Azure Front Door vs Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service comparison

Microsoft and Barracuda Networks are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Microsoft is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.9, while Barracuda Networks is ranked #33 with an average rating of 6.0. Microsoft holds a 4.5% mindshare in WAF, compared to Barracuda Networks’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Barracuda Networks users who would recommend it.

Azure Front Door

Read 15 Azure Front Door reviews

3,307 Views
1,669 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service

Read 5 Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service reviews

481 Views
299 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Azure Front Door

Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service and Azure Front Door compete in cloud-based security and application delivery. Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service seems advantageous in pricing and ease of deployment, while Azure Front Door stands out with feature-rich integration and scalability.

Features: Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service offers comprehensive threat protection, including DDoS and bot mitigation, and a reliable application firewall. Azure Front Door provides global load balancing, SSL offloading, and excellent scalability options through integration with other Azure services.

Room for Improvement: Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service could enhance its integration capabilities and expand feature sets for advanced users. Azure Front Door might improve its ease of deployment and reduce the learning curve. Both services could benefit from more straightforward configuration processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is known for easy deployment and robust customer support, suited for fast setups. Azure Front Door provides extensive documentation and support, though it might require more time to get familiar due to its comprehensive features.

Pricing and ROI: Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service offers competitive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious customers with good ROI. Azure Front Door might be more costly, justifying its price through integrated services and long-term performance and value.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Front Door vs. Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Front Door vs. Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Front Door

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (2nd), Microsoft Security Suite (18th)

Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

33rd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Azure Front Door is 4.5%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

SayedAbdelrhman

Cloud Solution Architect at MentorMate

Provide bot protection and has proficient documentation

During our discussion with the internal Microsoft team about assessing our environment, they confirmed that we have sufficient security measures, especially regarding edge protection. Internally, we believe we are now certified. In the future, we could consider adding layer four protection from the firewall. Front Door combines CDN and WAF protection, so further enhancing its features could benefit both the customer and us. We monitor the number of users attempting to access our IP or DNS servers. When designing the system, we initially needed to ensure our environment was protected with a WAF. However, WAF is currently too costly for us, so we created private links and connected them to Front Door. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Hadar Eshel

Co-Founder and CEO at Cloudway

Easy to install platform with valuable policy management features

We use the product for securing email systems, protecting websites, and safeguarding web-based applications and portals One significant area for improvement in Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service lies in its market positioning and pricing strategy. Additionally, it could operate in a local data center.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Rules Engine is a valuable feature."

"I am impressed with the tool's integrations."

"I find the technical support excellent, and I rate it a ten."

"It inspects the traffic at the network level before it comes into Azure. We can do SSL offloading, and it can detect abnormalities before the traffic comes into the application. It can be used globally and is easy to set up. It is also quite stable and scalable."

"The web application firewall is a great feature."

"You can assign as many web application firewall policies as you want to the same instance of Front Door."

"The most valuable feature is that I can have CDN and load-balancing capabilities in a single service instead of managing two separate tools."

"I particularly appreciate its load-balancing capabilities as it allows us to manage multiple instances and support a global presence effectively."

More Azure Front Door pros

"I like its ability to identify known attacks, including DDOS attacks. It's valuable because software must be able to stop known attacks. Application attacks are evolving all the time. When it comes to software-as-a-service, we need to have software that knows about all the latest attacks. It should also protect against major unknown attacks."

"The solution can be used for threat prevention or as a cloud-to-cloud backup system"

"It provides an ease of policy management."

"The product's bot protection feature is valuable for our company."

"The most valuable features of the solution are it is plug and play, has automated policies, a simple configuration, and is easy to create rules."

Cons

"We should be able to use Front Door defenders with multiple cloud vendors. Currently, they can be used only with the Azure cloud. Azure Front Door should also be able to do global load balancing and provide internal front door services. Microsoft should clearly define what Traffic Manager, Application Gateway, and Azure Front Door products do. These are similar products, and people get confused between these products."

"The user interface needs improvement as it is difficult to create the mapping to link the problem with your private address sources."

"The product's features are limited compared to Cloudflare. The tool also doesn't work well in a hybrid environment. I would like to see a way to add personalized APIs in the system."

"The product needs to improve its latency."

"I dislike the URL set parameters."

"There could be improvements regarding its pricing for large-scale projects."

"There's a limitation on the amount of global rules we can add."

"In the tool, there needs to be a good amount of monitoring in the area of health probes to capture in front of what is happening."

More Azure Front Door cons

"It's a very specific solution that is only requested for a customer's web code or their global IT policy."

"The solution can improve by bundling Security Operation Center (SOC) with the WAF-as-a-Service, it would provide a lot more value to customers."

"We found it a bit slow when accessing it through the web browser. The URL also exposed the user name and the hashed password. When I log into my Barracuda WAF user portal, I could see the username and the hashed password on the URL itself. So, it is not very secure, and it is important to take that off."

"The stability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"One significant area for improvement in Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service lies in its market positioning and pricing strategy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Considering the standard licensing of the tool, even though we have not checked the billing as of now, it might not be very costly."

"The solution is a bit expensive."

"The pricing of the solution is good."

"It is on a pay-as-you-go basis."

"The transition to the premium tier has led to increased costs, making it more expensive than the classic tier."

"The product is expensive."

"The product is expensive but it offers flexible pricing. It could be affordable."

"It's very difficult for me to give an estimate of the cost. All I know is that we sell the box itself as a service."

"I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high. There are no additional costs to be paid apart from the standard licensing fees attached to the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

20%

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?

We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Front Door?

Rules Engine is a valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Front Door?

I am not sure about the pricing but believe Azure Front Door might require a higher cost due to its entry point nature.

See all answers

What do you like most about Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service?

It provides an ease of policy management.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service?

One significant area for improvement in Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service lies in its market positioning and pricing strategy. Additionally, it could operate in a local data center. This limitation hinder...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service?

We use the product for securing email systems, protecting websites, and safeguarding web-based applications and portals.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs Azure Front Door

Compared 18% of the time

Amazon CloudFront vs Azure Front Door

Compared 16% of the time

Akamai vs Azure Front Door

Compared 12% of the time

AWS Global Accelerator vs Azure Front Door

Compared 11% of the time

Imperva Web Application Firewall vs Azure Front Door

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Front Door Competitors

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service

Compared 76% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Web Application Firewall vs Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service

Compared 11% of the time

More Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Front Door

June 2025

Download Azure Front Door product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

June 2025

Download Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service product report

Also Known As

Azure Front-Door

Barracuda WAF as a Service

Overview

Azure Front Door is employed for securing external traffic, global load balancing, integrating web application firewalls, enabling disaster recovery, and enhancing application accessibility.

Organizations leverage Azure Front Door to support data publishing, act as a CDN, and ensure low latency for global users. Clients use it to protect numerous internet-accessible applications, integrate with DNS, and implement custom routes. Favored for caching web content and securely, efficiently distributing traffic to backend services, Azure Front Door offers SSL offloading, traffic inspection, and global scalability. Users value its affordability, ease of implementation, and web application firewall. Azure Front Door provides rich security features, traffic management, and URL rewriting. Load-balancing capabilities enhance performance with additional content security policies and bot protection. Integrations, including with GitOps, along with combined CDN and load-balancing, are also highlighted.

What are the most important features?

SSL Offloading: Reduces the burden on backend services
Traffic Inspection: Enhances security by inspecting incoming traffic
Global Scalability: Ensures performance for users worldwide
Web Application Firewall: Provides in-depth security features
Load Balancing: Distributes traffic to improve performance
URL Rewriting: Customizes URL paths for better navigation
Bot Protection: Shields applications from automated threats
Integrations: Supports technologies like GitOps
Combined CDN and Load-Balancing: Streamlines content delivery and traffic management

What are the benefits or ROI of using this service?

Affordability: Provides cost-effective solutions for web traffic management
Ease of Implementation: Streamlines setup processes for quick deployment
Enhanced Security: Offers robust protection for web applications
Improved Performance: Optimizes traffic distribution and latency
Scalability: Supports growing application demands with global reach

Azure Front Door finds usage across multiple industries due to its versatile applications. E-commerce companies benefit from improved global accessibility and speed, while financial institutions leverage its security features for protecting sensitive data. Media and entertainment sectors use its CDN capabilities for seamless content delivery, and healthcare providers rely on its compliance and protection standards for patient data security.

Microsoft

Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service is a comprehensive solution designed to provide application security, DDoS protection, SSL authentication, protocol support, and application delivery. It is a plug-and-play solution with automated policies, simple configuration, and easy rule creation.

The solution can be used for threat prevention or as a cloud-to-cloud backup system based on email protection with cloud security. It is also a web application firewall and covers major protection and threat management functions. With Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service, customers can ensure the security of their web code and comply with global IT policies.

Barracuda Networks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Salvation Army

Buyer's Guide

Azure Front Door vs. Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service

June 2025

Free Report: Azure Front Door vs. Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Front Door vs. Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Front Door vs. Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.