Microsoft .NET Framework vs Oracle SOA Suite comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 6.3. Microsoft holds a 6.0% mindshare in AIS, compared to Oracle’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft .NET Framework

Read 55 Microsoft .NET Framework reviews

1,490 Views
438 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Oracle SOA Suite

Read 65 Oracle SOA Suite reviews

887 Views
418 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Microsoft .NET Framework

Oracle SOA Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Oracle SOA Suite and Microsoft .NET Framework compete in the enterprise-grade integration category. Oracle SOA Suite has the upper hand in integration capabilities and support for B2B scenarios, while Microsoft .NET Framework offers ease of use within the Microsoft ecosystem and strong development tools.

Features: Oracle SOA Suite is known for its broad integration capabilities, supporting a wide array of technology adapters, and offering tools for process automation, monitoring, and fault handling. Microsoft .NET Framework provides robust support for web and Windows-based applications, strong development tools, and a mature platform, which integrates seamlessly with the Microsoft ecosystem.

Room for Improvement: Oracle SOA Suite needs enhancements in stability, performance, and the usability of its development environment, JDeveloper, as well as better REST support and cloud adaptability. Improvement is also needed in its sluggish support system. Microsoft .NET Framework could improve cross-platform compatibility, enhance integration with non-Microsoft products, and offer better support for big data and cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle SOA Suite's deployment is primarily on-premises, with a challenging setup and maintenance process. Customer service is generally satisfactory but can improve in technical support. Microsoft .NET Framework offers flexible deployment options in both public cloud and hybrid environments, with adequate customer service, though responsiveness could be enhanced.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle SOA Suite is a comprehensive but costly solution, with high licensing costs requiring careful ROI planning. It provides value through its extensive features. Microsoft .NET Framework presents a more cost-effective approach, especially with its open-source .NET Core variant offering free robust development tools. Although operational costs might be higher due to integration needs, .NET Framework offers a compelling value proposition.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Oracle SOA Suite Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Oracle SOA Suite

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,632 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft .NET Framework

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle SOA Suite

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SOA Governance (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Microsoft .NET Framework is 6.0%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle SOA Suite is 3.8%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

David Shlingbaum

IT Development Manager, Architect, Developer at Miltel Communications LTD

Old version maintains functionality but lacks current cloud support

Since the version I'm using is many years old, they have been continuously improving. They are always adding features to the language and framework, but I cannot comment from a very old version on what needs to be improved as I'm not completely up to date. There is a challenge and complexity in supporting a very old version of a product that is no longer supported. It's still possible with Microsoft .NET Framework, which isn't the case with many other products. That's a positive aspect. It has limitations when trying to develop new things with Microsoft .NET Framework. But whatever works, continues to work. It always needs improvement, but again, it does not improve when discussing an old version of Microsoft .NET Framework. I think they're always improving, but it's a never-ending process.

Read full review

MANOHAR SADDALA

IT Specialist at Eagle Hills

Enables seamless integration with multiple systems

I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten. It's not much more dynamic, not as dynamic as you may think, like seeing it in the cloud. In order to use it, you need to have the download servers and then scale up your systems. Oracle SOA Suites serves as a middle layer between applications. For example, let's say you have SAP, and we have Salesforce or Oracle ERP system. Users connect to those systems and perform certain activities or transactions on the applications. Now, if any data needs to be synchronized or any integration needs to happen between these applications, we use the Oracle SOA Suite. It acts as the bridge between the applications, not between the users. It's like having endpoints between the applications. Currently, we have 20 endpoints; 20 systems are connected to it, which is great. Oracle SOA Suite is being used daily. We are using it to its maximum potential.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When using Microsoft .NET Framework, you start writing the code internally."

"It facilitates running Windows business applications and leveraging enterprise application development."

"The solution's technical support is very good...The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"I'd rate the solution as highly stable."

"Initial setup is straightforward. All the components are readily available."

"The new .NET Core has those middlewares, which are awesome from a security standpoint. With the old Framework or the newer Framework, middleware is basically an event pipeline. You configure and register it, and it handles things centrally. A simple example is logging. With the old Framework, you needed to try/catch blocks everywhere. Here, you configure the logging handler once, and it captures exceptions across the application. I really like the middleware pattern."

"Firstly, I appreciate the decision to use Microsoft .NET Framework. I find it to be an excellent language, with a history rooted in providing an alternative to Java, albeit with initial challenges. It is gaining popularity and may be voted the most desirable programming language. What I particularly like about .NET is its language efficiency. While C# is the primary language, the platform also supports others, catering to those inclined towards functional programming. Although I started with Shell, I'm still grasping the concept of functional programming. Despite initial reservations about object-oriented programming, I acknowledge its advantages. .NET is a safer option, and despite criticisms, it has evolved over the years. One notable aspect is .NET's transition to an open platform in recent years, distancing itself from being exclusive to Microsoft engineers. I appreciate the versatility of .NET, enabling code production for a wide range of platforms, presenting a strong competition to Java. It allows targeting practically any physical platform, showcasing its flexibility. These qualities contribute to my positive view of .NET, totaling thirteen aspects that I find appealing."

"It facilitated the streamlined scheduling process by amalgamating inputs from various sources, including location data and other systems."

More Microsoft .NET Framework pros

"The most valuable features for us are the APIs, which we commonly use, as well as the scheduling capabilities and file transfers."

"We were able to scale out using multiple application and web servers balanced by hardware load balancers and Weblogic clustering."

"Valuable features include web service development and cloud connectivity."

"This is one of the critical products for my company and we use it extensively. We currently use each and every feature of Oracle SOA."

"The most valuable feature of Oracle SOA Suite is all the platform's capabilities."

"The product allows you to visualize how a company is working currently by providing rich possibilities for analysis such as the audit trails and therefore shows where improvements might be valuable."

"Valuable features include connectors and BAM."

"I would rate my experience with the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."

More Oracle SOA Suite pros

Cons

"Their system is very vast. I have spent 12 years here, and I can definitely say there is still a lot of scope for improvement."

"The product is nearing its sunset, and we think that by 2028, we won't get support anymore"

"The integration with DevOps tools, such as Azure DevOps, Jira, and GitLab, would be a valuable addition."

"The cloud features must be improved."

"The pricing is a bit expensive."

"I would want the product to be integrated with the different AI tools in the future since it is one of the areas where the product has certain shortcomings."

"There are performance constraints when multiple users are accessing the application and that consumes CPU resources."

"One thing that could be improved is the tooling and IDE for .NET in non-Windows environments like Mac."

More Microsoft .NET Framework cons

"It's also not developer-friendly."

"Its function options can be improved."

"If the disk space expansion can be made more flexible, not requiring a database restart, it would be a major benefit."

"The technical support is good, we have premier support which costs extra."

"The installation and adjustment process seems too complex."

"Other solutions might be better componets such as Salesforce."

"I want to see easier integration connections with other cloud-based tools."

"The deployment could be made easier by including add-ons like Hudson and Maven."

More Oracle SOA Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The support is an extra cost when purchasing the license. The price of the solution is overall reasonable and paid annually or every three years. Additionally, they have a monthly license. The cost is approximately $1,000 per user."

"The pricing could be cheaper."

"If you want to develop an enterprise-level application, you have to purchase the enterprise-level development license."

"Do your homework. Consider the partnership program."

"The product’s pricing is a bit high."

"It's an expensive solution"

"The solution is free but you need to pay for a license for the hosting service."

"Considering the bigger picture, opting for the Microsoft ecosystem can be beneficial and it is priced well. When relying on entirely open-source solutions, you may encounter challenges associated with dealing with multiple vendors and potentially compromised security measures. However, it is important to note that Microsoft could enhance its performance when it comes to addressing critical security concerns."

More Microsoft .NET Framework pricing and cost advice

"Based on my knowledge, Oracle SOA Suite doesn't have user-based licensing. It has a system-based licensing model, so you pay for whole systems. Oracle SOA Suite is an expensive solution, so it's a four out of ten for me."

"The product is moderately priced."

"Oracle SOA Suite is an expensive solution."

"It is necessary to evaluate the requirement regarding the platform usage and what the main operation area of the platform will be."

"Oracle pricing is expensive. Support is based on your license. AWS is much better than Oracle in this regard."

"This product is WebLogic based, hence it can be both resource hungry as well as expensive from a licensing point of view."

"The pricing is not very high as compared to its competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Real Estate/Law Firm

12%

Construction Company

12%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft .NET Framework?

Microsoft .NET Framework continually innovates, particularly in Visual Studio, which focuses on improving languages, debugging, and .NET functionality.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft .NET Framework?

The company is not paying anything for the license. I am not familiar with this area. For us, it's free.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft .NET Framework?

There may be some topics regarding connectivity and management of certificates that require attention. We are currently facing some issues.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle SOA Suite?

The solution's XSLT or XSL Transformation feature was very useful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle SOA Suite?

Oracle SOA Suite is an expensive solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle SOA Suite?

The solution’s initial setup is complex and could be improved. A big challenge for Oracle SOA Suite is that you don't get too many technical resources.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Web Server vs Microsoft .NET Framework

Compared 19% of the time

IIS vs Microsoft .NET Framework

Compared 16% of the time

Magic xpa Application Platform vs Microsoft .NET Framework

Compared 14% of the time

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs Microsoft .NET Framework

Compared 11% of the time

Uniface vs Microsoft .NET Framework

Compared 10% of the time

More Microsoft .NET Framework Competitors

WebLogic Suite vs Oracle SOA Suite

Compared 47% of the time

Mule ESB vs Oracle SOA Suite

Compared 17% of the time

Apache Web Server vs Oracle SOA Suite

Compared 15% of the time

TIBCO ActiveMatrix vs Oracle SOA Suite

Compared 11% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs Oracle SOA Suite

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle SOA Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft .NET Framework

June 2025

Download Microsoft .NET Framework product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle SOA Suite

June 2025

Download Oracle SOA Suite product report

Also Known As

MS .NET Framework

SOA Suite

Overview

Microsoft .NET Framework is a software development framework for building and running applications for Windows, Windows Phone, Windows servers, XML Web services, and Microsoft Azure. The software is made up of two major components: Common Language Runtime (CLR) and the .NET Framework Class Library. The CLR is the execution engine that handles running apps and the Class Library is a library of tested, reusable code that developers can call from their own apps.

Microsoft .NET Framework Features

Microsoft .NET Framework has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Memory management: With Microsoft .NET Framework apps, the CLR allocates and releases memory and handles object lifetimes in many programming languages, so programmers are not responsible to do it.

Multitargeting: Microsoft .NET Framework targets .NET Standard, allowing developers to create class libraries that work on multiple Microsoft .NET Framework platforms.

A common type system: When using Microsoft .NET Framework, basic types are defined by the .NET Framework type system and are common to all languages that target Microsoft .NET Framework as opposed to traditional programming languages where basic types are defined by the compiler.

Side-by-side execution: By allowing multiple versions of the common language runtime to exist on the same computer, Microsoft .NET Framework helps resolve version conflicts. In addition, an app can run on the version of Microsoft .NET Framework with which it was built and multiple versions of apps can coexist.

Development frameworks and technologies: Microsoft .NET Framework provides libraries for specific areas of app development, such as ASP.NET for web apps, ADO.NET for data access, Windows Communication Foundation for service-oriented apps, and Windows Presentation Foundation for Windows desktop apps.

Microsoft .NET Framework Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Microsoft .NET Framework. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Language interoperability: With this Microsoft .NET Framework feature, routines written in one language are accessible to other languages, enabling programmers to focus on creating apps in their preferred languages.

Version compatibility: Microsoft .NET Framework offers version compatibility for rare occasions when apps that are developed by using a particular version of Microsoft .NET Framework happen to run without modification on a later version.

Extensive class library: With Microsoft .NET Framework, programmers have the ability to use a readily accessible Microsoft .NET Framework class library instead of having to write vast amounts of code to handle common low-level programming operations.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Microsoft .NET Framework solution.

PeerSpot user, Syed A., Principal System Developer at a government, says the solution is a “Great all in one framework with extensive stack for web applications, windows applications and mobile applications.”

A QA Supervisor at a manufacturing company mentions, “It comes with many features that you can interact with and has all of the libraries readily available, which is not available in the RPA platforms. You can create your own SSIS package. You can integrate with all of the Windows objects, which is not available in Automation Anywhere, and you need to rely on their Object Cloning technologies to interact with them.”

Brennan G., IS Technical Architect at Avara Foods Holdings Limited, comments, “It is easy to use, and it runs on a Windows platform. The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do.”

Microsoft

Oracle SOA Suite is a comprehensive, standards-based software suite to build, deploy and manage integration following the concepts of service-oriented architecture (SOA). The components of the suite benefit from consistent tooling, a single deployment and management model, end-to-end security and unified metadata management. Oracle SOA Suite helps businesses lower costs by allowing maximum re-use of existing IT investments and assets, regardless of the environment (OS, application server, etc.) they run in, or the technology they were built upon. Its easy-to-use, re-use focused, unified application development tooling and end-to-end lifecycle management support further reduces development and maintenance cost and complexity.

For more information on Oracle SOA Suite, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

Curtin University, Rockwell Automation, Aruba Networks, Insurity Inc., City of Barcelona, Pennsylvania DCNR, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, A1 Telekom Austria AG, Eastman Chemical Company

7-Eleven, Arcor SAIC, Banca Transilvania, Eaton Corporation, Emdeon, Ferrovial, Griffith University, National Instruments, Pella Corporation, Vodafone Group Plc,

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Oracle SOA Suite

June 2025

Free Report: Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Oracle SOA Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Oracle SOA Suite and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Oracle SOA Suite report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.