"I am totally satisfied with MySQL."
"We use the basic features of MySQL. The interface that allows us to see the parameters of the server is good."
"However, it is easy to scale MySQL using the functions provided with the product."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its ubiquity. MySQL is everywhere, so if I need to find a developer to do things to it that I don't know, it's very easy to find someone who has expertise in it."
"MySQL is open-source. There are a lot of open-source communities trying to come up with their own patches, and to come up with their own features, which help MySQL develop faster than traditional databases like Oracle, which is closed source."
"One of the best features is this solution is easy to use."
"The initial setup was pretty straightforward. I would have worked with our IT team in terms of the initial setup."
"MySQL's clustering features are very strong, and you can automate scripting, so that helps. We wrote a Terraform script and ran it."
"The solution is easy to manage enterprise resources and the reporting and analytics are including. It is good for company growth and all module are managed well."
"The memory is the solution's most valuable feature. It's the main feature of HANA. Others are still the regular IT databases that are on storage and are therefore much slower than HANA. The solution is quite fast."
"It's easy to use, and the Hana Studio is pretty good."
"The solution offers advanced features that the company was struggling to implement."
"The solution is extremely stable. That's the most important aspect of the solution, for our organization. There is no downtime, and the performance is very good."
"We've had good experiences with technical support."
"The feature that I like the most is that we can transport the data to our web data application. SAP HANA's performance is really perfect. We're working on big data, and SAP HANA is really working on high performance. We are happy working with it."
"SAP HANA is vertically and horizontally scalable."
"It could be more secure."
"We want high availability and replication features, which are currently missing in this solution. It would be great if they can provide an in-built replication feature, similar to Oracle RAC, in MySQL."
"The product is a little bit complex and it is difficult to find sufficient documentation."
"The solution could be more secure."
"I would like to have the ability to cancel a query in SQL Developer."
"Rather than going in-depth about the technical features, which a technical person can directly tell, I would say that MySQL should be able to adapt to the next framework. The 5G framework means an unstructured framework. So if MySQL becomes smoother and more adaptable, it'll be easier."
"It is not as powerful as SQL Server. It can be more powerful. It is not scalable and has certain limitations, which is not the case with SQL Server."
"The manuals or documentation could be better."
"They can improve their technology for the CRM subsystem. There are other products that are better and more effective for the CRM subsystem. Its price could be better. It is expensive."
"The JDBC connectors are very slow."
"SAP HANA is not perfect and they could improve by having more options and more integration."
"There could be better management for faster updates, last year there were some changes in India to the e-invoicing feature."
"SAP HANA is a very proprietary tool and there's not as much support available for it as there is for an SQL Server (which is more popular)."
"There's an issue in the partition. When you record more than two million records, partitioning does not work well. In Oracle it's easy. SAP must resolve this issue in order to be more competitive with Oracle."
"It would be nice to know when SAP plans to stop its maintenance of a previous version of SAP ECC ERP because, at this point, anyone utilizing SAP will have no choice but to go on S/4HANA Database."
"The performance and integration with other products are areas in need of improvement."
MySQL is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases with 55 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 4th in Relational Databases with 25 reviews. MySQL is rated 8.0, while SAP HANA is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of MySQL writes "Good beginner base but it should have better support for backups". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Very robust solution with good data access". MySQL is most compared with Firebird SQL, Oracle Database, IBM Db2 Database, Teradata and Oracle Java DB, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, Apache Spark, IBM Db2 Database and Oracle Database In-Memory. See our MySQL vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
