OpenText Silk Test is a versatile automated testing tool known for its advanced scripting and recording capabilities in Visual Studio. It offers robust test case management, supporting cross-browser testing and seamless integration with Java and C#, providing a stable environment for automation.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Silk Test | 1.9% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 10.1% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 6.8% |
| Other | 81.2% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Functional Testing Tools | May 5, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | May 5, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Silk Test vs Tricentis Tosca | May 5, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Silk Test vs Worksoft Certify | May 5, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Silk Test vs OpenText Functional Testing | May 5, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 4.1 | 10.1% | 96% | 113 interviewsAdd to research |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 4.0 | 6.8% | 87% | 98 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 53 |
OpenText Silk Test supports GUI object recognition and offers a user-friendly interface that facilitates multi-language support. It enhances test design with its object-oriented approach and integrates performance testing tools for precise data-driven tests. Silk Test excels in browser testing and performance testing across web applications, making it a comprehensive choice for regression testing, SAP automation, and performance analysis.
What are the key features of OpenText Silk Test?OpenText Silk Test is widely implemented in industries requiring high precision in data handling and performance analysis. It is commonly used in financial services for month-end regression testing and SAP projects for effective automation. Manual, functional, and performance testing in ERP systems further showcases its diverse application in complex business environments.
OpenText Silk Test was previously known as Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura | 4.0 | I use OpenText Silk Test for manual, functional, and performance testing, particularly for ERP data loading. It supports complete test cycles, accelerates testing, and offers excellent cross-browser capabilities. While beneficial, its pricing could be improved. I've previously used Tricentis. |
| Manager QA at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | As an IT QA manager, I find Silk Test a good, stable, and scalable SAP automation tool with good support and reasonable costs. However, its on-premise initial setup is somewhat complex. |
| Director of Engineering at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees | 3.5 | I found Silk Test's scripting valuable and it was stable for a large test. However, its poor scalability, lack of accessible short-term third-party support, and less robust generated scripts prompted our move to Ranorex. |
| IT Service Delivery Manager Testing and RPA at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I use Silk Test for regression and automation testing, valuing its reduced workload and easy recording. Deployment is fast, though I desire better feature documentation and improved iOS automation. Overall, I recommend this scalable solution with good support. |
| Director Consulting Expert at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use this for performance testing and capacity planning, appreciating its good statistics and detailed reports. Stability and support are strong. However, identifying issues is very manual, and it needs better monitoring. I recommend it, rating it 8/10. |
| IT Programme Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 2.5 | I use this for web automation, valuing Silk4J and good scalability. However, it lacks compatibility, has unclear test management, and needs better API integration and stability. I rate it 5/10, requiring significant improvement. |
| Solutions Architect at MTN | 3.5 | I find Microsoft Silk Test very stable and user-friendly with easy reporting, primarily for network performance testing. However, the pricing is a significant issue, and I'd like better integration in future versions. I rate it 7/10. |
| Director at Traydaht ltd | 3.5 | I value Visual Studio integration and solution stability with good support. However, I find object library integration and some functions clunky, while the user community is small, demanding a learning curve for this powerful tool. |
