Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Fortinet FortiWeb, Azure Front Door, and AWS WAF.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Barracuda Networks Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Barracuda Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Fortinet FortiWeb emphasizes robust pricing and in-house support, ideal for businesses needing substantial control and comprehensive application-layer security. In comparison, Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service offers cloud-based agility and streamlined deployment, appealing to those prioritizing scalability and ease of management with subscription pricing.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service focuses on simplicity with intuitive threat protection and DDoS mitigation. In comparison, Azure Front Door offers extensive integration and scalability with robust load balancing. Barracuda is ideal for cost-conscious users, whereas Azure appeals to those needing comprehensive features and Microsoft ecosystem integration.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service has a straightforward setup cost, while Azure Front Door may involve more complex initial setup expenses. Pricing differences highlight Barracuda’s simplicity in setup against Azure's potential for higher initial configuration investments.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service has a straightforward setup cost, while Azure Front Door may involve more complex initial setup expenses. Pricing differences highlight Barracuda’s simplicity in setup against Azure's potential for higher initial configuration investments.
AWS WAF offers attractive pricing and seamless integration within AWS, appealing to cost-conscious AWS users. In comparison, Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service provides robust features and simplified management, appealing to those valuing advanced threat protection and dedicated support, despite higher upfront costs.
AWS WAF involves a pay-as-you-go pricing model, incurring minimal setup costs, while Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service typically includes upfront fees, highlighting a key distinction between the initial financial commitments required for each service.
AWS WAF involves a pay-as-you-go pricing model, incurring minimal setup costs, while Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service typically includes upfront fees, highlighting a key distinction between the initial financial commitments required for each service.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service provides cost-effective security with simple deployment and responsive support, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall delivers comprehensive features and scalability, making it a strong contender for those investing in robust, long-term security solutions.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service has a straightforward setup cost, while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall requires a higher initial investment. The pricing difference highlights Barracuda's approachability for budget-conscious users compared to Cloudflare's premium setup.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service has a straightforward setup cost, while Cloudflare Web Application Firewall requires a higher initial investment. The pricing difference highlights Barracuda's approachability for budget-conscious users compared to Cloudflare's premium setup.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service attracts with its competitive pricing and ease of deployment. In comparison, Azure Web Application Firewall offers extensive integration with Azure's ecosystem. Barracuda appeals to budget-conscious users, while Azure is ideal for those deeply embedded in other Azure services.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service has minimal setup costs, while Azure Web Application Firewall incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost difference in setup between the two solutions.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service has minimal setup costs, while Azure Web Application Firewall incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting a cost difference in setup between the two solutions.
Sucuri is known for its simplicity, affordability, and focus on performance, making it ideal for smaller enterprises. In comparison, Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service offers advanced features and robust protection, appealing to businesses needing comprehensive security and enhanced threat management.
Sucuri has a low setup cost, making it an economically appealing choice, while Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service involves higher initial expenses, which can impact budget allocation for some businesses.
Sucuri has a low setup cost, making it an economically appealing choice, while Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service involves higher initial expenses, which can impact budget allocation for some businesses.
