Akamai CloudTest vs Apache JMeter comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Akamai and Apache are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #13, while Apache is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Akamai holds a 3.1% mindshare in PTT, compared to Apache’s 8.9% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Apache users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

1,679 Views
1,360 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Apache JMeter

Read 97 Apache JMeter reviews

10,605 Views
5,939 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

Apache JMeter

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Akamai CloudTest and Apache JMeter compete in the load testing tools category, with each offering unique strengths. Akamai CloudTest appears to have the upper hand when it comes to real-time analytics and comprehensive testing scenarios, whereas Apache JMeter stands out for its flexibility and community support.

Features: Akamai CloudTest provides real-time insights and can handle complex test scenarios across distributed networks. It supports a variety of testing types, including load, performance, and usability. Apache JMeter offers great scripting capabilities, supports performance testing at scale, and is backed by a large selection of plugins, making it highly extensible.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could benefit from enhanced flexibility in scripting capabilities and reduced costs. Greater compatibility with different testing tools would be a valuable addition. Apache JMeter can improve by enhancing its real-time data visualization and user interface and expanding its customer support offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai CloudTest offers a seamless deployment process with strong customer support, assisting throughout setup and execution phases. Apache JMeter provides ease of use through its open-source model, facilitating integration and customizations with broad community-based support.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest generally involves higher initial setup costs but promises significant ROI for enterprises needing extensive testing infrastructure. Apache JMeter, being open-source, has minimal setup costs and offers excellent ROI for those who can maximize its extensive features without commercial fees.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. Apache JMeter Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Apache JMeter

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,148 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

13th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Apache JMeter

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.1%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Apache JMeter is 8.9%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache JMeter	8.9%
Akamai CloudTest	3.1%
Other	88.0%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

TusharShankar

QA Manager at Synechron

Performance testing has become central and reporting has provided clear insights for our teams

We do have command prompt related or CLI functionality with Apache JMeter, so it is easier. However, since it is open source, much work has not been put into the GUI part. The GUI could definitely be enhanced. One drawback which I can see when I compare it with other tools is the amount of cache that it uses, the memory that it uses. It becomes very difficult to work with when we have a lot of requests that need to be processed. Anything more than 10,000 requests becomes a bit of an unfavorable task when using Apache JMeter altogether. Otherwise, it does help anyone who is starting off with performance testing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The agents on the cloud have been extremely valuable for us."

"The solution is very stable."

"Soasta CloudTest is an integral part of our performance testing strategy and key in generating load across geography."

"Customer service is great; quick to act on everything."

"The solution was easy to set-up and much more easy and intuitive to build performance tests."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"Akamai Cloud Test provides detailed analysis during load and performance testing which helps in determining different components of our platforms and external integrations with other vendors needs optimization (i.e.) it highlights exact API call with request, response, error, TTFB to identify root cause of failure which in turn helps in improving time to resolution and prioritize change requests."

More Akamai CloudTest pros

"They found that JMeter has more capabilities and specificity than the tools they were using."

"For those who do not want to spend money on tools then this solution would be a good choice."

"I definitely recommend Apache JMeter to other users because it is an open-source tool; compared to LoadRunner, you save a significant amount of money, installation is hassle-free, and there are no additional components compared to other tools."

"JMeter is very easy for a user who doesn't have too much programming knowledge, as scripting is not mandatory nor essential to create the testing scenarios."

"To me, what's most valuable in Apache JMeter is that it's a lightweight tool for application testing."

"It's easy to set up."

"The performance of the solution is excellent."

"We had some challenges testing HTTP/2 APIs, which are becoming more prevalent with advancements like 5G. So, we added another plugin to help with HTTP/2 API load testing. Apache JMeter, with additional plugins, now supports HTTP/2, which is critical as everyone moves from HTTP/1 to HTTP/2."

More Apache JMeter pros

Cons

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

"Out of five, I would rate the technical support of the solution at two or three. Sometimes it's a challenge because we face delays."

"Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization."

"One of the challenges with Soasta is availability and quick access to their technical support documentation and on-call support."

"The UI gets stuck sometimes; pulling huge load test data takes time and the UI often gets stuck."

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

More Akamai CloudTest cons

"If the solution was GUI based, I believe that it would be more versatile."

"Running JMeter in GUI mode uses a lot of memory, which means we need to switch to a non-GUI mode when using a heavy load."

"JMeter output reports can be difficult to understand without training."

"There is some work to be done with the integration."

"The solution's setup could be easier and security could be improved to minimize vulnerabilities."

"Currently, the integration pipeline is implemented by using Jenkins or a similar tool platform. These are continuous integration tools. As far as I know, integration is done by using custom scripts. It would be good if the integration with a continuous integration pipeline, like Jenkins or Hudson, can be done out of the box without using a script."

"With JMeter, with banking encryption, we have struggled a lot; it's not as good as other paid tools that provide support and configuration capabilities that JMeter lacks."

"Apache should have a graphic interface. That would help beginner users a lot. Sometimes it's hard to do what you need to do via the command line."

More Apache JMeter cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"Running cost is very low."

"The tool is open-source."

"The solution is open source."

"It is open source. There are no licensing costs associated. If you need enterprise support, you'll probably end up paying for a license. You would also factor in the infrastructure cost, but that's not significant."

"It is free."

"The solution is open source with no user fees or licenses."

"We are using the free version."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs involved."

"The solution is open-source."

More Apache JMeter pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	62

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Postman compare with Apache JMeter?

Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share t...

See all answers

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache JMeter?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost and license are free because Apache JMeter is open source.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 21% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 5% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Apache JMeter

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Apache JMeter

Compared 6% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Apache JMeter

Compared 6% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Apache JMeter

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Apache JMeter

Compared 5% of the time

More Apache JMeter Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

November 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Apache JMeter

November 2026

Download Apache JMeter product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

JMeter

Overview

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?

Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai

Apache JMeter is a versatile, open-source tool designed for performance and load testing, widely recognized for its user-friendly interface and robust test automation capabilities. It supports a range of protocols and integrates seamlessly into various environments, making it ideal for high-load scenarios.

Apache JMeter stands out in performance testing for its ability to handle high transactions per second and perform distributed load testing effectively. Its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness are enhanced by its user-friendly GUI, which simplifies the testing process. Despite memory consumption concerns, Apache JMeter remains a top choice due to its large community support, comprehensive scripting capabilities, and easy integration with CI/CD pipelines, allowing for continuous automated testing. Its robust protocol support meets diverse testing needs.

What are Apache JMeter's key features?

User-Friendly GUI: Simplifies test creation and management.
Open-Source: Offers flexibility and community support.
Protocol Support: Handles multiple protocols effectively.
Integration: Works seamlessly with tools like Jenkins.
Scripting: Extensive scripting abilities for custom tests.
Platform Independence: Operates on various operating systems.

Which benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: No licensing fees due to open-source status.
Community Support: Access to a large user base for help and updates.
Scalability: Effective in high-load scenarios with distributed testing capabilities.
Automation: Integration with CI/CD for continuous testing.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides detailed performance insights.

In industries like finance and banking, Apache JMeter is used extensively for performance validation to ensure system robustness under heavy user loads. It's integrated into CI/CD pipelines for automated testing processes, allowing organizations to simulate real-world scenarios and ensure high-performance standards.

Apache

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Apache JMeter

October 2026

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. Apache JMeter

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. Apache JMeter and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. Apache JMeter report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.