Digital.ai Agility vs Polarion ALM comparison

Digital.ai and Siemens are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Digital.ai is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while Siemens is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. Digital.ai holds a 1.8% mindshare in ALM, compared to Siemens’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of Digital.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Siemens users who would recommend it.

Digital.ai Agility

Read 5 Digital.ai Agility reviews

959 Views
581 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Polarion ALM

Read 22 Polarion ALM reviews

3,837 Views
2,560 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Agility

Polarion ALM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Digital.ai Agility and Polarion ALM are competitors in application lifecycle management. Data comparisons show Polarion ALM offers a more feature-rich experience, making it worthwhile despite higher pricing, whereas Digital.ai Agility is recognized for support and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Digital.ai Agility is recognized for its integration capabilities with various third-party applications and agile development tools. Polarion ALM provides traceability, compliance management, and robust reporting tools, excelling in complex project management with its extensive traceability options.

Room for Improvement: Digital.ai Agility could enhance its feature set to better cater to complex project management and improve documentation and traceability capabilities. Polarion ALM can streamline its deployment process, enhance user-friendliness, and improve its initial setup process to reduce complexity and implementation time for users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital.ai Agility offers rapid deployment with straightforward installation and responsive support. Polarion ALM's extensive features contribute to a more complex deployment process but are complemented by thorough support and comprehensive resources essential for implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Digital.ai Agility is competitively priced with lower upfront costs, yielding favorable ROI in agile-centric projects. Polarion ALM has a higher initial cost, justified by its wide feature set, promising longer-term value for demanding feature requirements. Both products cater to different project needs and financial considerations.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Agility vs. Polarion ALM Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Agility vs. Polarion ALM

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,038 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Agility

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

14th

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

9th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (9th), Value Stream Management Software (5th)

Polarion ALM

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

6th

Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Agility is 1.8%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Polarion ALM is 8.2%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Debbie Brey

Technical Fellow at Boeing

A scalable, full-package solution with a tech support team that bends over backwards to help

There is room for improvement in getting the analytics portion of the solution more integrated with the rest of it. The feature I would like to see is already in their newer licensing structure, and that's the live integration between Agility, Jira and Azure DevOps. That's the piece that I think is really valuable.

Read full review

Dina Bindi

Information and Communication technology at CNH Industrial

Provides traceability and compliance with high flexibility

It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective. However, we don't use DevOps-related features, such as integration with tools like SVN or Git, because we use Azure DevOps. The aspects related to requirements, testing, changes, tasks, and agile methodology are excellent, which is why we've been using it for a long time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With some of the other tools, you have to buy 20 different plugins to get to the same capability that comes with the basic Agility capability."

"Agility is highly flexible. It can do much more than what our client is doing with it. They use it in a defined way. Some at that company have a much broader knowledge of agile and SAFe, but they're given applications and a mandated way to work. We had to work within their parameters and provide an accurate transition so the data would be mapped and pushed through."

"For visualization capabilities, the automation capabilities make it possible to support the different personas. The features and capabilities are excellent and come with excellent support."

"It allows my clients to have one central tool to manage their agile projects."

"It can generate reports showing a burndown chart, burnup chart, and the planned vs actual velocity."

"The initial setup of this solution was straightforward, and there were not too many problems with it."

"Polarion ALM delivers both document views and table views simultaneously and organizes configurations according to norms and standards."

"The features I find the most valuable are requirement tracking and schematics."

"It is a very stable solution."

"Polarion ALM's integration is very good and easy to use."

"It meets with everybody's needs without having to grab plugins."

"It's extremely flexible. Configuring items is straightforward and doesn't require involving the supplier each time. We find the requirement management, test management, documentation, and dashboards very effective."

"The best feature of Polarion ALM to me is its traceability link."

More Polarion ALM pros

Cons

"Improve how to create and track releases. Currently, I have to create child projects."

"In my work as a contractor, it's always frustrating when a client has multiple software applications that don't talk to each other and they all perform the same function. That presents a huge challenge between their IT groups."

"The user interface can be improved by adding Save, Edit, Add, Cancel, and Return buttons to the popup windows that are displayed when you click on a child item."

"The machine learning features are a new capability but could be improved. This is being worked by Digital.ai currently. Multicolor simulation, specifically, could be improved."

"There is room for improvement in getting the analytics portion of the solution more integrated with the rest of it."

"The tool needs to improve its planning. It also needs to add more integrations."

"The ease-of-use could be improved a little."

"Test management lacks an automated process."

"Integration requires a lot of effort. You typically need to work with an implementation partner to get it done. Most connectors available for Polarion ALM are paid. Unlike other vendors offering several standard connectors for free, integrating third-party software with Polarion ALM involves discussing and coordinating with the third-party software providers, which requires effort."

"Technical support needs some improvement."

"The solution needs to improve its user experience and graphics."

"As Polarion ALM is a development-oriented tool, easy support or easy access is provided by default, but if I want to use detailed features, I need to write the script, particularly the VM script, and this is its area for improvement. I want Polarion ALM to have a graphical user interface that doesn't need scripting. In the next release of the tool, I'd like for it to not require scripting and programming because needing to run script language is time-consuming."

"The interface for this solution needs to be made more user-friendly to provide a better user experience."

More Polarion ALM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You get what you pay for. Don't let your development teams dictate what the portfolio management team should use as the main tool."

"Comparing the pricing to other products, I think this solution is in the middle."

"The license model is okay for large companies but would be quite expensive for smaller enterprises."

"Software for medical devices is always expensive."

"You have to pay around 50-60 euros per user."

"Our license for Polarion ALM is yearly. And it's not the cheapest tool that we've looked at. So if we had made our decision purely based on the licensing cost, we wouldn't have selected Polarion."

"It is an expensive product."

"If the pricing would come down and it was more affordable then we wouldn't have to switch."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Insurance Company

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

26%

Computer Software Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Polarion ALM?

It is a very stable solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Polarion ALM?

The user interface of Polarion ALM needs improvement as it can experience changes that disrupt workflows, especially during major updates. Sometimes, database migrations take too long, spanning two...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Polarion ALM?

As a manual tester, I use Polarion ALM ( /products/polarion-alm-reviews ) for our weekly builds validation. These builds are crucial as they eventually lead to final release builds for customers. I...

See all answers

Comparisons

Jira vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 49% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 12% of the time

Jira Align vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Deployment Automation vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 6% of the time

GitLab vs Digital.ai Agility

Compared 6% of the time

More Digital.ai Agility Competitors

Codebeamer vs Polarion ALM

Compared 30% of the time

Jira vs Polarion ALM

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Polarion ALM

Compared 15% of the time

Jama Connect vs Polarion ALM

Compared 8% of the time

PTC Integrity vs Polarion ALM

Compared 6% of the time

More Polarion ALM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Agility

June 2025

Download Digital.ai Agility product report

Buyer's Guide

Polarion ALM

May 2025

Download Polarion ALM product report

Also Known As

VersionOne Lifecycle, VersionOne, CollabNet VersionOne, Digital.ai Continuum

No data available

Overview

Enterprise business agility rests on agile planning that scales and has the flexibility needed to meet the needs of customers and the market. Digital.ai Agility enables organizations to scale up agile from the team level across the product portfolio, improve collaboration and efficiency, and deliver software that provides more value.

Digital.ai

The world’s first 100% browser-based ALM enterprise solution, which enables seamless collaboration across disparate teams, multi-directionally linked work items, full traceability, accelerated productivity and automated proof of compliance.

Siemens

Sample Customers

Siemens Health Services (HS), Cerner Corporation, Aaron's, Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, Kelley Blue Book, AOL, Axway, Tideworks, bwin Interactive Entertainment, AG, Intergraph, Eos Group, PeopleCube, Liquid Machines

Engineering Ingegneria Informatica, IBS AG, Zumtobel Group

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Agility vs. Polarion ALM

May 2025

Free Report: Digital.ai Agility vs. Polarion ALM

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Agility vs. Polarion ALM and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital.ai Agility vs. Polarion ALM report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Enterprise Agile Planning Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.