

Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service and Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) compete in the web application firewall sector. Barracuda emphasizes ease of deployment and speed, while Check Point focuses on intelligence and comprehensive threat prevention. Barracuda seems to have the upper hand in ease of deployment with fast setup and integration, while Check Point excels with its AI-driven threat detection capabilities.
Features: Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service includes automatic security updates, real-time attack detection, and centralized management. It offers DDoS protection across L3 and L7, enhancing deployment speed and efficiency. Check Point WAF provides advanced AI-driven threat detection, contextual machine learning for threat prevention, and zero-day attack protection, improving detection accuracy and reducing manual intervention.
Room for Improvement: Barracuda users note pricing complexity, a lack of local data storage capabilities, and a desire for a more intuitive interface. Some stability concerns and integration challenges with security tools are also highlighted. Check Point users mention the need for UI improvements, better documentation, and a simpler initial setup. The product's pricing is also considered high, with some users experiencing latency issues.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is praised for its quick deployment on multiple cloud platforms and effective customer support. Check Point WAF supports various deployment environments, including hybrid solutions, but users suggest simplifying its deployment processes. Check Point's customer support, while well-rated, could benefit from enhanced efficiency and multilingual accessibility.
Pricing and ROI: Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is seen as cost-efficient with a good ROI due to automated updates and reduced administrative costs. Users appreciate its ease of management and threat reduction capabilities. Check Point WAF, despite being more expensive, is valued for its extensive feature set. Users acknowledge its pricing complexity but find its comprehensive security features justify the cost.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service has positively impacted our organization by reducing cyber threats like ransomware and phishing by ninety-five percent.
For us, the biggest value comes from improved security and the reduced workload on the team, which makes the investment feel justified.
From an ROI and impact perspective, there is a 20 to 35% reduction in day-to-day administrative effort.
When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.
When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.
Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.
We had an incident requiring direct support, and the representatives were really helpful, resolving our query within forty-five minutes.
The engineers were helpful and knowledgeable, and we were able to get the guidance we needed.
I would rate Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service customer support as a nine on a scale of one to ten.
They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.
Scalability is good for Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service; we can scale up or down based on our needs.
As our needs have grown and we have added more applications, it has handled this expansion without creating extra management overhead.
If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.
They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.
We have not faced any downtime, crashes, or lag.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is extremely accurate in detection and reporting, and I find very few false positives.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service has been stable in our experience, and we have not faced any major downtime or service-impacting issues.
It is very stable.
It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.
I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.
The ROI they have given us is tremendous, and they are doing really well in terms of product, scalability, and service.
Modernizing the UI further, simplifying packaging and licensing clarity, enhancing the executive reporting and risk dashboard, and expanding broader cloud-native integration would be beneficial improvements.
There is one issue regarding local data storage, as they do not have that capability, and we are storing the data in another foreign country, which is against the law.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.
A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.
This system allows us to pay only for what we use, saving a lot of money, so I give it a ten out of ten as it is both a money and time saver for the organization.
Barracuda service is customizable but external references note that licensing and cost planning can become complex.
While it may not be the cheapest solution available, we believe the security, ease of management, and operational benefits provide good value for the investment.
It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.
It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.
I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.
The centralized dashboard is helping us streamline visibility across our admin panels and provides site-to-site visibility deployed directly to our AWS environment, securing VPC traffic and ensuring the firewall is in place.
One of the strongest points is the speed of deployment, which features a three-step deployment wizard, pre-built templates, and quick onboarding, making it suitable for teams that want protection fast without complex infrastructure setup.
I particularly appreciate its ability to automatically detect and block common web attacks such as SQL injection, XSS, and bot-based threats without requiring manual intervention.
Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.
It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.
The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) | 2.0% |
| Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service | 1.0% |
| Other | 97.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 54 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service streamlines cloud security with features like automatic updates, real-time detection, and bot protection. It enhances AWS environments with simplified management and threat intelligence.
Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service provides robust application security, leveraging automatic security updates and real-time attack detection to defend against threats. Its centralized dashboard offers an intuitive management experience, complemented by automated policies. Real-time threat intelligence, application control, and VPN support contribute to its security efficacy. Its capabilities to detect and prevent DDoS, application, and unknown OS attacks ensure comprehensive protection. Although licensing complexity, high costs, stability concerns, and regional compliance issues pose challenges, it effectively secures websites and email systems against malware, phishing, and ransomware, and simplifies cloud migration.
What are the key features of Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service?In industries like e-commerce and finance, Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is implemented for its effectiveness in securing cloud-based applications while reducing the need for on-premises equipment. Its strength in protecting both websites and email systems makes it a preferred choice for businesses migrating to cloud solutions.
Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.
Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.
What are the main features of Check Point WAF?Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.