No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Cost Explorer vs IBM Turbonomic comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Cost Explorer
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
15th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Financial Data Analysis Platforms (3rd)
IBM Turbonomic
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
205
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (3rd), Cloud Management (4th), Virtualization Management Tools (3rd), IT Financial Management (1st), IT Operations Analytics (8th), Cloud Analytics (1st), AIOps (17th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of AWS Cost Explorer is 2.9%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Turbonomic is 5.4%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Cost Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM Turbonomic5.4%
AWS Cost Explorer2.9%
Other91.7%
Cloud Cost Management
 

Featured Reviews

Chukwudi Uzoma - PeerSpot reviewer
Head Of IT, Infrastructure at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Improved cost visibility has supported data‑driven savings and faster anomaly investigations
The best features AWS Cost Explorer offers include cost and usage trend analysis, the cost forecasting feature, service-level spending breakdowns, the tags and cost allocation analysis, Savings Plans recommendations, Reserved Instances recommendations, and reservation coverage and utilization reports. I also appreciate being able to filter by account, service, region, tag, and cost category. The features that stand out for my workflow include cost and usage trend analysis, which I probably could not imagine working without because it really helps me follow the evolution of the different costs per account, per month over the entire year to be able to give useful information to management for possible commitment purposes and decision-making. Without this service or feature, it would be difficult. I particularly appreciate how quickly I can move from a high-level cost view to detailed analysis without requiring complex queries or external reporting tools. AWS Cost Explorer has positively impacted my organization by improving our cost visibility, enabling better financial accountability, and supporting data-driven optimization decisions. It also facilitates collaboration between the teams—engineering, finance, procurement, and leadership—by providing a common source of truth for cloud spending. While I cannot disclose confidential figures, AWS Cost Explorer has helped support cloud optimization initiatives that resulted in great annual savings opportunities through Savings Plans, Reserved Instances, and rightsizing initiatives. It has also reduced the time required to investigate our cost anomalies from hours to minutes. When I mention reduced investigation time from hours to minutes, the typical workflow before involved a team being lost, trying to reconcile where these costs have come from, what accounts have been involved, which services, and jumping from one account to another. For example, if leadership were to ask why AWS cost increased by twenty percent compared to the previous month, this investigation could take hours because you would need to review invoices, analyze usage reports, check which services had increased consumption, identify the affected accounts, and then contact engineering teams for context. However, AWS Cost Explorer streamlined this process significantly because it provides immediate visibility into cost trends. I can quickly compare the time periods, filter by service, account, region, tag, and cost category, and identify the primary drivers of the increase within minutes.
reviewer1446966 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Engineer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
The solution reduced our operational expenditures and is able to identify points before we even noticed them
The management interface seems to be designed for high-resolution screens. Somebody with a smaller-resolution screen might not like the web interface. I run a 4K monitor on it, so everything fits on the screen. With a lower resolution like 1080, you need to scroll a lot. Everything is in smaller windows. It doesn't seem to be designed for smaller screens. When I change the resolution to 1080, I only see half of what I would on my big 4K monitor. It would be annoying to have to scroll to see the flow chart. They have a flow chart that goes top to bottom like a tree. On a lower resolution, it might be nice if that scrolls horizontally because it's long, narrow, and tall. It's only three icons wide, but it's 15 icons tall. I think it would be helpful to have the ability to change that for a smaller screen and customize the widget.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"AWS Cost Explorer has positively impacted my organization by improving our cost visibility, enabling better financial accountability, and supporting data-driven optimization decisions."
"I find the forecasting feature particularly valuable as it helps predict future expenses."
"AWS Cost Explorer is beneficial because you can access a simple interface where you can get an overview of all the costs you have in the cloud environment."
"In our organization, optimizing application performance is a continuous process that is beyond human scale. We would not be able to do the number of actions that Turbonomic takes on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis. It is humanly impossible with the little micro adjustments that it can make. That is a huge differentiator. If you just figure each action could take anywhere very conservatively from five to 10 minutes to act upon, then you multiply that out by thousands of actions every month, it is easily something where you could say, "I am saving a couple of FTEs.""
"The system automatically sizes and moves resources based on the needs of the applications."
"The software is very cost effective, especially in comparison to other products."
"Customer Service: Very good. Very quick response times. Technical Support: Very good. Knowledgeable staff."
"Helped to “right size” productions server environment. We now can do more with less."
"The automation in Turbonomic is priceless, and all the dashboards, native or custom build, give a complete virtual and physical hardware performance view."
"Customer Service: Excellent. My rep always stays in touch and keeps us in the loop when changes are coming."
"I've found that the automation of moving VMs for resource allocation is second to none."
 

Cons

"The reason I would not give it a ten is that advanced analytics, forecasting, and reporting often require additional services, as I mentioned earlier, such as the CUR, Athena, Quicksight, or third-party FinOps platforms."
"One disadvantage of AWS Cost Explorer is that you cannot filter too much. You cannot filter data by more than one variable."
"While there is always room for improvement, any needs for enhancement depend on specific requirements at the time. Currently, I cannot pinpoint any specific improvements needed."
"Built-in, context-sensitive 'Help' would be useful at times, instead of having to search through the User Guide or Community for assistance - or just for those times when you're curious about the function of a particular option/feature."
"I do not like Turbonomic's new licensing model. The previous model was pretty straightforward, whereas the new model incorporates what most of the vendors are doing now with cores and utilization. Our pricing under the new model will go up quite a bit. Before, it was pretty straightforward, easy to understand, and reasonable."
"There are a lot of preconfigured reports that can be ran within Turbonomics for some of the more common information needed. To do a custom report you have to create a SQL query string and add it as a report to gather custom information."
"Alert emails could be more comprehensive."
"It would be helpful to have the option to display the target(s) by their host name instead of their IP address."
"They could add a few more reports. They could also be a bit more granular. While they have reports, sometimes it is hard to figure out what you are looking for just by looking at the date."
"I think the web interface could be better, I know they are working on a new one so I'm looking forward to seeing the final product when its released."
"Had 1 issue during a service pack that required me to redeploy and lose all previous history."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I don't know the current prices, but I like how the licensing is based on the number of instances instead of sockets, clusters, or cores. We have some VMs that are so heavy I can only fit four on one server. It's not cost-effective if we have to pay more for those. When I move around a VM SQL box with 30 cores and a half-terabyte of RAM, I'm not paying for an entire socket and cores where people assume you have at least 10 or 20 VMs on that socket for that pricing."
"In the last year, Turbonomic has reduced our cloud costs by $94,000."
"Everybody tells me the pricing is high. But the ROIs are great."
"It is an endpoint type license, which is fine. It is not overly expensive."
"IBM Turbonomic is an investment that we believe will deliver positive returns."
"The pricing is in line with the other solutions that we have. It's not a bargain software, nor is it overly expensive."
"I have not seen Turbonomic's new pricing since IBM purchased it. When we were looking at it in my previous company before IBM's purchase, it was compatible with other tools."
"I know there have been some issues with the billing, when the numbers were first proposed, as to how much we would save. There was a huge miscommunication on our part. Turbonomic was led to believe that we could optimize our AWS footprint, because we didn't know we couldn't. So, we were promised savings of $750,000. Then, when we came to implement Turbonomic, the developers in AWS said, "Absolutely not. You're not putting that in our environment. We can't scale down anything because they coded it." Our AWS environment is a legacy environment. It has all these old applications, where all the developers who have made it are no longer with the company. Those applications generate a ton of money for us. So, if one breaks, we are really in trouble and they didn't want to have to deal with an environment that was changing and couldn't be supported. That number went from $750,000 to about $450,000. However, that wasn't Turbonomic's fault."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
25%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Insurance Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business42
Midsize Enterprise57
Large Enterprise147
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with AWS Cost Explorer?
When discussing how AWS Cost Explorer can be improved, I would suggest that if they could incorporate more advanced forecasting capabilities, maybe stronger AI-driven optimization recommendations—e...
What is your primary use case for AWS Cost Explorer?
My primary use case for AWS Cost Explorer is cost visibility and optimization, and I use it to understand where cloud spend is occurring, identify spending trends, analyze cost drivers, evaluate co...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Reserved Instance Reporting
Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Cost Explorer vs. IBM Turbonomic and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.