Polarion ALM Reviews

Polarion ALM impresses users with its traceability, requirements and document management, and comprehensive toolset for various departments. It excels in integration, providing work and requirement tracking alongside helpful planning and management features. Its stability and performance satisfy users, with the strong browser experience and flexibility enhancing functionality. Dashboards boost reporting capabilities, and structured management of requirements and changes proves beneficial, especially for companies in medical and cyber-physical development fields.

• "Polarion ALM is excellent for tracking who is working on what and how many people are involved in a project."
• "Polarion ALM delivers both document views and table views simultaneously and organizes configurations according to norms and standards."
• "It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective."

Polarion ALM's interface and user experience need improvement, facing challenges with slow loading, complex configurations, and outdated tutorials. Integration with third-party tools, including repositories, is cumbersome and requires effort. Planning and task management features are basic. Users require programming knowledge to navigate, and documentation could be updated. High costs and intricate installation add to the complexity. Scalability and collaboration features are lacking, and manual saves impede performance. Pricing and dashboard complexities need addressing.

• "The user interface of Polarion ALM needs improvement as it can experience changes that disrupt workflows, especially during major updates."
• "The system’s technology is not the most current, leading to missing features that are common in web-based applications."
• "I also recently suggested that CMS consider incorporating generative artificial intelligence into the system."