We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and Microsoft System Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."User-friendly and straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is customization."
"The web development and Microsoft Windows service development capabilities are among the most valuable features offered by the Microsoft .NET Framework. This language platform is highly user-friendly, with plenty of online examples and information available, as well as a robust development environment."
"It facilitated the streamlined scheduling process by amalgamating inputs from various sources, including location data and other systems."
"In-built refactoring and .Net profilers are the most valuable features of the solution."
"The .NET framework is a mature platform that is very helpful and saves time during the software development process."
"Ease of use, the richness of the libraries and basically very good development tools."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft .NET Framework is debugging."
"We like Microsoft System Center's Operations Manager. That is primarily why we use it."
"The solution is easily available. That's its most valuable aspect."
"The availability performance matrix and the reporting capabilities are the solution's most valuable features."
"Good for managing and administering the infrastructure."
"Step-by-step documentation that clarifies the implementation procedure."
"The deployment and asset management features are the most valuable. These are the product's main features."
"Many processes could be implemented out-of-the-box, and this helped to adopt processes in areas which we lacked."
"System Center helps to create the basis for ITIL alignment."
"Needs stronger security with respect to cloud issues."
"The cloud features must be improved."
"There are performance constraints when multiple users are accessing the application and that consumes CPU resources."
"Difficult to scale this product for large organizations."
"The product’s reliability needs improvement."
"Improvements are needed in .NET development, particularly in a backend scenario."
"I would like to see more pre-built features in the MVC framework because as it is now, it's very open and you have to develop your own controls in order to use it."
"In the realm of Microsoft .NET Framework, particularly in the C# language, there have been significant developments that I find highly commendable. I am genuinely fascinated by the continuous evolution of the language, and staying abreast of the latest features in Azure is both challenging and enjoyable. Working with C# in Azure is particularly fantastic. I appreciate in .NET, as compared to Java, is the enforcement of types, providing a better experience in terms of technicalities. Additionally, the introduction of Roslyn in the past few years has brought about the concept of late .NET, which I find interesting and powerful. This allows for the transformation of symbolic code just before execution, eliminating the runtime decision-making process and enhancing efficiency. However, late .NET does come with a drawback – a delay in the last-minute computation when starting an executable. While some may find this less appealing in terms of instant responsiveness, especially in serverless cloud environments, the efficiency gained from executing strictly binary code is valuable. Despite potential drawbacks like the time required for activation, I view .NET favorably for its technical advancements and efficiency, especially in scenarios such as serverless cloud computing. It's essential to recognize the intricacies of how .NET processes code and the efficiency it brings, which some may overlook."
"The platform's performance could be improved. Additionally, its UI needs to be well-upgraded and work faster."
"The platform performance and responsiveness need improvement. It still demands high computing resources."
"Less server consumption would help, as would better, more flexible reports."
"The solution's dashboard needs improvement."
"Most of the documentation is online, however, there are some gaps there. The product documentation still refers back to the 2012 Server. We're pretty much in 2022. There's a ten-year gap there."
"Something super important that we need is this integration via Intune Configuration Manager."
"In Microsoft System Center, it is difficult to follow the steps to create dataflows at times."
"The multi-tenancy support needs to be improved. We need to have the ability to manage several different environments from one central point of administration."
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 44 reviews while Microsoft System Center is ranked 14th in Application Infrastructure with 17 reviews. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while Microsoft System Center is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "A very reliable and near-universal framework for app development". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft System Center writes "Good review of configurations, effective antivirus administration, and has weekly reports". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, Apache Web Server, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and Windows Process Activation Services, whereas Microsoft System Center is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite. See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. Microsoft System Center report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.