We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable solution."
"Break down your application into small modules to improve resiliency"
"The product helps us to configure the new environment."
"The stability is excellent."
"Through Amazon EKS, we can have the blue-green deployment very easily."
"The most valuable feature is the computing speed."
"It's the best option for medium or large enterprises."
"The solution is easy-to-set up."
"The automatic learning and an AI engine help to find more modern vulnerability problems."
"Overall, it provides good security."
"The ability to integrate it with Microsoft Azure Sentinel allows us to validate the logs in an even more complex and meaningful way."
"The new scanning function is a valuable feature that wasn't available until recently."
"The visibility in our cloud environment is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is posture management, which gives you complete visibility of all your assets in the cloud and allows you to do governance and compliance."
"The audit feature is the most valuable for compliance reasons. It gives you a full view of the whole environment, no matter how many accounts you have in AWS or Azure. You have it all under one umbrella."
"Dome9 has improved our organization; we have a centralized view of all of our assets, our visible assets our ECs, our inventories. And then all the policies are centralized, and it is easier to manage because everything is one component console."
"Amazon EKS is predominately public. However, the government has started to have a lot of interest in Kubernetes and is receiving more education on Kubernetes and Amazon EKS. If we can have the security of Amazon EKS align with the security that is set out by the government it would be much better."
"They need to work on the Amazon plugins on the Kubernetes cluster."
"They should include some essential configuration features to it."
"Amazon EKS should improve its integration."
"An area for improvement in Amazon EKS is the user experience. The platform could be more user-friendly. Only an expert can manage and use it."
"The tool's setup is complex."
"I'm having difficulty getting my AWS clusters to communicate with my local machine."
"I would like to see it a little more stable, more operational, and more convenient to develop."
"Compliance checks on cloud resources against various industry standards and compliance framework templates need to be improved."
"Down the road, we would like to see automation. That is probably a feature that most people want. If they can automate patching a vulnerability, it will be much easier."
"The biggest thing is the documentation aspect of Dome9 is a little lacking. They were purchased by Check Point about a year and a half to two years ago. When they integrated into Check Point's support system, a lot of the documentation that they had previously got mangled in the transition, e.g., linking to stuff on the Dome9 website that no longer exists. There are still a lot of spaces with incomplete links and stuff that is not as fully explained as it could be."
"Check Point must provide a multi-cloud facility where AWS, Azure, and GCP can seamlessly work together and display posture in an integrated manner."
"The technical support could be better, but I do not know of any other needed improvements."
"The tool should incorporate more use cases like improving security scores. It should also improve documentation."
"The Check Point Infinity admin portal sometimes freezes."
"The user interface could be improved. Sometimes, the visibility is not immediately available for the environment. We have the native servers that come with the solutions, but we cannot see them in the Check Point log. Another issue is with the integrated file monitoring. It would make sense to have stuff like file integrity monitoring and malware scanning available within this module because we don't want to integrate another product."
Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 38 reviews while Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 6th in Container Management with 63 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "An easily downloadable solution that enables containerization without relying on cloud infrastructure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". Amazon EKS is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs and Linode, whereas Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR. See our Amazon EKS vs. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
