Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs PostgreSQL comparison

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 128 PostgreSQL reviews

14,910 Views
11,779 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

PostgreSQL and Oracle MySQL Cloud Service compete in the database management system category. PostgreSQL has the upper hand due to its open-source nature, comprehensive feature set, and strong community support.

Features: PostgreSQL offers comprehensive features like spatial support, making it suitable for GIS applications like QGIS and PostGIS. It includes full-text search, easy replication mechanisms, and supports JSON, XML, and arrays. Its extensive extensions like PostGIS enhance its capabilities. In contrast, Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, while stable, lacks open-source benefits and is more restrictive in terms of JSONB support and indexing features.

Room for Improvement: PostgreSQL users seek improved user-friendliness, better input/output tools, and more efficient database upgrades and restoration processes. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service faces criticism for its performance limitations, particularly on Windows, and demands enhancements in scalability and ease of integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PostgreSQL is versatile, supporting hybrid, private, and public cloud environments and on-premises setups. It relies on a strong open-source community for support. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service focuses on public and hybrid cloud deployments and receives praise for its ease of setup but garners criticism for relying on paid support.

Pricing and ROI: PostgreSQL's open-source nature makes it cost-effective with no licensing fees, translating to significant ROI benefits, particularly attractive for startups. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service, on the other hand, tends to be expensive and its licensing costs can negatively impact ROI, although it offers features that cater to enterprise needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL Report (Updated: November 2026).

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PostgreSQL

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Open Source Databases

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (11th)

PostgreSQL

Ranking in Open Source Databases

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

128

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Open Source Databases category, the mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 2.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PostgreSQL is 11.5%, down from 16.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Open Source Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PostgreSQL	11.5%
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service	2.3%
Other	86.2%

Open Source Databases

Featured Reviews

Roberto Stern

Director at Adamos Tecnologia

Efficiently manages extensive datasets with rapid connections and wide tool support

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to manage and install. It does not require a DBA for management. The connections are very fast and it supports several thousand users simultaneously without any issues. New connections do not hang server operations. As soon as new releases are put out, they work as expected. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is supported by every vendor and tool, including architectural, integration, and generation tools, offering wide protocol support. This makes Oracle MySQL Cloud Service a valuable solution.

Read full review

Shobhit Goel

Data Science Architect at publicis Sapient

High-volume transactions have reduced failures and improve customer service efficiency

The best feature is performance, because of which I decided on PostgreSQL. I have also enabled the PG vector plugin on top of PostgreSQL. I have the opportunity to use two different features and two different flavors in a single product, which is the best thing about PostgreSQL. Initially, we had some hiccups around the performance part, but later we did indexing in PostgreSQL and now it is working very well. Even when we are doing 100,000 transactions in a day, PostgreSQL is working excellently. The interface is another best feature. If I need to do any query, I simply install the plugin on my local, which is pgAdmin. Through pgAdmin, I am able to communicate with PostgreSQL and execute all my SQL queries. I am getting a better UI with PostgreSQL as the backend, which is also one of the best options. PG vector is also very strong from PostgreSQL where I have implemented RAG and on a daily basis, I inject thousands of pages of PDF. More than 100 PDFs are coming into my system and one PDF is around 1,000 pages. We are injecting them into PostgreSQL and converting them into dimensions and inserting them into PG vector. The level of transactions we are doing on a daily basis is substantial, and we are getting very good throughput and low latency from PostgreSQL. When we were doing more than 50,000 transactions in a minute with the previous database, we were getting a lot of latency issues with threads getting blocked and abruptly closed unwantedly. After doing extensive research, we decided to move to PostgreSQL. Now, we are doing around 100,000 transactions in PostgreSQL and we are getting good throughput with no latency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very easy to start working with the product."

"The solution overall is very, very good. It's got good integration with other databases and adds new features often."

"The scalability of the database is absolutely guaranteed by the new features."

"It's easy to use."

"My advice to anybody who is researching this solution is that it is a better option than other solutions."

"The most valuable aspect of the product is data migration."

"It’s easy to implement and affordable."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

"We are able to create many different types of jobs and items with this solution making it one of the most valuable features."

"It is easy to install and easy to manage."

"It has allowed us to run a Scada database, which reads data every 2 minutes, and it does this in a very smooth way."

"This is an open-source solution, operates at a high speed, and supports more than one SQL language."

"Currently this is one of the best solutions on the market."

"I think this is the only decent solution for a relational database in web development."

"PostgreSQL has offered similar performance for our workloads with lower cost."

"This is an open-source product with advanced features that support OLTP/OLAP applications with the following benefits that helps organizations grow: No recurring licensing cost, huge cost savings forever, no vendor lock in, one-time migration cost, yearly major releases, increase in profit margins, completely open source, community-based FREE support available, and commercial support option."

Cons

"There could be improvements, particularly in Firebird, where the indexing is limited to just a single B-tree index, leading to poor performance for large-scale queries."

"Integrating business intelligence or NLP solutions would help us save time and would prevent us from having to take a deep dive. Data problems seem to multiply on the system when you interact with it. Automation would save a lot of man-hours."

"There might be minor improvements, however, I can’t identify any particular areas for improvement at the moment."

"The product has many bugs."

"There could be more courses where the people could learn more easily how to use the tool."

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."

"Relational databases, in general, are not known to be as scalable as NoSQL databases."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

"It would be good to have machine learning functionality in this solution, similar to Microsoft SQL Server and other solutions. Machine learning capability for a basic level or a common user would be useful. It can also have good reporting capabilities."

"JSON support although great, it still has some gotchas, querying and manipulating JSON will be one of the topics I'd like to see some improvement, still feels not natural to work with it."

"Performance and scalability are areas where PostgreSQL can be improved."

"I would love to have primary keys on views. This function missing has made PostgreSQL harder than need be with Microsoft Access as a front end."

"PostgreSQL’s performance could be improved."

"The partitioning is still very basic and not touched for years."

"When you get a large number of records in a database and start doing various queries, it can adversely impact the performance of the live running systems. That's an area we continue to look at and mean to improve, but it is not only because of PostgreSQL. It is also because of the way the schemas are put together, and certain events are triggered. So, it is because of both parties."

"I would like to see it be more reliable, and easier if possible, to make PostgreSQL clusters - more machines working together as a single instance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"The license is expensive."

"The product is expensive."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"It is an open-source product."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"We do not pay for licensing."

"It is an open-source platform."

"It is open source. There is no licensing."

"This solution can offer a cheaper choice for customers since it is open-source."

"PostgreSQL is a free and open-source database."

"We use the open-source version of PostgreSQL and not the enterprise edition."

"It is open-source. If you use it on-premise, it is free. It also has enterprise or commercial versions. If you go for the cloud version, there will be a cost, but it is lower than Oracle or Microsoft."

"It is also open-source so it is free."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

16%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	26
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

What is your primary use case for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I work in finance, financial services, banking, and financial services.

How does Firebird SQL compare with PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL was designed in a way that provides you with not only a high degree of flexibility but also offers you a cheap and easy-to-use solution. It gives you the ability to redesign and audit yo...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PostgreSQL?

I am not directly involved in the licensing or procurement decisions, so I cannot comment in detail on the price. From an engineering perspective, PostgreSQL is cost-efficient because it is open so...

What needs improvement with PostgreSQL?

While improving reliability, I have noticed that the limitations in PostgreSQL can be complex. For large-scale deployments, configuration, performance tuning, and related tasks can be complex and i...

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparisons

Compared 12% of the time

SQL Server vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon Aurora vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Firebird SQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 11% of the time

MySQL vs PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

MariaDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

OpenSearch vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

LanceDB vs PostgreSQL

Compared 5% of the time

Product Reports

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

October 2026

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Download PostgreSQL product report

October 2026

Overview

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service boasts autonomous capabilities, scalability, and robust integration ideal for large-scale database management. Users appreciate its open-source flexibility and comprehensive support.

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers a strong platform for managing vast databases, integrating advanced InnoDB features along with support for JSON and geographical queries. It is designed for ease of use with enhanced scalability and no requirement for a dedicated DBA, facilitating straightforward installation and management. Valued for its stable performance, the service supports a wide range of protocols and fast connections, aided by detailed documentation. However, improvements are desired in areas like business intelligence integration, automation, and Windows performance.

What are the key features of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Autonomous Capabilities: Automates database management tasks, enhancing efficiency.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to growing data and user demand.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with platforms such as MariaDB and AWS.
InnoDB Features: Offers advanced table and transaction support for optimized data handling.
JSON & Geographical Queries: Supports modern data processing needs.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Affordability: Cost-effective solutions for database management.
Flexibility: Open-source structure allows customization.
Performance: Provides stable and reliable system behavior.
Connection Speed: Ensures quick access and data processing.
Documentation: Extensive resources aid in user support and troubleshooting.

Users employ Oracle MySQL Cloud Service in sectors like publishing, healthcare, and financial services, leveraging it for data management, analytics, and cloud migrations. It supports a wide range of applications, from student information management to mobile app services, bolstering projects with comprehensive platform integration capabilities.

Oracle

PostgreSQL is a versatile and reliable database management system commonly used for web development, data analysis, and building scalable databases.

It offers advanced features like indexing, replication, and transaction management. Users appreciate its flexibility, performance, and ability to handle large amounts of data efficiently. Its robustness, scalability, and support for complex queries make it highly valuable.

Additionally, PostgreSQL's extensibility, flexibility, community support, and frequent updates contribute to its ongoing improvement and stability.

Sample Customers

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

1. Apple 2. Cisco 3. Fujitsu 4. Instagram 5. Netflix 6. Red Hat 7. Sony 8. Uber 9. Cisco Systems 10. Skype 11. LinkedIn 12. Etsy 13. Yelp 14. Reddit 15. Dropbox 16. Slack 17. Twitch 18. WhatsApp 19. Snapchat 20. Shazam 21. SoundCloud 22. The New York Times 23. Cisco WebEx 24. Atlassian 25. Cisco Meraki 26. Heroku 27. GitLab 28. Zalando 29. OpenTable 30. Trello 31. Square Enix 32. Bloomberg