We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and NGINX Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."If we take low code, no code platform such as RPA platforms, you might end up writing 100 lines of code and you might do it in a single line of code using. NET."
"Microsoft Platform is the only viable solution when I wish to do something that is not supposed to be cross-platform."
"I like that ASP.NET is used for the framework and the core web services."
"The solution is not limited in storage, is customizable and simple to use."
"Pre-programmed functions for .NET Framework are widely available."
"User-friendly and straightforward."
"The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Supports IMAP, POP and SMTP protocols for the reverse proxy."
"The load balancing module, which is equivalent to LTM, is the focus of the PSE. So far, the features of both are identical. I believe NGINX has more features for securing these services, but in terms of load balancing, both are massive solutions."
"NGINX Plus' most valuable feature is the ingress controller."
"The web proxy and the database proxy are excellent."
"NGINX Plus also has NGINX App Protect. It's a separate module, which is inspired by the F5 apps."
"This solution has everything."
"Difficult to scale this product for large organizations."
"It is of great concern to us that the solution is not very powerful on cross platform, at it impedes the ability to build and scale with it."
"I would like to see a better response time from the technical support."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the memory for better performance."
"Microsoft could improve .NET Framework by providing more resources to help users understand the solution."
"There are performance constraints when multiple users are accessing the application and that consumes CPU resources."
"This solution is best used with some training."
"I would like more web integration."
"The center management system could be improved."
"NGINX is a very basic load balancer and cannot do as many customizations as F5."
"NGINX Plus is moderately priced, but it could give better value for money."
"It would be great if there was even more automation to make it even easier to maintain."
"The drawback is that you must obtain a license for everything."
"The KPI should be more focused on load balancing and the latency in application calling from the end system."
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 6th in Application Infrastructure with 9 reviews while NGINX Plus is ranked 3rd in Application Infrastructure with 6 reviews. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 7.6, while NGINX Plus is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Lacks adequate cross-platform performance and interoperability with AS400, but is the only viable solution for non-cross-platform tasks and works smoothly with Microsoft Technologies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NGINX Plus writes "Quick installation and very easy to manage while doing orchestration or automation". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with Apache Web Server, SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal, IIS, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and WebLogic Suite, whereas NGINX Plus is most compared with IIS, HAProxy, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Kemp LoadMaster and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway. See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. NGINX Plus report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
