We performed a comparison between JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and Microsoft .NET Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Stable and easy to handle in terms of hosting applications."
"Its technical support is excellent."
"It's convenient and barebone."
"The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance."
"The solution is quite stable."
"The .NET Framework simplified operations dealing with the allocation and deallocation of memory spaces and the additional processing resources."
"Proven solution with valuable customization."
"Microsoft Platform is the only viable solution when I wish to do something that is not supposed to be cross-platform."
"Firstly, I appreciate the decision to use Microsoft .NET Framework. I find it to be an excellent language, with a history rooted in providing an alternative to Java, albeit with initial challenges. It is gaining popularity and may be voted the most desirable programming language. What I particularly like about .NET is its language efficiency. While C# is the primary language, the platform also supports others, catering to those inclined towards functional programming. Although I started with Shell, I'm still grasping the concept of functional programming. Despite initial reservations about object-oriented programming, I acknowledge its advantages. .NET is a safer option, and despite criticisms, it has evolved over the years. One notable aspect is .NET's transition to an open platform in recent years, distancing itself from being exclusive to Microsoft engineers. I appreciate the versatility of .NET, enabling code production for a wide range of platforms, presenting a strong competition to Java. It allows targeting practically any physical platform, showcasing its flexibility. These qualities contribute to my positive view of .NET, totaling thirteen aspects that I find appealing."
"Ease of use, the richness of the libraries and basically very good development tools."
"The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do."
"It's easy to create and integrate things."
"User-friendly and straightforward."
"It's hard to find out the root cause of errors."
"Its architecture needs improvement."
"A graphic user interface can be added."
"This solution needs better management UI."
"Lacks some functional requirements."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The integration with DevOps tools, such as Azure DevOps, Jira, and GitLab, would be a valuable addition."
"I would like to see more pre-built features in the MVC framework because as it is now, it's very open and you have to develop your own controls in order to use it."
"The .NET open source community could be larger."
"In the next release, I am looking for more advanced technologies such as socket communication and enhanced features like realtime chat with the clients."
"The solution is difficult to learn if someone is learning it for the first time."
"In my opinion, this solution can be improved by providing out-of-the-box support for different types of libraries."
"The integration could improve in Microsoft .NET Framework."
More JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 9th in Application Infrastructure with 5 reviews while Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0, while Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides excellent technical support with a good response time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with IBM WebSphere Application Server, Apache Web Server, IBM BPM and NGINX Plus, whereas Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, Apache Web Server, Windows Process Activation Services and IBM WebSphere Application Server. See our JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft .NET Framework report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
