"ActivTrack has a range of features, including a detailed dashboard, alert monitoring, screenshots, and report generation. Overall, ActivTrak has worked as advertised, and we're happy. Our favorite feature is probably the alerts. ActivTrack warns employees when they break the rules, which helps us keep staff in check."
"The reporting feature was the key differentiator. I also liked the ability to create dynamic rules in the environment."
"I prefer an on-prem deployment, but ActivTrak currently doesn't offer this. It would address privacy concerns that come up for end-users. I would also love it if monitoring could be expanded to company mobile phones. This will enable us to track and maintain productivity on devices like that."
"It could be more stable."
ActivTrack is ranked 13th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 1 review while Gurucul is ranked 15th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 1 review. ActivTrack is rated 9.0, while Gurucul is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ActivTrack writes "It makes employees more conscious of what they're do on the clock, helping us to deliver better services to our clients". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Gurucul writes "A unified security and risk analytics solution with a useful reporting feature, but it could be more stable". ActivTrack is most compared with , whereas Gurucul is most compared with Securonix Next-Gen SIEM, Exabeam Fusion SIEM and Splunk User Behavior Analytics.
See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.
We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
