appliance, is a multi-model database that stores data in its memory, allowing users to avoid disk storage. The product combines its robust database with services for creating applications. SAP HANA is faster than other database management systems (DBMS) because it stores data in column-based tables in main memory and brings online analytical processing (OLAP) and online transaction processing (OLTP) together.
The column-oriented in-memory database design allows users to run high-speed transactions alongside advanced analytics, all in a single system. This provides companies with the ability to process very large amounts of data with low latency and query data in an instant. By combining multiple data management capabilities, the solution simplifies IT, helps businesses with innovations, and facilitates digital transformation.
The solution is structured into five groups of capabilities, categorized as:
There are three more SAP products that work alongside SAP HANA and complete the experience for users together. SAP S/4HANA Cloud is a ready-to-run cloud enterprise resource planning (ERP). SAP BW/4HANA is a packaged data warehouse, based on SAP HANA, which allows users to consolidate data across the enterprise to get a consistent view of their data. Finally, SAP Cloud is a single database as a service (DBaaS) foundation for modern applications and analytics across all enterprise data. All three products can combine with SAP HANA to deliver to users an optimized experience regarding their data.
SAP HANA Features
Each architectural group of capabilities of SAP HANA has various features that users can benefit from. These include:
SAP HANA Benefits
SAP HANA provides many benefits for its users. These include:
Reviews from Real Users
According to a database consultant at a pharma/biotech company, SAP HANA is a very robust solution with good data access.
Bruno V., owner at LAVORO AUTOM INF E COM LTDA, likes SAP HANA because the product offers advanced features, helps reduce hours, and makes it easy to find what you need.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.