VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Reviews

I have been working with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth for the last two years. My main use case requires logging into the CloudHealth dashboard to review cloud spending, budget status, check cost anomaly alerts, review right-sizing recommendations, identify ideal or unused resources, and validate governance and tagging compliance. I generate or review scheduled reports and coordinate with the cloud and application teams to implement optimized recommendations, which is the day-to-day workflow followed by our cloud operations team and infrastructure instance team.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has positively impacted our organization by providing centralized visibility into cloud costs and resource utilization across multiple cloud environments. It helps identify under-utilized and ideal resources which we have not been using in the last two to three months, reducing unnecessary cloud spending. The right-sizing recommendations enable me to optimize computer resources without affecting application performance. Budget forecasting and cost anomaly alerts allow me to take proactive actions for expected planned budgets.

Automated dashboards and scheduled reports reduce manual effort required for cloud cost analysis and management reporting. Governance policies improve tagging compliance and increase accountability across teams, strengthening collaboration between infrastructure, finance, and cloud operations by providing a single source of cloud cost information. Overall, it improves operational efficiency, enhances cloud governance, and supports better financial decision-making for our organization.

Our organization achieves approximately twenty to thirty percent cloud cost optimization through right-sizing recommendations, ideal resource cleanup, and improved resource utilization. Automated cost monitoring and budget alerts help prevent unnecessary cloud spending, leading to improved financial governance. The centralized dashboard eliminates the need for manual reviews across multiple cloud portals, reducing operational effort, and automatic reporting saves approximately thirty to forty percent of the time spent on cloud cost analysis and executive reporting. These metrics allow the infrastructure team to focus more on automation initiatives instead of manual monitoring and reporting tasks. Earlier, I spent a lot of time generating reports from our infrastructure tools like resource utilization through BI tools. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has helped me achieve twenty to thirty percent cloud cost optimization and save thirty to forty percent of the time.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's multi-cloud cost management is a standout because it provides a single dashboard to monitor cloud spending across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Instead of logging into multiple cloud platforms or portals, I can analyze costs, trends, and resource utilization across platforms, making cloud financial management much more efficient. The right-sizing recommendation feature continuously analyzes CPU, memory, and resource utilization to recommend appropriately sized virtual machines. This plays a significant role for me as an infrastructure engineer to help reduce over-provisioning, lower cloud costs, and improve resource efficiency without affecting application performance. Cost anomaly detection is another valuable feature, enabling quick investigation of issues such as accidentally deployed resources or runaway workloads before they significantly impact the monthly budget.

Executive dashboards and reporting, along with governance and policy management, are also crucial features. Governance and policy management help enforce governance policies by identifying missing tags, non-compliant resources, public storage, and other configuration issues, ensuring organizations maintain security and operational standards across different cloud environments like GCP, AWS, and Azure. The customized dashboards provide real-time visibility into cloud costs, reduce optimization opportunities, and show compliance status while scheduling reports to minimize manual efforts for reporting and provide stakeholders with actionable insights.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is a powerful cloud management platform, but there are areas for improvement. I would prefer to see more AI-driven insights that not only recommend optimization but also suggest automated remediation actions. Real-time cost synchronization could be faster, as billing data sometimes has delays. More customized dashboards and report templates would help teams tailor their needs better. Kubernetes cost visibility could be more granular for centralized workloads. Integration with ITSM and automation tools such as ServiceNow and Ansible could be enhanced. Simplifying initial onboarding and policy configuration would also improve the experience for new users. These enhancements would make the platform even more efficient for enterprise cloud operations.

This tool is a mature and relevant cloud management platform with several areas that could be enhanced. I would prefer to see more advanced AI capabilities providing predictive insights and automated remediation for common optimization tasks. Better, faster synchronization of cloud billing and utilization data would enable near real-time cost monitoring. I want more customizable dashboards and executive reports tailored for different stakeholders such as FinOps, infrastructure, and management teams. Improving Kubernetes container cost visibility at the pod level is also necessary.

I would prefer to see stronger AI-driven automation, faster real-time cost updates, more customizable dashboards, deeper Kubernetes cost visibility, enhanced DevOps integrations, and a simpler onboarding process as areas needing improvement. These enhancements would further increase operational efficiency and make the platform more valuable for enterprise cloud management.

I have been working with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth since I joined two years ago.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is stable and reliable in my experience. The dashboards and reporting services are consistently available, and I have not experienced any major platform outages affecting my daily operations. Data synchronization with AWS is generally reliable, although billing information may have slight delays due to some cloud provider update cycles. The platform handles large cloud environments efficiently with minimal performance issues. Scheduled reports, governance policies, and cost optimization recommendations run consistently. Regular product updates introduce new features while maintaining platform stability. Overall, I provide a stability rating of nine out of ten, as it meets my operational requirements with minimal issues.

For scalability, I provide a rating of nine point five out of ten. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is well-suited for medium to large-scale enterprise environments, capable of managing multiple AWS accounts and thousands of cloud resources and workloads across different regions from a single dashboard. As our cloud infrastructure grows, onboarding additional AWS accounts and resources is straightforward without requiring major architectural changes. The platform continues to provide consistent performance, reporting, and governance as the environment scales. It also supports role-based access control, allowing different business units and teams to manage their own cloud resources securely. Overall, I rate scalability at nine point five out of ten.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth provides reliable enterprise-level customer support through the Broadcom support organization. In my experience, the support team has been responsive while handling product configuration, integration, and technical issues. The engineers are knowledgeable and provide practical guidance for resolving cloud management and governance-related problems. The platform also has a comprehensive knowledge base, documentation, and community resources that help resolve common issues quickly. I rate the support quality as nine out of ten. Faster response times for complex issues would further improve the experience.

Before choosing VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, I understand that the organization evaluated other options, specifically Flexera One. The comparison was based on multi-cloud support and cost optimization features as it was being used in other teams. The organization chose VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth for its centralized visibility, governance, and scalability as well as the ease of integration, while other native tools lacked these central management capabilities.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is deployed as a SaaS-based cloud management platform in my organization. I integrate AWS and Azure cloud environments using IAM roles for AWS and service principals for Azure with read-only permissions, ensuring secure API-based access without installing any agents. After onboarding the cloud accounts, the platform automatically synchronizes with cloud inventory, billing, utilization, and tagging information. I then configure governance policies, budget and cost allocation rules, and alert notifications based on organizational standards. Custom dashboards and scheduled reports are created for the infrastructure, FinOps, and management teams.

The deployment process is straightforward and does not impact production workloads because it is agentless. Once configured, CloudHealth serves as my centralized platform for cloud cost optimization, governance, and operational reporting.

I purchase VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth through an authorized VMware Broadcom partner, acting as a reseller.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reduces cloud cost by approximately twenty to thirty percent through right-sizing recommendations, identifying ideal resources, and improving resource utilization. I achieved savings by removing unused EBS volumes, old snapshots, ideal load balancers, and oversized EC2 instances. These alerts help reduce and detect unexpected spending early, preventing unnecessary monthly expenses. Budget forecasting has improved financial planning and reduced cost overruns. Overall, the platform delivers measurable cost savings while enhancing governance and operational efficiency. CloudHealth consistently identifies optimization opportunities, resulting in an estimated twenty to thirty percent reduction in cloud infrastructure costs.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth follows a subscription-based SaaS licensing model, and pricing is typically based on the organization's cloud spend of the resources being managed. In my opinion, the pricing is suitable for medium and large enterprises operating in multi-cloud environments that require advanced financial operations and governance capabilities. Although the initial licensing and cost may seem higher than native cloud tools, the savings achieved through cost optimization and resource right-sizing can provide a strong return on investment. This platform reduces manual effort through centralized reporting and automation, adding operational value. However, for smaller organizations with limited cloud infrastructure, the pricing may be relatively expensive. Overall, the licensing justifies the platform's comprehensive features and scalability for enterprise-level cloud management capabilities, making it a good value for organizations focused on long-term cloud cost optimization and governance.

My advice is to clearly define cloud cost management and governance objectives before implementing VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. This ensures that your AWS environment follows a consistent tagging strategy, as accurate tags are essential for meaningful cost allocation and reporting. Start by onboarding a few cloud accounts and validating dashboards, policies, optimization, and recommendations before expanding across the organization. Involve the infrastructure, cloud operations, security, and finance operations teams early in the deployment to maximize the platform's value. Regularly review right-sizing recommendations, ideal resources, and budget alerts, rather than treating the tool as just a reporting solution. For organizations with multiple AWS accounts and significant cloud spending, VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth delivers excellent visibility and governance as a long-term cost optimization tool.

I provide an overall review rating of nine out of ten for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is used primarily to provide users with a seamless working environment without losing connectivity by offering a solution that virtualizes their computing environment. It is used for cloud and virtualization computing, allowing multiple virtual machines based on different servers, with each acting as an independent machine with its own operating system. It consolidates hardware and helps in reducing IT costs.

Most people are going for a SaaS solution with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, but in some cases, such as one petroleum institution, they had regulatory binding that prevented them from deploying their data on SaaS, so they created the entire setup on-premises. It depends on the client itself and the requirement. If it is a banking institution, most of them are now on SaaS and don't have a problem. Very few insist on keeping it on-premises because data is normally secure whether it is hosted here or there.

Customers do utilize a security and compliance framework with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth because larger institutions won't move forward without it. They choose VMware to ensure a tested and foolproof secure environment. They comply with regulatory standards that go along with it, such as VMware Cloud Foundation, which is a significant product with trust policies and all, making it quite good.

The CloudHealth Unified Dashboard helps streamline cloud management practices by allowing the IT team to manage the environment effectively. It shows if updates are done, whether there is downtime, or if there is a delay, indicating the reason for it. Dashboards are essential; without them, you are sitting in a mirage, not knowing what is happening. With the dashboard, you can quickly identify issues, such as red points and different types of curves indicating problems. This allows us to act on the problem at the very initial stage rather than waiting for the entire system to stop.

The weak points of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth are that while the product is quite capable, cost can be an issue at times. The learning curve is steep because people like to take their own time to understand and roll out things, which creates an overhead in getting people to understand the system. There are also bottlenecks within operations where we face challenges that can lead to delays in implementation.

I have been familiar with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth for almost two years, while there were people who have been using it for definitely six, seven years or more.

Technical support from VMware, or better to say Broadcom, is usually quick and prompt. I don't encounter significant issues since they provide 24/7 support based on the SLA with the client, ensuring the response times are matched accordingly. If the agreement is for four hours, eight hours, or the next business day, responses usually come. We don't typically face situations where institutions are halted from working. Broadcom often comes up with quick rollbacks or informs us if something requires a patch or updates, and usually problems won't happen until instigated by local issues. If local engineers cannot solve the problem, they log a case for assistance from Broadcom or Omnica.

From my side, we needed only a team of three people to deploy VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth in such a large banking environment facing around 100 different departments. The rollout was similar; they had different clusters in the bank, and within those clusters, there were different branches and different zones. We started doing one by one, and we completed all of them. The first one was difficult, and then we began training the users with a train the trainer type of concept. We trained the key members of the team to help us out. There was a project management team from our side and a project management team on the other side working together. We had a steering committee and standard meetings, so it went fine.

This project initially started with a 16-week timeframe, but it ended up taking nine months to complete. The initial four months were dedicated to discussions and getting approval. We had only planned 15 days for UAT, but it took two months to complete. There was significant delay in that one. They wanted to close the project and quickly roll it out, so we had an urgency to finish things faster. Now that the solution is live, they have customized reports, dashboards, and other things, matching the regulatory bank's reporting requirements. We are trying to align the system's attributes with the required reports from the State Bank. It was time-consuming, but eventually, we were successful in completing the project with a certain delay.

There are different departments that get involved in the requirements for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, and as we go for the implementation, we have to seek permissions from them. We have to get some ports opened up for accessibility. However, SaaS is an elegant solution because it is available and always updated. On-premises requires newer updates to be installed manually. SaaS is always a better solution; newer versions or new insights or new features come in automatically. You don't have to wait for a newer version for getting the new things. Most institutions are now going for SaaS, and it is faster and less difficult to implement. You just roll it out and do configurations, and that's it. Very few customizations are done on SaaS. If you go on-premises and people are old school, they will go for a lot of customization, new screens, additional forms, and additional reports. That will clutter a lot of things, and getting newer upgrades becomes a problem since it won't work until you port everything to the new version. Things get delayed, so SaaS is much easier. The rollout is easier if you have a large institution base; for example, we were doing an implementation of an ITSM software for a bank with 33,000 users. We went with SaaS and it went perfectly.

Policy-driven management is part of the implementation of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. The audit and security team will not let you move forward until it conforms to both their requirements and compliance.

I measure the effectiveness of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth resource optimization using various metrics, including the framework where the entire VMware Cloud Foundation and VMware vSphere Foundation are working. Both platforms have interoperability metrics which conform to the standard requirements and suggested guidelines from VMware and Broadcom, and we follow the same.

I have given this review a rating of 9 out of 10.

This product was used for financial management in my company because I was working for a FinTech. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's use case is related to financial control and resource governance across multi-cloud environments, including reducing waste, optimizing spend, and driving accountability.

The most valuable features of this solution include the drive for accountability because we can allocate cloud costs back to specific business units or teams through showback and chargeback. Additionally, reduced waste is achieved because we can identify unused or underutilized resources and receive recommendations for resizing instances.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's unified dashboard helps streamline cloud management practices by unifying everything needed in one dashboard, such as metrics, instance workings, machines, and servers. All of this in just one dashboard is very helpful to improve agility and resolve issues, especially for the workloads.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth helps manage compliance risks by preventing threats, stopping attacks, detecting threats, and securing workloads or endpoints where customers will be using the endpoints. The positive impact on my organization is substantial because we can reduce waste, optimize expenses, drive accountability, and secure the budget from unnecessary cloud costs.

I do not see any flaws in VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. Everything is fine for me. The performance is acceptable, and the layout is acceptable. It is very user-friendly, and there is nothing that needs to be improved from my perspective. The pricing of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth could be better, but for the service being provided, I believe the price is fair.

I have been working with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth for four years.

The stability and reliability of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth are good because this solution makes it very easy to optimize costs. All companies want to optimize costs when using cloud solutions. It is easy to get lost on cost when using cloud services because some companies acquire things they do not need and pay for them unnecessarily. With VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, I can help optimize services and identify the pain points where cost reduction is necessary. Regarding accountability, it is also great.

The scalability of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is great because all components are very user-friendly, and the open-source code is also user-friendly. The scalability is good. The backbone of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is scalability; it is very easy to scale. It is very easy to adapt.

I do not often communicate with the technical support of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth because I have never needed to call them.

I have used the official documentation, guides, and manuals for this tool for examples involving installation and customization. Overall, the documentation is good. They have all the acronyms and glossary. It is very interactive, with examples on how you can do this or that, and there are the do's and the don'ts.

Neutral

I did not use a different solution for the same use cases before VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. We were using other kinds of cloud products, but they were very different from VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth.

I did not participate in the initial setup of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth.

I have seen a return on investment with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. My company was very happy using this, and they did not buy another solution, so I believe they have seen benefits using this VMWare solution.

It is difficult for me to share examples of the return on investment I have noticed because this is a management department issue. They do not share those kinds of things with the employees; otherwise, the employees will ask for more money. I do not have those records.

When trying to choose a product for these use cases, I was only looking at VMware because I am used to using VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, and I do not know much about other vendors. I prefer this one.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's analytics in understanding cloud usage trends and expense forecasts is normally more for marketing staff and analyzing production servers in my case, so I am not very experienced on that point.

The metrics used to measure the effectiveness of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's resource optimization features are programmatic because I am a developer, and we do some calculations according to the requirements. With those requirements, we can create a programmatic enablement to calculate the metrics. It is a very complex procedure to explain in a phone call.

Some companies may not be capable of affording this product. I would rate this review a 7.

I have been using VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth for six years.

My main use case for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is to control our cloud environments. We have VMWare in cloud running on AWS and Azure, but also we use it to control our cloud load running in AWS and Azure.

One of the things we do is use VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth to identify all our load running in one single tenant account to check what was the cost of running these loads and then use it to create the accounts for each of these users and transfer the loads to them. We were able to show them the cost that was being used for each of these accounts and now they will be able to have a better view and control of the expenses on the cloud.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is a great tool to understand the cost of the clouds, to have very detailed financial information on the loads running there, how much of the budget is being used, and have a clear overview of what is happening and plan for the future.

The best features VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth offers are cost management and right sizing because one of the main problems on the load in the cloud is that people tend to think that it is like running things on-premises and you can build huge VMs with no consequences. This is a great tool to show the users that it is different and you need to better right-size your loads in the cloud compared to on-premises.

We migrated loads from premises to the cloud where we were having very big VMs. After showing the team running these VMs using VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth that the VMs were consuming a lot of resources, we were able to show them that it was better to reduce the size of the VMs, spread out the load, and use only the capacity that was being required at the specific times.

Having a better control of our cloud loads and having ways to see how to optimize and improve how it is running there and having better governance was critical for our organization's success.

For my personal case, VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth works perfectly. I do not see any urgent or required improvements. Perhaps later on I will see those possibilities, but for the moment, it works for my needs and requirements.

I have been working in my current field for four years.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is stable in my experience.

For us, VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is working really well. It can be scalable as we need it and we did not have any problems so far.

The customer support for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is excellent. We have a dedicated team to support our needs, so in our case, we did not have any problems. I will give the customer support a nine.

We were not using a tool before VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth.

We had a long history of working with VMware, so this was the tool we evaluated and we decided to go with it.

I acquired VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth directly through VMware.

I did not take part in those discussions, so I am not sure about the metrics, but I can say that in my experience, we saved money on using VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, money that would have been spent in the cloud and now we reduce the load and the cost of the clouds. For me it was an improvement for us.

We were not using a tool before VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is a very good product. It helps me to improve the management and the overview of the cloud loads and it fulfills all my needs.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth gives better help and good advice on governance and security topics. I have not used it that much yet, but it will be something I will definitely be testing and going deep into it.

The tests I tried were good enough to be used in a production environment.

I recommend VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. I will tell them to test it if it will be sufficient for their needs, but I definitely recommend it. I would rate this review a nine overall.

My main use case for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is that it helps me to monitor, optimize, govern, and secure multi-cloud environments, such as AWS, Azure, and GCP. It helps organizations control cloud costs, improve resource utilization, enforce governance policies, and maintain security and compliance.

I can give you a quick specific example of how I use VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth in my daily work, as I am managing the Kubernetes cluster and other production environments on my servers. For monitoring those deployments and the clusters and the nodes, I require VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth for monitoring the resources that are running on AWS, Azure, and GCP.

I am using it for monitoring purposes, and that is my primary use case.

The best features that VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth offers include providing me with multi-cloud visibility from a single dashboard. It also provides me with cloud cost optimization and right-sizing recommendations, governance through policies and automated actions. It helps with budgeting, reporting, and provides automation for policy enforcement and remediation. It does provide me with custom dashboards and reporting.

Out of those features, the most valuable for my team has been cloud cost optimization, as CloudHealth identifies underutilized or idle resources and provides right-sizing recommendations, helping organizations reduce unnecessary cloud spending while maintaining application performance.

I would add that the dashboard of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is very good and it helps me in many ways, including monitoring resources and monitoring deployments. The best feature is that it is a single dashboard for all three clouds, so I can see the resources on these three clouds at the same time.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has positively impacted my organization by optimizing cloud costs and helping platform teams make data-driven decisions while ensuring compliance.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth could be improved by providing more AI-driven recommendations for cost optimization, deeper integration with DevOps and GitOps tools, simpler onboarding for new users, and more customizable dashboards for different users.

I would add that deeper integrations with GitOps and GitLab and many other CI/CD workflows would be really helpful in monitoring the workflows and the failures from the dashboard itself.

I have been using VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth for close to four years while working on this platform.

I have not seen a return on investment with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, as it is a monitoring tool.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is that the setup is minimal and simple. I have not been directly responsible for pricing setup in CloudHealth, but I understand it involves configuring cloud cost allocation using the account hierarchies, tags, business groups, budgets, and pricing rules to accurately track and report cloud spend. My experience with AWS, Azure, and GCP billing, resource tagging, and cost optimization helps me learn and work through CloudHealth quickly. Pricing setup is the process of configuring how the cloud costs are calculated and allocated, which includes connecting cloud billing data, defining business groups, mapping resource tags, and setting custom rates if required. I do not handle this pricing and pricing setup personally.

Regarding VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's AI capabilities, it provides governance through policy-based controls, resource tagging, budget enforcement, and automated remediation. From a security perspective, it offers compliance monitoring, security posture visibility, access controls through role-based access control, and continuous monitoring to identify these aspects across the cloud environments.

In terms of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's AI capabilities regarding accuracy and reliability of output, I do not get the actual figures, but it provides an accurate cloud inventory, cost analysis, utilization data, and recommendations based on the telemetry collected from the cloud providers, such as AWS, Azure, and GCP.

I have rated this product with a review rating of 8.5.

My main use case for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth was cost intelligence only. Mainly our application consists of Kubernetes workloads. So, bringing all the cost-related things at one place, we have used VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth for that. And apart from that, we have a very complex infrastructure. So compliance was very important there. This has helped us in setting up all the tagging policies.

Both cost intelligence and governance are the use cases we've used.

The tagging that VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has suggested or given us has helped us in filtering all the team-related costs, which team is consuming how much. Everything inside a single dashboard was helpful and it has also given us valuable suggestions for right-sizing.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has given us the detailed cost visibility of all the infrastructures at one place. The dashboard capability was quite good. The governance and tagging policies it has suggested have also helped us a lot.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth helped us to visualize and present everything to our stakeholders with a dashboard. The dashboard indicated intelligence in our costing and for predicting the future cost of all the teams and the current cost of all teams and workloads are consuming. Everything inside a dashboard has helped us to present very well to our stakeholders.

The cost optimization recommendations are also one of the best features of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth has given us valuable suggestions in cost optimization. With this, we have right-sized many instances, removed many unused EBS volumes, and unused Elastic IPs. In that way, we have cut around 20% of cost.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth can improve by introducing real-time cost visibility and alerting so that we can better act on that. And apart from that, they can also think of giving us more customization in the dashboard part.

These are the only two things I wished for.

I have used VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth for nearly around one year.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is stable.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is scalable.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's customer support is knowledgeable.

This was our only solution.

We were only using the native costing capabilities of AWS.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's pricing defines the capabilities and setup cost was very straightforward and pricing is also very much understandable.

I saved 20% of money.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's governance and security are very good.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is very accurate.

AWS is the cloud provider I use with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is very good for costing visibility and most importantly if you are planning to introduce governance across your complex infrastructure, this is a good tool.

I have rated VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth nine out of 10 because of the needed improvements I suggested that are core capabilities they can work on.

My use case for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is to integrate workloads.

The most beneficial part for me in VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is that it's integrated with the other products.

The policy-driven management, alerts, and reports help to improve operations.

It helps by gaining visibility into a much lower level where you can gain visibility to your infrastructure.

The dashboard helps to streamline cloud management practices, which is a good thing.

Because it aggregates the information that you need in a single place.

They could improve the life cycle.

I have been using it for three years.

I would give it eight or nine points for stability.

I would rate scalability at eight.

Usually, technical support is good, but if I have big problems, then it gets very problematic.

If you have an incident with one of your products that is easily fixable, the level one and level two support are very helpful. However, if there is something bigger or a larger problem with the product, then it goes into a black hole and stays there forever until either you give up.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is very different compared to Red Hat products. However, imagine a product that you can install, such as KVM, for free. It is not the same thing as vSphere, I understand this, but it's free and it's powerful. People who are willing to spend a little bit more money on operations instead of discarding one million euros every year for VMWare products should consider alternatives.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is a very good product, but if you decide to market it at twice the price of the next commercial competitor in an environment that has many open-source solutions, many people can do without those features.

You can go with Red Hat as an alternative.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth works with the Avi Load Balancer and integrates well with containers.

The integration part is the key aspect of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth.

For someone who knows how to correctly administer and operate it, VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is a beneficial thing.

The problem is how the new company decided to package the products and destroy all the old VMWare ecosystem that they had for partners and for all the tools that the partners had. The prices have become high as well.

I don't know what the best features are or much about the analytics features.

We don't measure the effectiveness of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and don't use any metrics.

I cannot think of any problems with VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth right now.

I would prefer to have support split on less critical incidents and higher critical ones.

I would give VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth an eleven for price because it's quite expensive.

My overall rating for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is a seven.

I use VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth to deploy VMs into the VMware environment. It is a tool used by our admin and finance team to work on their products, and as an operation, we maintain those services.

We use VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth as a platform as a service solution in our multi-cloud environment because we host AWS and our VMware cloud. We also have storage solutions that are dependent on it. I have worked in multi-cloud environments and feel that VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is a good option these days.

The finance and admin team would be able to answer specific questions better. We use VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth as a notification tool, and we have a multi-cloud environment with multiple tools around it. For a particular organization and client we work for, they requested to use this tool, which may have something to do with licensing. I feel that this has an edge over other tools.

I think resource utilization and automation are the best features that VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth offers, and these are the best use cases I have seen.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's AI capabilities are good regarding governance and security.

I feel there are still APIs that VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth needs to work on and integrate. I do not see a gap, but I see some lagging when we integrate it with both AWS and Azure. This is just my observation, though it could be something related to environment dependency.

I feel there is still some scope for improvement. I may not know a lot because I use it as a day-to-day tool and do not work too deeply into it.

I have been using VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth on and off for a couple of years now. I cannot state that it has been more than four years.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is stable in my experience.

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's scalability is good.

We have not used VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth's customer support much.

I am not really sure if I have seen a return on investment from using VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. I have not noticed money saved, time saved, or fewer employees needed.

As a consultant and operation team member, we are given the tools that are being purchased by the procurement team.

I am not really sure if I have seen a return on investment from using VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth. I have not noticed money saved, time saved, or fewer employees needed.

I appreciate the GUI interface of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, and it is very user-friendly. Because we on the DevOps team have many tools that we work with, and depending on the client, we get different tools that we must work with on a daily basis, a comparatively easier GUI makes it easier for us to automate tasks and use it in any environment.

We use VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth for health checks. We do have Nagios and other monitoring tools as well, but I think VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth stands out. My overall review rating for VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is nine.

I use the solution daily, multiple hours a day to identify possible savings by analyzing the various displays as well as the policies for possible cost savings for our customers.

CloudHelth has helped our organization with trying to right-size virtual machines based on current utilization and making recommendations for DM proper sizing and possible reservation purchases.

We use dashboards quite heavily, but one of the features that have really stood out is some of the policies we've created to alert us of particular situations.

The export features regarding CSV files and specifically around identifying savings plans have room for improvement, as well as the drill-down features for reservation utilization.

I have been using the solution for ten months.

The stability is great. We have not had any downtime that I am aware of.

The scalability has been excellent.

We have seen a return on investment with the solution.

I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten.

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

We have a multi-tenancy deployment of 30-plus clouds. We have plans to increase the usage in the future.

In order to get the full effect of the solution's capabilities, it needs to be used on a daily basis.

Our primary use case is for chargeback of cloud cost.

The most valuable thing I have found is the cost saving recommendations.

It would be helpful to have a mobile version or a tablet version, especially for people who are outside of the office. We are missing role-based access. The team should be able to see only the cost related to their spending and not the entire organization's spending. So the people who are logging into the application should see only their expenses.

I have been using CloudHealth for the past year.

The stability of CloudHealth is good.

The scalability is currently limited.  They increase the limits in the backend. They have some limitations around what they can group the data based on, and every time we hit those limits, we have to create a support ticket to get it resolved.

Technical support is very good and I am able to receive technical support during my local working hours.

Positive

We had our own in-house data warehousing tool. There was definitely an improvement in implementing CloudHealth. We have been in touch frequently to understand the solution better.

The initial setup was straightforward. It was not difficult and I did not experience any issues.

The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive. The license they provide is a spending based license.

We were looking at Apptio Cloudability however the pricing was the determining factor. Apptio Cloudability has better granular visibility of data that is missing in CloudHealth.

If they are not looking to use role-based access and they are just looking for cloud management, CloudHealth will do the job, but if it is specifically for rule-based access, they should consider other options. I would rate CloudHealth an eight out of ten.