We performed a comparison between Alfresco and Jive based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the searching elements of the metadata."
"The product allows engineering teams and developers to introduce new things in a seamless and easy way."
"Document repository."
"I like the ease of use, sections, and calendar."
"We are able to handle more than one hundred POs at any given time with their shipping docs and info, with only one person in charge."
"Alfresco has a very steep learning curve, and unfortunately, during the learning process, it's very easy to make errors, which often are unforgiving."
"I would like them to consider document capture functionality."
"Metadata, auto class, disposition log, and legal hold."
"I think the presentation layer could be improved - currently, it's too complex, and there are too many features cluttered all over the screen."
"The search engine could be improved and also provide some kind of indexing."
Earn 20 points
Alfresco is ranked 9th in Enterprise Content Management while Jive is ranked 31st in Enterprise Content Management. Alfresco is rated 8.0, while Jive is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Alfresco writes "Flexible and customizable but lacking integration with Microsoft". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jive writes "Used by our agile teams instead of email to track impediments". Alfresco is most compared with SharePoint, Hyland OnBase, IBM FileNet, OpenText Documentum and OpenText Extended ECM, whereas Jive is most compared with Yammer and Atlassian Confluence. See our Alfresco vs. Jive report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.