Amazon Aurora vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.3% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon Aurora

Read 18 Amazon Aurora reviews

2,869 Views
2,554 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 20 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

223 Views
158 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Amazon Aurora

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and Amazon Aurora compete in the cloud-based database solutions category, each targeting distinct organizational needs. Amazon Aurora seems to have the upper hand due to its superior scalability and performance.

Features: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers robust data management, seamless Oracle ecosystem integration, and strong support channels. Amazon Aurora features high availability, automatic scaling, and deep integration with AWS services, appealing to users seeking an AWS-centric solution.

Room for Improvement: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service could enhance interoperability with non-Oracle products and improve scalability for dynamic workloads. It might also benefit from streamlined maintenance operations. Amazon Aurora could improve cost efficiency for smaller setups, enhance user-friendliness for AWS newcomers, and provide greater transparency in pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers straightforward deployment with extensive Oracle support. Amazon Aurora benefits from a highly automated deployment process and easily integrates with AWS management tools, providing a smooth experience for AWS-seasoned teams.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service provides cost-effective options with flexible pricing plans, ensuring a predictable investment and prompt ROI. Amazon Aurora, though potentially higher in initial costs, justifies its expense with performance efficiency and low maintenance, promising long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora is 3.3%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Rajitha Jatothu

Aws Devops Engineer at LTIMindtree

Achieve high performance with fault-tolerant and highly available database management

Aurora is a key pillar for us, offering performance and availability. It is faster than RDS and supports multi-region clusters and scalability. One feature we value is Aurora's ability to provide a reader endpoint, allowing applications to connect without tracking replicas. It supports auto-scaling and offers several options for monitoring and optimizing database performance. Aurora's fault tolerance and ability to handle multiple replicas contribute to its reliability and high performance.

Read full review

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features is storage scaling."

"Amazon Aurora stands out for its ease of use in a managed environment, inbuilt security, continuous backups, numerous read replicas, multi-region automated replication, and seamless integration with other AWS services."

"The most valuable features of Amazon Aurora include the global instance with the global writer endpoint, which allows failovers and instance switches without requiring changes in my code, thanks to the default global Route 53 endpoint."

"Aurora is a key pillar for us, offering performance and availability."

"One of the standout features of Amazon Aurora is that we do not need to maintain disaster recovery or manage availability zones."

"The solution’s scalability is good since we don’t need to take a maintenance window during unpredictable workloads. I like the solution’s behind-the-scenes happenings. It is a great feature."

"The provision of custom read and write endpoints eliminates the need for managing a separate proxy load balancer."

"We had better control over the parameters that we could tweak in terms of intermediate storage and better indexing capabilities."

More Amazon Aurora pros

"It is very easy to start working with the product."

"It's easy to use."

"MySQL is a centralized RDBMS in itself, and you don't have the overkill of having the full Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server. It's ideal, and it helps with the developer console. It has three versions for developers. It's a very good tool for open source."

"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."

"It is an established open-source database with a vast array of resources available, ensuring you can learn everything needed."

"The stability of the solution is very good. I wouldn't have used it for the past seven years if I was not satisfied."

"The product is good for tuning."

"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

Cons

"It would have been helpful if they had provided some benchmarking numbers."

"A challenge I noticed is during migration from PostgreSQL RDS to Amazon Aurora. There are technical challenges, such as the inability to provision the database using a PostgreSQL snapshot directly."

"In Oracle, tools like Veridata allow for comparing databases and certifying data accuracy, even offering repair capabilities, which are missing in Aurora. There should be a similar comparison tool in Aurora."

"The product's distributed query process for MySQL needs improvement."

"There is improvement needed to have more developer focus. Additionally, it would be helpful to have a stand-alone solution outside of Amazon. Amazon has a tendency to favor developing web-based clients, which may not always provide the fastest or most responsive solution as desired."

"One of the most valuable features is storage scaling."

"I would like to see more AI-related features in future releases."

"It is a bit costly. The features are quite good, and I wouldn't say it requires any technical improvements. But from a cost perspective, some clients wouldn't go for Aurora because of that."

More Amazon Aurora cons

"The product has many bugs."

"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."

"There could be more courses where the people could learn more easily how to use the tool."

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions."

"There might be minor improvements, however, I can’t identify any particular areas for improvement at the moment."

"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."

"There could be improvements, particularly in Firebird, where the indexing is limited to just a single B-tree index, leading to poor performance for large-scale queries."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"The tool’s pricing depends on the instance type. For cost optimization purposes, we use the result instance category."

"It is quite expensive."

"There is no need to buy a license for the product. We can pay as per the use case."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The price could be lower compared to its competitors."

"It is an open-source product."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"The product is expensive."

"The license is expensive."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Aurora?

Aurora's compatibility with MySQL or PostgreSQL benefited our database management. The migration from on-premise MySQL to Aurora was similar, so we didn't need to change our source code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora?

The pricing for Amazon Aurora is nearly the same as RDS, with Aurora offering additional functionalities. This makes the product cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora?

There are tuning challenges. The same methods used for tuning in RDS might not work in Aurora, and some functionalities available in MySQL may not be compatible with Aurora. There's also a concern ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

See all answers

Comparisons

SQL Server vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 35% of the time

Oracle Database vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 24% of the time

MariaDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 8% of the time

Citus Data vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 7% of the time

YugabyteDB vs Amazon Aurora

Compared 6% of the time

More Amazon Aurora Competitors

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 55% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 45% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora

April 2025

Download Amazon Aurora product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

April 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Overview

Amazon Aurora is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud, that combines the performance and availability of traditional enterprise databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases.

Amazon Aurora is up to five times faster than standard MySQL databases and three times faster than standard PostgreSQL databases. It provides the security, availability, and reliability of commercial databases at 1/10th the cost. Amazon Aurora is fully managed by Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), which automates time-consuming administration tasks like hardware provisioning, database setup, patching, and backups.

Amazon Aurora features a distributed, fault-tolerant, self-healing storage system that auto-scales up to 64TB per database instance. It delivers high performance and availability with up to 15 low-latency read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across three Availability Zones (AZs).

Visit the Amazon RDS Management Console to create your first Aurora database instance and start migrating your MySQL and PostgreSQL databases.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Dow Jones, Arizona State University, Verizon, Capital One, United Nations, Nielsen, Autodesk, Fanduel

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Aurora vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.