Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Stackify comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Stackify are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.8, while Stackify is ranked #62. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.9% mindshare in APM, compared to Stackify’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Stackify users who would recommend it.

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Read 5 Amazon OpenSearch Service reviews

1,389 Views
1,273 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Stackify

Read 6 Stackify reviews

483 Views
341 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Stackify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Stackify and Amazon OpenSearch Service are leading solutions in performance monitoring and search functionalities, respectively. Amazon OpenSearch Service appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set that justifies the cost for larger-scale operations.

Features: Stackify offers deep application performance monitoring, error tracking capabilities, and straightforward deployment. Amazon OpenSearch Service is known for its robust search functionalities, scalability, and extensive features suitable for larger-scale operations.

Room for Improvement: Stackify could enhance integration options, provide more detailed documentation, and improve navigation. Amazon OpenSearch Service needs a smoother initial setup, more intuitive navigation, and better integration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stackify is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Amazon OpenSearch Service receives mixed reviews on deployment complexity but is commended for comprehensive support options.

Pricing and ROI: Stackify offers competitive pricing and delivers good ROI for smaller teams. Amazon OpenSearch Service, although more expensive, is seen as a worthwhile investment due to its extensive feature set and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Stackify Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Stackify

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

20th

Ranking in Log Management

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Stackify

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

62nd

Ranking in Log Management

62nd

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (58th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Amazon OpenSearch Service is 1.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stackify is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

VijayKumar27

Software Engineer at The American College

Effective as a vector store, serverless architecture but there aren't enough security features

The pricing aspect is a concern. The service is way too costly. For the past month, I used only 30 to 40 MB of data, and the cost was $500. AWS could improve pricing. Even being serverless, it incurs charges during idle times. For just holding data, you need to create a list. AWS should add an option to make data idle, so it won't include computing charges. They charge for OCU units based on the time the serverless solution is up, not on indexing or retrieval speed. Once the service starts, it starts getting billed. It would help if there were an option to limit computing. When using it as a database, storing data without frequent fetching would save computing costs.

Read full review

Moses Arigbede

Head of DevOps at Partsimony

Easy to set up with great custom dashboards but needs to improve non-.NET infrastructure

They need to improve non-.NET infrastructure. We always had difficulty when it comes to reporting or metrics that come from Linux operating systems and Docker containers. For anything that runs within the Unix environment, we always had problems with them, however, if it was a document-based application, Stackify was 100%, it gave everything. Now, the aggregation agent, the metric agent for Stackify for Linux, collects everything. When I say everything, I mean, everything. It collects so much information that we now started to term it as useless data as all that ingestion will just come in and overwhelm your log retention limit for the month and really this spike up your cost at the end of the month. You'll need to do a lot in order to train down the data coming in from all your Linux environments, to get to what you really need, which actually takes some time as well. I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines. Stackify has not really gotten that right, as far as I'm concerned. Netdata has done a better job and New Relic has also done a better job. They need to improve on that. We need to be able to see the individual resource usage of containers running within a particular host.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage"

"Amazon OpenSearch Service provides a managed database solution, so we don't need to manage everything ourselves."

"The business analytics capabilities are the most important feature it provides."

"I would definitely recommend Amazon OpenSearch Service to other professionals due to its fast and reliable search capabilities."

"This service already sorts data like vectors. They have classified the storage pre-defined."

"The customer service is excellent, rated nine out of ten."

"Amazon OpenSearch Service has enhanced our organization's ability to store and search large amounts of data efficiently."

"The filter feature on Stackify is one of the features I found valuable. It's awesome. When I want to get the application logs, the solution gives me many filters. For example, if I want to get logs from my test environment, the option is there for me to select the environment from Stackify, and you can also select the particular application, and you'll see the information you need there. The filter feature alone and the fact that Stackify offers a lot of different filters is what I like the most about the solution because I've used other tools with the filter feature, but the filtering was very difficult, versus Stackify that has good filtering. On Stackify, you can filter the information by the last one hour, or the last four hours, and you can also select the date range and specify the timestamp, then the solution will give you the information based on the date range you specified. Another feature I found valuable on Stackify is its rating feature because it tells you how your application is faring. For example, a rating of A means excellent, while a rating of F means very bad, or that your application is not doing well at all. The ratings are from A to F. I also like that Stackify helps you in terms of load management because the solution gives you information on overutilized resources. These are the most valuable features of the solution."

"The performance dashboard and the accurate level of details are beneficial."

"The deployment is very fast."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

Cons

"The price is fair yet leans towards the expensive side. I'd rate it five out of ten with respect to capabilities vs. cost."

"It would be beneficial to have some level of customization available in the managed service, tailored to the specific use cases of the end users."

"One improvement I would like to see is support for auto-scaling."

"They can enhance data visualization."

"We faced documentation challenges during integration after migrating from Elasticsearch to Amazon OpenSearch Service. Better documentation on integration, query handling, and a more user-friendly UI could enhance the product."

"The pricing aspect is a concern. The service is way too costly. For the past month, I used only 30 to 40 MB of data, and the cost was $500. AWS could improve pricing."

"I would like to be able to see metrics about individual running containers on the host machines."

"I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information."

"The search feature could be improved."

"It should be easily scalable and configurable in different instances."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price is variable. It depends on how much data we have received in that particular month. Usually, it goes up to $2,000, or, at times, $3,000 USD per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

16%

Media Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon OpenSearch Service?

We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon OpenSearch Service?

Amazon OpenSearch Service is a bit costly compared to self-hosted Elasticsearch due to the managed service pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon OpenSearch Service?

I did not delve deeply into Amazon OpenSearch Service, so I am unable to suggest specific improvements. However, we faced documentation challenges during integration after migrating from Elasticsea...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Grafana Loki vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 30% of the time

Datadog vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon OpenSearch Service Competitors

Dynatrace vs Stackify

Compared 43% of the time

New Relic vs Stackify

Compared 40% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Stackify

Compared 17% of the time

More Stackify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon OpenSearch Service

May 2025

Download Amazon OpenSearch Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Stackify

April 2025

Download Stackify product report

Overview

Amazon OpenSearch Service is often used for log analysis, real-time application monitoring, and searching large datasets. Users benefit from its scalability, ease of use, and AWS integration, appreciating its capability to handle high data volumes while providing efficient search functionalities.

Many users choose Amazon OpenSearch Service for its powerful search and indexing capabilities, real-time analytics, and strong integration with AWS services. Key highlights include minimal downtime, detailed documentation, and efficient data processing. Scalability and automatic scaling are standout features, enabling users to manage high data volumes seamlessly. However, there is a call for improved integration, enhanced stability, and better support. Some users find the setup and configuration process challenging and desire more customization options for security features.

What are the key features of Amazon OpenSearch Service?

Scalability: Automatically scales to accommodate data growth and workload fluctuations.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides up-to-date insights and monitoring for applications.
Integration with AWS: Easily integrates with other AWS services, enhancing workflows.
Powerful Search Capabilities: Fast and efficient search and indexing functionalities.
Detailed Documentation: Comprehensive guides and resources to assist users.
Security Features: Flexible security options to protect data and manage access.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Quick data processing and minimal downtime.
Scalability: Ability to handle increasing data volumes without manual intervention.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface and management tools.
Reliability: Consistent performance with robust support for data management workflows.
Integration: Seamless integration with existing AWS services and infrastructure.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Amazon OpenSearch Service is implemented to manage and analyze large datasets in real time. Companies benefit from its ability to monitor application performance, analyze log data, and enhance search functionalities, leading to improved operational efficiency and decision-making processes.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Stackify is an application performance management (APM) solution that combines application performance monitoring with logs, errors, and reporting. It is a SaaS solution that is developer-focused. Users can quickly scan, identify, and repair issues with applications. Stackify APM offers valuable tools, such as Prefix and Retrace, which help to make it a comprehensive and valuable APM solution. Stackify is now part of the Netreo family of IT Infrastructure Management (ITIM), which is considered one of the fastest-growing IT organizations in the marketplace today.

Stackify Prefix

Stackify Prefix helps developers write better code, faster. The tool examines, tests, and approves code as it is being written. Almost every new application is code-perfect, negating the need for exhausting troubleshooting and frustrating time-consuming code review.

Prefix is able to discover poor-performing SQL queries, ORM queries, potential bottlenecks, and concealed exceptions prior to moving the application into production.

Prefix offers Summary Dashboards, intuitive suggestions, integrated logs, and distributed tracing. Distributed tracing expands visibility to cloud-native applications, microservices, and containers and can also provide additional transparency to cache services, web services, third-party services, and more. Users are able to easily move from logs to traces and back.

This valuable tool ensures developers are able to consistently release the best code possible in the least amount of time, while improving performance, productivity, and profitability.

Prefix is a very robust and easy-to-use tool. It can be used seamlessly with Linux, macOS, and Windows. Prefix integrates well with numerous languages, such as Java, Python, Ruby, PHP, Node.js, .Net, and .Net Core.

Stackify Retrace

Stackify Retrace is a user-friendly, trusted APM solution used in more than fifty countries worldwide. Users know that Retrace is able to ensure they can complete quicker, more efficient application development and consistently enhance overall application performance by suggesting important intuitive suggestions users need.

This solution is beneficial to both developers (Dev) and operations (Ops) personnel to learn to improve code and immediately finetune issues by:

Establishing effortless collaboration between Dev and Ops personnel via an easy-to-use GUI dashboard.
Delivering complete transparency of all stages of the application development process, from pre-development to production.
Utilizing performance protocols, such as error tracking, application logs, and code profiling, in real time in order to thoroughly understand how long a code will take to complete various tasks.
Improving overall efficiency and productivity by immediately discovering and repairing application issues.

Retrace Real User Monitoring (RUM) uses both front-end and back-end monitoring to give users a complete picture of what is going on with the applications. This intuitive dashboard displays performance with a complete breakdown of resource usage and integrates the server-side and client traces into one engaging, user-friendly, extensive view.

Retrace is an out-of-the-box solution that works seamlessly with Java stacks, PHP, Node.js, Ruby, Python, .Net, and .Net Core. It is also compatible with many of today’s popular frameworks, such as AWS, Azure, Elasticsearch, MongoDB, MySQL, Oracle, PostgreSQL, Redis, and SQL Server. Additionally, Retrace will work effectively with many cloud providers, containers, and languages, and offers excellent and easy integration with today's favorite tools such as Jira, Slack, Jenkins, and more.

Stackify

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

MyRacePass, ClearSale, Newitts, Carbonite, Boston Software, Children's International, Starkwood Media Group, Fewzion

Buyer's Guide

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Stackify

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Stackify

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Stackify and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Stackify report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.