Top 10 AWS Cost Explorer Alternatives

Name: AWS Cost Explorer
Brand: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Rating: 4.5 (2 reviews)

Vendor: Amazon Web Services (AWS)

4.5 out of 5

2 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top AWS Cost Explorer Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to AWS Cost Explorer based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include IBM Turbonomic, Cloudability, and VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

AWS Cost Explorer surpasses its competitors by offering intuitive cost management tools, including detailed usage analytics and customizable dashboards, empowering businesses to predict future expenses efficiently and optimize resource allocation effectively for maximum savings.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Amazon Web Services (AWS), and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

IBM Turbonomic

4.4 out of 5

IBM Turbonomic

4.4 out of 5

IBM Turbonomic excels in dynamic workload optimization and automation, suitable for environments needing real-time adjustments. In comparison, AWS Cost Explorer emphasizes cost analysis and budgeting, attracting enterprises prioritizing financial planning and seamless AWS integration.

Download AWS Cost Explorer vs. IBM Turbonomic Report

Pricing

IBM Turbonomic's setup costs are higher compared to AWS Cost Explorer, which offers more cost-effective setup solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Turbonomic's setup costs are higher compared to AWS Cost Explorer, which offers more cost-effective setup solutions.

Cloudability

3.7 out of 5

Cloudability

3.7 out of 5

Cloudability excels with advanced analytics and multi-cloud support, offering a broad approach to cost management. In comparison, AWS Cost Explorer provides seamless AWS integration, focusing on cost-effective, AWS-centric operations, ideal for users prioritizing deep AWS service alignment.

Download AWS Cost Explorer vs. Cloudability Report

Pricing

Cloudability offers a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas AWS Cost Explorer requires more initial investment for setup. These differences highlight distinct approaches to cost management tools.

View comparison

Pricing

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

4.2 out of 5

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

4.2 out of 5

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth excels in pricing and support across multi-cloud setups. In comparison, AWS Cost Explorer offers feature-rich cost tracking and forecasting specifically for AWS services. A tech buyer might choose CloudHealth for affordability or Cost Explorer for detailed AWS cost insights.

Download AWS Cost Explorer vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report

Pricing

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth typically has a higher setup cost than AWS Cost Explorer, offering broader features for complex infrastructures. In contrast, AWS Cost Explorer provides a more economical solution for straightforward budgeting needs.

View comparison

Pricing

Apptio Costing

1 out of 5

Apptio Costing

1 out of 5

AWS Cost Explorer appeals to AWS users with its seamless integration and cost-effective insights. In comparison, Apptio Costing attracts enterprises with comprehensive multi-cloud capabilities and tailored support. AWS is ideal for AWS environments, while Apptio offers value for complex multi-cloud management.

Pricing

AWS Cost Explorer offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Apptio Costing involves a more complex and potentially higher-cost setup.

View comparison

Pricing

AWS Cost Explorer offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, whereas Apptio Costing involves a more complex and potentially higher-cost setup.

Azure Cost Management

4.0 out of 5

Azure Cost Management

4.0 out of 5

Azure Cost Management is notable for pricing options catering to business sizes. In comparison, AWS Cost Explorer impresses with its comprehensive features, supporting those prioritizing detailed analytics. Azure offers competitive pricing, while AWS provides deeper financial insights, attracting organizations seeking advanced monitoring capabilities.

Download AWS Cost Explorer vs. Azure Cost Management Report

Pricing

Azure Cost Management features a straightforward setup with minimal upfront expenses, while AWS Cost Explorer requires more initial investment for configuration, highlighting a significant cost difference in setup processes between these two cloud cost management tools.

View comparison

Pricing

CloudCheckr

3.9 out of 5

CloudCheckr

3.9 out of 5

CloudCheckr offers advanced analytics and compliance tools for managing multi-cloud environments. In comparison, AWS Cost Explorer provides seamless integration with AWS services, making it ideal for AWS-centric operations. CloudCheckr suits diverse cloud needs, while AWS Cost Explorer excels at optimizing AWS-specific resources.

Download AWS Cost Explorer vs. CloudCheckr Report

Pricing

CloudCheckr requires a moderate setup cost, whereas AWS Cost Explorer offers a simpler and cost-effective setup. These differences highlight unique priorities in initial investments.

View comparison

Pricing

CloudCheckr requires a moderate setup cost, whereas AWS Cost Explorer offers a simpler and cost-effective setup. These differences highlight unique priorities in initial investments.

Apptio One

4.0 out of 5

Apptio One

4.0 out of 5

Apptio One excels in multi-cloud financial management with detailed cost transparency and financial reporting capabilities. In comparison, AWS Cost Explorer provides seamless integration for AWS environments, focusing on AWS-specific cost analysis and optimization. Tech buyers choose based on multi-cloud integration needs or AWS-specific insights.

Download AWS Cost Explorer vs. Apptio One Report

Pricing

Apptio One involves high setup costs, while AWS Cost Explorer offers a more cost-effective initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Apptio One involves high setup costs, while AWS Cost Explorer offers a more cost-effective initial setup.

Pump.co

1 out of 5

Pump.co

1 out of 5

AWS Cost Explorer offers integration within AWS with useful budgeting tools. In comparison, Pump.co provides customizable features for hybrid cloud setups. AWS's affordability appeals to AWS users, whereas Pump.co justifies its premium with advanced cross-cloud analytics for diverse environments.

Pricing

AWS Cost Explorer has a minimal setup cost, offering straightforward budget tracking, while Pump.co incurs a higher setup cost, focusing on customizable and advanced billing features.

View comparison

Pricing

AWS Cost Explorer has a minimal setup cost, offering straightforward budget tracking, while Pump.co incurs a higher setup cost, focusing on customizable and advanced billing features.

Google Cloud Billing

4.2 out of 5

Google Cloud Billing

4.2 out of 5

Google Cloud Billing emphasizes simplicity with its easy-to-understand pricing reports and straightforward setup. In comparison, AWS Cost Explorer integrates deeply within the AWS ecosystem, offering detailed cost analysis and forecasting for intricate financial planning and potential long-term savings in complex environments.

Download AWS Cost Explorer vs. Google Cloud Billing Report

Pricing

Google Cloud Billing offers a lower setup cost, making it a more budget-friendly option, while AWS Cost Explorer tends to have higher initial expenses, reflecting its comprehensive analytics features.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Cloud Cost Management

Financial Data Analysis Platforms

Cloud Migration