CloudCheckr vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth comparison

Spot and VMware are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Spot is ranked #29 with an average rating of 7.0, while VMware is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. Spot holds a 1.2% mindshare in CM, compared to VMware’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Spot users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of VMware users who would recommend it.

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews

465 Views
224 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Read 9 VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth reviews

997 Views
349 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

VMware Tanzu CloudHealth and CloudCheckr are competing in the cloud management space. VMware Tanzu CloudHealth offers robust customer service and cost management, appealing to cost-conscious users, while CloudCheckr stands out with its comprehensive feature set focusing on security and compliance.

Features: VMware Tanzu CloudHealth includes key features such as cost management and governance, cloud analytics, and resource optimization, particularly in multi-cloud environments. CloudCheckr provides strong cloud security, compliance, and automated best practice checks that enhance the management of cloud resources.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu CloudHealth could enhance its focus on security and compliance, expand its automated best practice checks, and improve scalability in large cloud environments. CloudCheckr can develop its customer service, elaborate further on cost management strategies, and enhance its integration capabilities with various cloud platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu CloudHealth allows smooth integration with existing systems, ensuring comprehensive customer support and facilitating quick deployment. CloudCheckr enables rapid deployment with a significant emphasis on security compliance during setup but does not match VMware in customer service quality.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu CloudHealth is known for competitive setup costs and delivering a strong ROI for users focused on cost efficiency and strategic cloud use. Although CloudCheckr may have higher initial fees, it provides valuable returns with its extensive feature offering, justifying the investment for those prioritizing comprehensive cloud management.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudCheckr vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Management

29th

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed Cloud Services (3rd)

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Ranking in Cloud Management

21st

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudCheckr is 1.2%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth is 2.0%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Peter Ramnath

Associate Director, ITSM & Onboarding at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited

We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of its development on AWS. The majority of our clients are on Microsoft Azure. There are a lot of features and information available for Amazon, but not for Azure. The tool wasn't meeting our expectations. The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited. There's no ability to do scheduled email reports. The report could only be sent to a single email address. The tool was not very usable. We had multiple clients and tasks to work with.

Read full review

Steve Staten

Cloud Advisor Specialist at Converge Technology Solutions Corp

The solution has excellent scalability, great dashboards, and is stable

I use the solution daily, multiple hours a day to identify possible savings by analyzing the various displays as well as the policies for possible cost savings for our customers CloudHelth has helped our organization with trying to right-size virtual machines based on current utilization and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"The solution is mostly stable."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"The solution is good for cloud cost management."

"We are able to create an internal price of the product that we can then sell to clients. We get the cost plan at a good discount and then resell it with a mark up to our enterprise-level clients. This flexibility in pricing is one of the solution's best features."

"The pricing is rather competitive right now."

"The most valuable thing I have found is the cost saving recommendations"

"We use dashboards quite heavily, but one of the features that have really stood out is some of the policies we've created to alert us of particular situations."

"The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds."

"This solution is fast and very easy to understand, even if you are not a technician."

"It's stable. For report presentation, it's been fast."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth pros

Cons

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size."

"The export features regarding CSV files and specifically around identifying savings plans have room for improvement, as well as the drill-down features for reservation utilization."

"It would be helpful to have a mobile version or a tablet version, especially for people who are outside of the office."

"CloudHealth needs to start building out Turbonomics-types of features that help the customers who are using CloudHealth really understand everything down to the server level, the virtual machine level."

"I would like to see better integration from CloudHealth to create easier setup and implementation."

"The performance and accuracy of Cloud Health need to be improved."

"The Perspectives feature could be better."

"The solution doesn't offer the best functionality, unfortunately. Some features just simply aren't on offer. The solution needs to offer more product milestones."

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"There could be flexibility in pricing for the product."

"I give the cost of the solution an eight out of ten."

"CloudHealth has a subscription-based model."

"The licensing fees depend on how big the company is. If you are a larger company then you have a better contract with a better price. The price is different for a small company."

"The pricing is competitive and while other products are good they are considerably more expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

24%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?

The recommendation section is pretty helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

See all answers

What do you like most about CloudHealth?

The product is easy to use in terms of monitoring all the environments. It works for multiple clouds.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudHealth?

There could be flexibility in pricing for the product. They should provide information or tools to tune the cloud resources according to the environment size. It will help us get the right cost. Ad...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudHealth?

I rate VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Flexera Cloud Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 19% of the time

Apptio One vs CloudCheckr

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs CloudCheckr

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 10% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Cloudability vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 21% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 20% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 11% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Compared 8% of the time

More VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

June 2025

Download CloudCheckr product report

Buyer's Guide

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

May 2025

Download VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth product report

Also Known As

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, CloudHealth

Overview

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization.

The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

Spot

VMware Tanzu CloudHealth, formerly known as VMware Aria Cost Powered by CloudHealth, is a specialized cloud management platform tailored for Multi-Cloud Cost Optimization. It offers comprehensive visibility into cloud spending across various providers, enabling users to identify areas for optimization and make informed resource allocation decisions. With features like reserved instance management, resource rightsizing, and automated cost governance policies, it facilitates financial management for optimal cost efficiency. Beyond cost optimization, Tanzu CloudHealth enhances cloud operations through workload optimization and governance automation, catering to multi-cloud environments encompassing public, private, and hybrid clouds. Its primary focus remains on enabling organizations to effectively manage and reduce cloud expenditures while supporting operations across diverse cloud platforms.

VMware

Sample Customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Pinterest, Dow Jones, RhythmOne, Ziff Davis, Acquia, Mentor Graphics, Lookout, Veracode, SwiftKey, Amtrak, Shi, Imgur, SumoLogic, NewsUK, Cloudera, Canvas

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

May 2025

Free Report: CloudCheckr vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudCheckr vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudCheckr vs. VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors and best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.