Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft .NET Framework Logo

Microsoft .NET Framework Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
4.2 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

What is Microsoft .NET Framework?

Microsoft .NET Framework is a software development framework for building and running applications for Windows, Windows Phone, Windows servers, XML Web services, and Microsoft Azure. The software is made up of two major components: Common Language Runtime (CLR) and the .NET Framework Class Library. The CLR is the execution engine that handles running apps and the Class Library is a library of tested, reusable code that developers can call from their own apps.

Get the Microsoft .NET Framework Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft .NET Framework, IBM BPM, IBM DataPower Gateway and more!
Microsoft .NET Framework is the #2 ranked solution in top Application Infrastructure solutions. PeerSpot users give Microsoft .NET Framework an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. Microsoft .NET Framework is most commonly compared to IBM BPM: Microsoft .NET Framework vs IBM BPM. Microsoft .NET Framework is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 56% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a construction company, accounting for 14% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft .NET Framework
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 866,088 peers since 2012

Featured Microsoft .NET Framework reviews

Read more reviews

Microsoft .NET Framework mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of Microsoft .NET Framework in the Application Infrastructure category stands at 5.9%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Infrastructure Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft .NET Framework5.9%
Apache Web Server11.3%
IBM WebSphere Application Server11.2%
Other71.6%
Application Infrastructure

PeerResearch reports based on Microsoft .NET Framework reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication InfrastructureAug 28, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonMicrosoft .NET Framework vs IISAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonMicrosoft .NET Framework vs IBM WebSphere Application ServerAug 28, 2025Download
ComparisonMicrosoft .NET Framework vs NGINX PlusAug 28, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
IBM BPM3.93.4%90%112 interviewsAdd to research
IBM DataPower Gateway4.24.6%96%29 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Microsoft .NET Framework offers dynamic web content handling, integration with Microsoft technologies, and cross-platform development. It provides extensive libraries and enterprise-grade capabilities. Its customization, ease of use, and support for multiple programming languages make it appealing for developers. Features like ADO.NET, debugging, and middleware enhance performance. Mobile and web application development, along with extensive documentation and support, add further value. Robust integration and a user-friendly environment boost productivity.
  • "Microsoft is better in backward compatibility compared to others."
  • "The structure that can be created is beneficial because once you have the structure, you can be more productive and faster to create and interact with different clouds and implementations."
  • "For us, it is better to remain under the umbrella of Microsoft."

Room for Improvement

Improvements needed for Microsoft .NET Framework include stronger security features, better cross-platform compatibility, and enhanced cloud integration. Many users express a desire for a more user-friendly experience, increased flexibility, and faster performance. Pricing is a concern, with calls for more affordable options. Integration with other tools and more robust technical support are also mentioned. Additionally, there's interest in improved learning resources, AI integration, and better interoperability with platforms like Linux and Mac.
  • "Some cloud features will not run in an old version of Microsoft .NET Framework easily or at all. Running on the cloud is complex."
  • "The significant challenge is that you need an enterprise-level company to maintain software in Microsoft .NET Framework with a proper structure."
  • "They do provide the .NET library, however, for me, the most important capability we want to investigate in the future is the integration with Copilot. This would help speed up the development of the code and also the testing and documentation of the requirement."

ROI

Many entities report a positive ROI from Microsoft .NET Framework. Approximately 30% annually is noted by some, while others mention a 40% ROI when comparing in-house development to outsourcing. The tool adds value and aids in efficient operations, saving significant time. Some express difficulty measuring ROI due to lack of alternative experience, yet overall, the framework is seen as worth the money. Companies prioritize it within their technology stack.

Pricing

Microsoft .NET Framework offers a mix of free and paid options. The framework itself is free, but enterprise versions and associated tools like Visual Studio may incur significant costs, with prices reaching up to $1,000 per user. While some elements are open source, hosting and additional licensing can be expensive. Visual Studio's Community Edition is free, but professional versions require payment. Microsoft provides cost-effective solutions for corporate users, yet some consider the expenses high compared to open-source alternatives.
  • "Microsoft .NET Framework is very cost-effective for corporate users."
  • "It's an expensive solution"
  • "The product is not expensive."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations use Microsoft .NET Framework primarily for building custom business applications, developing web and mobile solutions, and creating enterprise-grade systems. It's popular for point-of-sale, finance, and integration tasks with tools like WCF/Web API. Companies leverage .NET for development, infrastructure work, and automation, often deploying applications on Azure or AWS. It serves a wide range of functions, including web services, data processing, and backend development for diverse industries like telecommunications and education.

Service and Support

Customer service and support for Microsoft .NET Framework receive praise for their helpfulness and responsiveness. Many users find technical support satisfactory, highlighting quick responses and effective solutions. Some mention delays due to lengthy questioning and regional shifts. Community support and online resources often help resolve issues independently. Some users are content with internal management, occasionally contacting support for complex cases. Extended support and resources like instructional videos are appreciated.

Deployment

Microsoft .NET Framework's initial setup is generally easy and straightforward. Users appreciate the availability of required components and resources, making installation responsive and efficient. Those with technical expertise find it less challenging, although some express that training could enhance usability. Time for deployment varies, ranging from minutes to a few hours, depending on environment complexity and project needs. Certain users mention complexities on on-premises setups, but cloud-based deployments run more smoothly.

Scalability

Microsoft .NET Framework has flexible scalability, contingent on proper architecture and deployment. It can accommodate both small and large-scale projects. Some users note limitations with operating systems and cross-platform capabilities. Cloud integration, especially with Azure, enhances scalability, but on-premises versions are harder to expand. The transition to .NET Core offers better upgrades. Success depends on effective programming and architecture, with the ability to handle a wide range of users in different environments.

Stability

Microsoft .NET Framework is widely viewed as a stable platform. Users note significant improvements in newer versions, with some mentioning past issues in older versions. Stability is highly rated, with most feedback emphasizing its reliability, especially after version 4. Some report challenges with specific environments or configurations, but frequent updates contribute to overall stability. Those using it for enterprise development appreciate its consistent performance and integration with Microsoft platforms. However, rapid changes in technology occasionally introduce bugs.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Microsoft .NET Framework Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise19
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business65
Midsize Enterprise26
Large Enterprise115
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
14%
Real Estate/Law Firm
12%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Manufacturing Company
5%
University
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Performing Arts
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Non Profit
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Hospitality Company
1%
Retailer
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Logistics Company
1%

Compare Microsoft .NET Framework with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Microsoft .NET Framework

Microsoft .NET Framework Features

Microsoft .NET Framework has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

  • Memory management: With Microsoft .NET Framework apps, the CLR allocates and releases memory and handles object lifetimes in many programming languages, so programmers are not responsible to do it.
  • Multitargeting: Microsoft .NET Framework targets .NET Standard, allowing developers to create class libraries that work on multiple Microsoft .NET Framework platforms.
  • A common type system: When using Microsoft .NET Framework, basic types are defined by the .NET Framework type system and are common to all languages that target Microsoft .NET Framework as opposed to traditional programming languages where basic types are defined by the compiler.
  • Side-by-side execution: By allowing multiple versions of the common language runtime to exist on the same computer, Microsoft .NET Framework helps resolve version conflicts. In addition, an app can run on the version of Microsoft .NET Framework with which it was built and multiple versions of apps can coexist.
  • Development frameworks and technologies: Microsoft .NET Framework provides libraries for specific areas of app development, such as ASP.NET for web apps, ADO.NET for data access, Windows Communication Foundation for service-oriented apps, and Windows Presentation Foundation for Windows desktop apps.

Microsoft .NET Framework Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Microsoft .NET Framework. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

  • Language interoperability: With this Microsoft .NET Framework feature, routines written in one language are accessible to other languages, enabling programmers to focus on creating apps in their preferred languages.
  • Version compatibility: Microsoft .NET Framework offers version compatibility for rare occasions when apps that are developed by using a particular version of Microsoft .NET Framework happen to run without modification on a later version.
  • Extensive class library: With Microsoft .NET Framework, programmers have the ability to use a readily accessible Microsoft .NET Framework class library instead of having to write vast amounts of code to handle common low-level programming operations.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Microsoft .NET Framework solution.

PeerSpot user, Syed A., Principal System Developer at a government, says the solution is a “Great all in one framework with extensive stack for web applications, windows applications and mobile applications.”

A QA Supervisor at a manufacturing company mentions, “It comes with many features that you can interact with and has all of the libraries readily available, which is not available in the RPA platforms. You can create your own SSIS package. You can integrate with all of the Windows objects, which is not available in Automation Anywhere, and you need to rely on their Object Cloning technologies to interact with them.”

Brennan G., IS Technical Architect at Avara Foods Holdings Limited, comments, “It is easy to use, and it runs on a Windows platform. The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do.”

Microsoft .NET Framework was previously known as MS .NET Framework.

Microsoft .NET Framework customers

Curtin University, Rockwell Automation, Aruba Networks, Insurity Inc., City of Barcelona, Pennsylvania DCNR, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, A1 Telekom Austria AG, Eastman Chemical Company

Related questions

  • 14
Do you think there is a minimum critical threshold that justifies the deployment of the System Center suite?
  • 7
When evaluating Application Infrastructure, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 19
What application infrastructure solution do you recommend?
  • 31
What do you use application infrastructure solutions for in your organization?
  • 10
Why is Application Infrastructure important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Infrastructure

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
IBM BPM vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
IBM BPM vs Microsoft .NET Framework
IBM DataPower Gateway vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
IBM DataPower Gateway vs Microsoft .NET Framework
NGINX Plus vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
NGINX Plus vs Microsoft .NET Framework
IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
IBM WebSphere Application Server vs Microsoft .NET Framework
IIS vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
IIS vs Microsoft .NET Framework
Apache Web Server vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
Apache Web Server vs Microsoft .NET Framework
Oracle SOA Suite vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
Oracle SOA Suite vs Microsoft .NET Framework
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Microsoft .NET Framework
Azul Zulu vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
Azul Zulu vs Microsoft .NET Framework
Magic xpa Application Platform vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
Magic xpa Application Platform vs Microsoft .NET Framework
WebLogic Suite vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
WebLogic Suite vs Microsoft .NET Framework
SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal vs Microsoft .NET Framework
Windows Process Activation Services vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
Windows Process Activation Services vs Microsoft .NET Framework
Uniface vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
Uniface vs Microsoft .NET Framework
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework vs Microsoft .NET Framework Logo
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework vs Microsoft .NET Framework
See all alternatives
 
Microsoft .NET Framework Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
IT Development Manager, Architect, Developer at Miltel Communications LTD4.5We use the Microsoft .NET Framework for development due to its rich libraries and good performance, despite using a very old version. Its flexibility is limited, particularly for cloud deployment, but newer versions run smoothly.
Full Stack Engineer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees4.0I use Microsoft .NET Framework for aggregating information from endpoints for micro-frontend applications. It's beneficial for creating structured, productive projects, though expensive initially. Improvements could enhance open-source integration and reduce costs, benefiting larger enterprises and easing the development process.
System Manager at Clover SA4.5Our organization uses Microsoft .NET Framework for web and mobile development, benefiting from MAUI capabilities and seamless integration with systems like iSeries and SQL databases. We've realized a 40% ROI and improved app security, although code reusability needs enhancement.
Head Of Product Owner at Fresenius Medical Care4.0No summary available
Head of IT Department at Indus Sugar Mills Limited4.0We use Microsoft .NET Framework to develop Windows applications, providing valuable management and security features. While improvements in cloud capabilities are needed, it efficiently supports our operations, ensuring time savings. We transitioned from Visual Studio 6 without considering alternatives.
Senior Manager - Group ICT at Gulf Aluminium Rolling Mill Co. B. S. C. (c)5.0I use Microsoft .NET Framework for developing internal applications and the Microsoft workflow engine. It reduces licensing costs, lowering OpEx and CapEx. However, security needs regular updates, and audit reports should be more accessible to improve auditor visibility.
Application Architect at The Manitowoc Company, Inc.4.0As an architect, I use the .NET Framework to create flexible, consistent architectures and appreciate its middleware for security and logging. However, .NET lags behind React and Angular in SPA functionality, posing challenges for offline capabilities and speed.
Technical Manager at Landmark Group4.5As a developer using the .NET Framework, I value its cross-platform capabilities, allowing deployment across Windows, Mac, and Linux systems. However, Visual Studio for Mac lacks the robust features of its Windows counterpart, hindering productivity in non-Windows environments.