We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and WebLogic Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Initial setup is straightforward. All the components are readily available."
"The solution is not limited in storage, is customizable and simple to use."
"Microsoft .NET Framework continually innovates, particularly in Visual Studio, which focuses on improving languages, debugging, and .NET functionality."
"Microsoft .NET Framework’s most valuable features are web application development, RESTful services development, security, performance, and less memory footprint."
"As we are a software company, we find that accessing resources using this technology is easier compared to the others."
"It's easy to create and integrate things."
"A great solution for creating program solutions in a framework for Microsoft Windows quickly and easily."
"Given that it's cross-platform right now, where you can use it on Windows and Mac, that is the single most significant feature that has resulted in wider adoption of .NET."
"It easily connects to other Oracle products and services."
"A valuable feature is its integration with Oracle Database."
"WebLogic Suite is scalable."
"The product is reliable."
"WebLogic adds a lot of value to business and investments."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
"The solution is very scalable. It's easy to add processes even if you are new to the solution."
"The program is scalable."
"The .NET open source community could be larger."
"The cloud features must be improved."
"Improvements are needed in .NET development, particularly in a backend scenario."
"Microsoft .NET Framework has a steep learning curve, which could be improved."
"In my opinion, this solution can be improved by providing out-of-the-box support for different types of libraries."
"They could enhance support for Python within Visual Studio, as integrating Microsoft products with other frameworks can present a steep learning curve."
"The integration could improve in Microsoft .NET Framework."
"If Microsoft would provide a monthly subscription at a cost that a developer can afford then it would be really helpful."
"The licensing for the solution is pretty expensive. It may be the most expensive solution, if you were to compare it to the competition."
"Support could be better. The expertise when we have some Oracle WebLogic issues and challenges is not there. The issues are not being addressed in time. This really needs to be improved going forward."
"The solution needs to share more information in terms of training. There needs to be more documentation involved to help those who are completely new to the product."
"I think the support could be much better."
"I noticed a few areas for improvement in WebLogic Suite. If you use the pure play higher-availability features, then yes, it can be switched over to the other system from the high-availability point of view, but that comes with a certain price. If you prefer simpler high-availability, that requires manual intervention. I'd also recommend a tuning feature in WebLogic Suite because it's not self-tuning, and this means you need thorough expertise to do the tuning and leverage the best benefit out of it. If Oracle makes WebLogic Suite automated or self-driven, then it becomes a wonderful product, similar to what Oracle did for the Autonomous Database which is self-driven or has an autonomous operating system. If automation is added in the next release of the solution, combined with more affordable pricing, though as a technical person, I know how much goes into having automation as a feature, and it could be difficult to lower the price, but if Oracle can do it, then that would make WebLogic Suite better."
"The restart capability needs to be improved because it takes us 15 minutes to restart any application."
"I rate the scalability of WebLogic Suite an eight out of ten."
"Lacking a solution for smaller applications."
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while WebLogic Suite is ranked 11th in Application Infrastructure with 31 reviews. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while WebLogic Suite is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebLogic Suite writes "Simple setup, reliable, and performs well". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, Apache Web Server, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal, whereas WebLogic Suite is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, Oracle WebCenter, Apache Web Server and NGINX Plus. See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. WebLogic Suite report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
